Cargando…
Multicenter Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial Comparing Hemodynamic Optimization Against Echocardiographic Optimization of AV and VV Delay of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: The BRAVO Trial
OBJECTIVES: BRAVO (British Randomized Controlled Trial of AV and VV Optimization) is a multicenter, randomized, crossover, noninferiority trial comparing echocardiographic optimization of atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular delay with a noninvasive blood pressure method. BACKGROUND: Cardiac r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6682561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29778861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.02.014 |
_version_ | 1783441908010319872 |
---|---|
author | Whinnett, Zachary I. Sohaib, S.M. Afzal Mason, Mark Duncan, Edward Tanner, Mark Lefroy, David Al-Obaidi, Mohamed Ellery, Sue Leyva-Leon, Francisco Betts, Tim Dayer, Mark Foley, Paul Swinburn, Jon Thomas, Martin Khiani, Raj Wong, Tom Yousef, Zaheer Rogers, Dominic Kalra, Paul R. Dhileepan, Vignesh March, Katherine Howard, James Kyriacou, Andreas Mayet, Jamil Kanagaratnam, Prapa Frenneaux, Michael Hughes, Alun D. Francis, Darrel P. |
author_facet | Whinnett, Zachary I. Sohaib, S.M. Afzal Mason, Mark Duncan, Edward Tanner, Mark Lefroy, David Al-Obaidi, Mohamed Ellery, Sue Leyva-Leon, Francisco Betts, Tim Dayer, Mark Foley, Paul Swinburn, Jon Thomas, Martin Khiani, Raj Wong, Tom Yousef, Zaheer Rogers, Dominic Kalra, Paul R. Dhileepan, Vignesh March, Katherine Howard, James Kyriacou, Andreas Mayet, Jamil Kanagaratnam, Prapa Frenneaux, Michael Hughes, Alun D. Francis, Darrel P. |
author_sort | Whinnett, Zachary I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: BRAVO (British Randomized Controlled Trial of AV and VV Optimization) is a multicenter, randomized, crossover, noninferiority trial comparing echocardiographic optimization of atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular delay with a noninvasive blood pressure method. BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy including AV delay optimization confers clinical benefit, but the optimization requires time and expertise to perform. METHODS: This study randomized patients to echocardiographic optimization or hemodynamic optimization using multiple-replicate beat-by-beat noninvasive blood pressure at baseline; after 6 months, participants were crossed over to the other optimization arm of the trial. The primary outcome was exercise capacity, quantified as peak exercise oxygen uptake. Secondary outcome measures were echocardiographic left ventricular (LV) remodeling, quality-of-life scores, and N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide. RESULTS: A total of 401 patients were enrolled, the median age was 69 years, 78% of patients were men, and the New York Heart Association functional class was II in 84% and III in 16%. The primary endpoint, peak oxygen uptake, met the criterion for noninferiority (p(noninferiority) = 0.0001), with no significant difference between the hemodynamically optimized arm and echocardiographically optimized arm of the trial (mean difference 0.1 ml/kg/min). Secondary endpoints for noninferiority were also met for symptoms (mean difference in Minnesota score 1; p(noninferiority) = 0.002) and hormonal changes (mean change in N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide -10 pg/ml; p(noninferiority) = 0.002). There was no significant difference in LV size (mean change in LV systolic dimension 1 mm; p(noninferiority) < 0.001; LV diastolic dimension 0 mm; p(noninferiority) <0.001). In 30% of patients the AV delay identified as optimal was more than 20 ms from the nominal setting of 120 ms. CONCLUSIONS: Optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy devices by using noninvasive blood pressure is noninferior to echocardiographic optimization. Therefore, noninvasive hemodynamic optimization is an acceptable alternative that has the potential to be automated and thus more easily implemented. (British Randomized Controlled Trial of AV and VV Optimization [BRAVO]; NCT01258829) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6682561 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66825612019-08-12 Multicenter Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial Comparing Hemodynamic Optimization Against Echocardiographic Optimization of AV and VV Delay of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: The BRAVO Trial Whinnett, Zachary I. Sohaib, S.M. Afzal Mason, Mark Duncan, Edward Tanner, Mark Lefroy, David Al-Obaidi, Mohamed Ellery, Sue Leyva-Leon, Francisco Betts, Tim Dayer, Mark Foley, Paul Swinburn, Jon Thomas, Martin Khiani, Raj Wong, Tom Yousef, Zaheer Rogers, Dominic Kalra, Paul R. Dhileepan, Vignesh March, Katherine Howard, James Kyriacou, Andreas Mayet, Jamil Kanagaratnam, Prapa Frenneaux, Michael Hughes, Alun D. Francis, Darrel P. