Cargando…

Evaluation of the histopathological extent of neoplastic infiltration in intestinal tumours in cats

With the exception of intestinal lymphoma, surgery is the most commonly recommended treatment for solitary feline intestinal tumours. However, there is a lack of evidence to substantiate resection margin recommendations for these tumours. The aim of this study was to add knowledge concerning resecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morrice, Michael, Polton, Gerry, Beck, Sam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6682799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30859750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.166
_version_ 1783441955029516288
author Morrice, Michael
Polton, Gerry
Beck, Sam
author_facet Morrice, Michael
Polton, Gerry
Beck, Sam
author_sort Morrice, Michael
collection PubMed
description With the exception of intestinal lymphoma, surgery is the most commonly recommended treatment for solitary feline intestinal tumours. However, there is a lack of evidence to substantiate resection margin recommendations for these tumours. The aim of this study was to add knowledge concerning resection margins for discrete intestinal masses in cats. Thirty confirmed feline intestinal tumours removed at veterinary centres across the UK from March 2017 to March 2018 underwent histological assessment at the palpable edge of the intestinal tumour and then at every 1 cm increment to the surgeon‐cut tissue border in oral, aboral and mesenteric directions. Histological margin recommendations were developed for carcinoma and lymphoma tumour types and non‐lymphoma intestinal tumours collectively. Seventeen intestinal lymphomas, nine carcinomas, two sarcomas and two mast cell tumours were evaluated in this study. Seven of the nine intestinal carcinomas would have been completely removed with histological margins of 4 cm in oral and aboral directions. Both sarcomas and one mast cell tumour would have been removed in their entirety with 4 cm histological margins in oral and aboral directions. There was extensive and varied microscopic invasion of intestinal tissue away from discrete intestinal lymphomas in the majority of the cases in this study. There is increasing evidence in veterinary as well as human literature supporting the role of surgical resection in the treatment of discrete intestinal lymphoma. If surgery is to be considered this study supports the removal of the gross tumour only. A histological margin of 4 cm should be considered, where possible, for intestinal masses other than lymphomas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6682799
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66827992019-08-12 Evaluation of the histopathological extent of neoplastic infiltration in intestinal tumours in cats Morrice, Michael Polton, Gerry Beck, Sam Vet Med Sci Original Articles With the exception of intestinal lymphoma, surgery is the most commonly recommended treatment for solitary feline intestinal tumours. However, there is a lack of evidence to substantiate resection margin recommendations for these tumours. The aim of this study was to add knowledge concerning resection margins for discrete intestinal masses in cats. Thirty confirmed feline intestinal tumours removed at veterinary centres across the UK from March 2017 to March 2018 underwent histological assessment at the palpable edge of the intestinal tumour and then at every 1 cm increment to the surgeon‐cut tissue border in oral, aboral and mesenteric directions. Histological margin recommendations were developed for carcinoma and lymphoma tumour types and non‐lymphoma intestinal tumours collectively. Seventeen intestinal lymphomas, nine carcinomas, two sarcomas and two mast cell tumours were evaluated in this study. Seven of the nine intestinal carcinomas would have been completely removed with histological margins of 4 cm in oral and aboral directions. Both sarcomas and one mast cell tumour would have been removed in their entirety with 4 cm histological margins in oral and aboral directions. There was extensive and varied microscopic invasion of intestinal tissue away from discrete intestinal lymphomas in the majority of the cases in this study. There is increasing evidence in veterinary as well as human literature supporting the role of surgical resection in the treatment of discrete intestinal lymphoma. If surgery is to be considered this study supports the removal of the gross tumour only. A histological margin of 4 cm should be considered, where possible, for intestinal masses other than lymphomas. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6682799/ /pubmed/30859750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.166 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Veterinary Medicine and Science Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Morrice, Michael
Polton, Gerry
Beck, Sam
Evaluation of the histopathological extent of neoplastic infiltration in intestinal tumours in cats
title Evaluation of the histopathological extent of neoplastic infiltration in intestinal tumours in cats
title_full Evaluation of the histopathological extent of neoplastic infiltration in intestinal tumours in cats
title_fullStr Evaluation of the histopathological extent of neoplastic infiltration in intestinal tumours in cats
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the histopathological extent of neoplastic infiltration in intestinal tumours in cats
title_short Evaluation of the histopathological extent of neoplastic infiltration in intestinal tumours in cats
title_sort evaluation of the histopathological extent of neoplastic infiltration in intestinal tumours in cats
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6682799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30859750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.166
work_keys_str_mv AT morricemichael evaluationofthehistopathologicalextentofneoplasticinfiltrationinintestinaltumoursincats
AT poltongerry evaluationofthehistopathologicalextentofneoplasticinfiltrationinintestinaltumoursincats
AT becksam evaluationofthehistopathologicalextentofneoplasticinfiltrationinintestinaltumoursincats