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Article OBJECTIVES: BRAVO (British Randomized Controlled Trial of AV and VV Optimization) is a multicenter, randomized, crossover, noninferiority trial comparing echocardiographic optimization of atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular delay with a noninvasive blood pressure method. BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy including AV delay optimization confers clinical benefit, but the optimization requires time and expertise to perform. METHODS: This study randomized patients to echocardiographic optimization or hemodynamic optimization using multiple-replicate beat-by-beat noninvasive blood pressure at baseline; after 6 months, participants were crossed over to the other optimization arm of the trial. The primary outcome was exercise capacity, quantified as peak exercise oxygen uptake. Secondary outcome measures were echocardiographic left ventricular (LV) remodeling, quality-of-life scores, and N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide. RESULTS: A total of 401 patients were enrolled, the median age was 69 years, 78% of patients were men, and the New York Heart Association functional class was II in 84% and III in 16%. The primary endpoint, peak oxygen uptake, met the criterion for noninferiority (p(noninferiority) = 0.0001), with no significant difference between the hemodynamically optimized arm and echocardiographically optimized arm of the trial (mean difference 0.1 ml/kg/min). Secondary endpoints for noninferiority were also met for symptoms (mean difference in Minnesota score 1; p(noninferiority) = 0.002) and hormonal changes (mean change in N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide -10 pg/ml; p(noninferiority) = 0.002). There was no significant difference in LV size (mean change in LV systolic dimension 1 mm; p(noninferiority) < 0.001; LV diastolic dimension 0 mm; p(noninferiority) <0.001). In 30% of patients the AV delay identified as optimal was more than 20 ms from the nominal setting of 120 ms. CONCLUSIONS: Optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy devices by using noninvasive blood pressure is noninferior to echocardiographic optimization. Therefore, noninvasive hemodynamic optimization is an acceptable alternative that has the potential to be automated and thus more easily implemented. (British Randomized Controlled Trial of AV and VV Optimization [BRAVO]; NCT01258829) Elsevier 2019-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6682561/ /pubmed/29778861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.02.014 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Whinnett, Zachary I. Sohaib, S.M. Afzal Mason, Mark Duncan, Edward Tanner, Mark Lefroy, David Al-Obaidi, Mohamed Ellery, Sue Leyva-Leon, Francisco Betts, Tim Dayer, Mark Foley, Paul Swinburn, Jon Thomas, Martin Khiani, Raj Wong, Tom Yousef, Zaheer Rogers, Dominic Kalra, Paul R. Dhileepan, Vignesh March, Katherine Howard, James Kyriacou, Andreas Mayet, Jamil Kanagaratnam, Prapa Frenneaux, Michael Hughes, Alun D. Francis, Darrel P. Multicenter Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial Comparing Hemodynamic Optimization Against Echocardiographic Optimization of AV and VV Delay of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: The BRAVO Trial |
title | Multicenter Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial Comparing Hemodynamic Optimization Against Echocardiographic Optimization of AV and VV Delay of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: The BRAVO Trial |
title_full | Multicenter Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial Comparing Hemodynamic Optimization Against Echocardiographic Optimization of AV and VV Delay of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: The BRAVO Trial |
title_fullStr | Multicenter Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial Comparing Hemodynamic Optimization Against Echocardiographic Optimization of AV and VV Delay of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: The BRAVO Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Multicenter Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial Comparing Hemodynamic Optimization Against Echocardiographic Optimization of AV and VV Delay of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: The BRAVO Trial |
title_short | Multicenter Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial Comparing Hemodynamic Optimization Against Echocardiographic Optimization of AV and VV Delay of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: The BRAVO Trial |
title_sort | multicenter randomized controlled crossover trial comparing hemodynamic optimization against echocardiographic optimization of av and vv delay of cardiac resynchronization therapy: the bravo trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6682561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29778861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.02.014 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT whinnettzacharyi multicenterrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrialcomparinghemodynamicoptimizationagainstechocardiographicoptimizationofavandvvdelayofcardiacresynchronizationtherapythebravotrial AT sohaibsmafzal multicenterrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrialcomparinghemodynamicoptimizationagainstechocardiographicoptimizationofavandvvdelayofcardiacresynchronizationtherapythebravotrial AT masonmark multicenterrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrialcomparinghemodynamicoptimizationagainstechocardiographicoptimizationofavandvvdelayofcardiacresynchronizationtherapythebravotrial AT duncanedward multicenterrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrialcomparinghemodynamicoptimizationagainstechocardiographicoptimizationofavandvvdelayofcardiacresynchronizationtherapythebravotrial AT tannermark multicenterrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrialcomparinghemodynamicoptimizationagainstechocardiographicoptimizationofavandvvdelayofcardiacresynchronizationtherapythebravotrial AT lefroydavid multicenterrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrialcomparinghemodynamicoptimizationagainstechocardiographicoptimizationofavandvvdelayofcardiacresynchronizationtherapythebravotrial AT alobaidimohamed multicenterrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrialcomparinghemodynamicoptimizationagainstechocardiographicoptimizationofavandvvdelayofcardiacresynchronizationtherapythebravotrial AT ellerysue multicenterrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrialcomparinghemodynamicoptimizationagainstechocardiographicoptimizationofavandvvdelayofcardiacresynchronizationtherapythebravotrial AT leyvaleonfrancisco multicenterrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrialcomparinghemodynamicoptimizationagainstechocardiographicoptimizationofavandvvdelayofcardiacresynchronizationtherapythebravotrial AT bettstim multicenterrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrialcomparinghemodynamicoptimizationagainstechocardiographicoptimizationofavandvvdelayofcardiacresynchronizationtherapythebravotrial AT dayermark multicenterrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrialcomparinghemodynamicoptimizationagainstechocardiographicoptimizationofavandvvdelayofcardiacresynchronizationtherapythebravotrial AT foleypaul multicenterrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrialcomparinghemodynamicoptimizationagainstechocardiographicoptimizationofavandvvdelayofcardiacresynchronizationtherapythebravotrial AT swinburnjon multicenterrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrialcomparinghemodynamicoptimizationagainstechocardiographicoptimizationofavandvvdelayofcardiacresynchronizationtherapythebravotrial AT thomasmartin multicenterrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrialcomparinghemodynamicoptimizationagainstechocardiographicoptimizationofavandvvdelayofcardiacresynchronizationtherapythebravotrial AT khianiraj multicenterrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrialcomparinghemodynamicoptimizationagainstechocardiographicoptimizationofavandvvdelayofcardiacresynchronizationtherapythebravotrial AT wongtom multicenterrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrialcomparinghemodynamicoptimizationagainstechocardiographicoptimizationofavandvvdelayofcardiacresynchronizationtherapythebravotrial AT yousefzaheer multicenterrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrialcomparinghemodynamicoptimizationagainstechocardiographicoptimizationofavandvvdelayofcardiacresynchronizationtherapythebravotrial AT rogersdominic multicenterrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrialcomparinghemodynamicoptimizationagainstechocardiographicoptimizationofavandvvdelayofcardiacresynchronizationtherapythebravotrial AT kalrapaulr multicenterrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrialcomparinghemodynamicoptimizationagainstechocardiographicoptimizationofavandvvdelayofcardiacresynchronizationtherapythebravotrial AT dhileepanvignesh multicenterrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrialcomparinghemodynamicoptimizationagainstechocardiographicoptimizationofavandvvdelayofcardiacresynchronizationtherapythebravotrial AT marchkatherine multicenterrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrialcomparinghemodynamicoptimizationagainstechocardiographicoptimizationofavandvvdelayofcardiacresynchronizationtherapythebravotrial AT howardjames multicenterrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrialcomparinghemodynamicoptimizationagainstechocardiographicoptimizationofavandvvdelayofcardiacresynchronizationtherapythebravotrial AT kyriacouandreas multicenterrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrialcomparinghemodynamicoptimizationagainstechocardiographicoptimizationofavandvvdelayofcardiacresynchronizationtherapythebravotrial AT mayetjamil multicenterrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrialcomparinghemodynamicoptimizationagainstechocardiographicoptimizationofavandvvdelayofcardiacresynchronizationtherapythebravotrial AT kanagaratnamprapa multicenterrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrialcomparinghemodynamicoptimizationagainstechocardiographicoptimizationofavandvvdelayofcardiacresynchronizationtherapythebravotrial AT frenneauxmichael multicenterrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrialcomparinghemodynamicoptimizationagainstechocardiographicoptimizationofavandvvdelayofcardiacresynchronizationtherapythebravotrial AT hughesalund multicenterrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrialcomparinghemodynamicoptimizationagainstechocardiographicoptimizationofavandvvdelayofcardiacresynchronizationtherapythebravotrial AT francisdarrelp multicenterrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrialcomparinghemodynamicoptimizationagainstechocardiographicoptimizationofavandvvdelayofcardiacresynchronizationtherapythebravotrial |