Cargando…

Bovine brucellosis in Pakistan; an analysis of engagement with risk factors in smallholder farmer settings

A cross‐sectional study was conducted to estimate the seroprevalence of bovine brucellosis in smallholder farms in seven regions in Pakistan, identify herd and individual level risk factors for seropositivity and assess the level of engagement of farmers with risk factors. In total, 1063 cattle and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arif, Shumaila, Thomson, Peter C., Hernandez‐Jover, Marta, McGill, David M., Warriach, Hassan M., Hayat, Khizar, Heller, Jane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6682800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30957947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.165
_version_ 1783441955260203008
author Arif, Shumaila
Thomson, Peter C.
Hernandez‐Jover, Marta
McGill, David M.
Warriach, Hassan M.
Hayat, Khizar
Heller, Jane
author_facet Arif, Shumaila
Thomson, Peter C.
Hernandez‐Jover, Marta
McGill, David M.
Warriach, Hassan M.
Hayat, Khizar
Heller, Jane
author_sort Arif, Shumaila
collection PubMed
description A cross‐sectional study was conducted to estimate the seroprevalence of bovine brucellosis in smallholder farms in seven regions in Pakistan, identify herd and individual level risk factors for seropositivity and assess the level of engagement of farmers with risk factors. In total, 1063 cattle and buffalo belonging to 420 herds in seven districts were sampled. The Rose Bengal test (RBT), indirect enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (I‐ELISA) and competitive enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (C‐ELISA) were used for the serological diagnosis of bovine brucellosis on all the serum samples. The associations between herd‐and animal‐level risk factors and seropositivity were investigated using logistic regression analyses. In addition, herd management practice scores, created to quantify the number of management practices undertaken that pose a risk for Brucella transmission, were calculated and compared between seropositive and negative herds within each district. Overall herd and animal prevalence were estimated to be 16.2% (95% CI, 13–20%) and 8.7% (95% CI, 7.2–10.6%), respectively, across all districts sampled. Herds with a history of last trimester abortion were found to be more likely to be positive than herds without such history (OR = 2.06, 95% CI, 1.09–3.89), providing validation of our findings and identifying that clinical disease is occurring in this region. It was also identified that herds with five to eight buffalo (OR = 3.80, 95% CI, 1.69–8.49), and those with more than eight buffalo (OR = 3.81, 95% CI, 1.51–9.58) were more likely to be positive for Brucella than those with less (one to two and three to four) buffaloes present in the herd. The presence of other domestic animals at the farm and purchasing animals in last year were found to have no association with seropositivity. The findings of this study support the need for the development of targeted intervention strategies specific to the disease status of each district.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6682800
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66828002019-08-12 Bovine brucellosis in Pakistan; an analysis of engagement with risk factors in smallholder farmer settings Arif, Shumaila Thomson, Peter C. Hernandez‐Jover, Marta McGill, David M. Warriach, Hassan M. Hayat, Khizar Heller, Jane Vet Med Sci Review A cross‐sectional study was conducted to estimate the seroprevalence of bovine brucellosis in smallholder farms in seven regions in Pakistan, identify herd and individual level risk factors for seropositivity and assess the level of engagement of farmers with risk factors. In total, 1063 cattle and buffalo belonging to 420 herds in seven districts were sampled. The Rose Bengal test (RBT), indirect enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (I‐ELISA) and competitive enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (C‐ELISA) were used for the serological diagnosis of bovine brucellosis on all the serum samples. The associations between herd‐and animal‐level risk factors and seropositivity were investigated using logistic regression analyses. In addition, herd management practice scores, created to quantify the number of management practices undertaken that pose a risk for Brucella transmission, were calculated and compared between seropositive and negative herds within each district. Overall herd and animal prevalence were estimated to be 16.2% (95% CI, 13–20%) and 8.7% (95% CI, 7.2–10.6%), respectively, across all districts sampled. Herds with a history of last trimester abortion were found to be more likely to be positive than herds without such history (OR = 2.06, 95% CI, 1.09–3.89), providing validation of our findings and identifying that clinical disease is occurring in this region. It was also identified that herds with five to eight buffalo (OR = 3.80, 95% CI, 1.69–8.49), and those with more than eight buffalo (OR = 3.81, 95% CI, 1.51–9.58) were more likely to be positive for Brucella than those with less (one to two and three to four) buffaloes present in the herd. The presence of other domestic animals at the farm and purchasing animals in last year were found to have no association with seropositivity. The findings of this study support the need for the development of targeted intervention strategies specific to the disease status of each district. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6682800/ /pubmed/30957947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.165 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Veterinary Medicine and Science Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Arif, Shumaila
Thomson, Peter C.
Hernandez‐Jover, Marta
McGill, David M.
Warriach, Hassan M.
Hayat, Khizar
Heller, Jane
Bovine brucellosis in Pakistan; an analysis of engagement with risk factors in smallholder farmer settings
title Bovine brucellosis in Pakistan; an analysis of engagement with risk factors in smallholder farmer settings
title_full Bovine brucellosis in Pakistan; an analysis of engagement with risk factors in smallholder farmer settings
title_fullStr Bovine brucellosis in Pakistan; an analysis of engagement with risk factors in smallholder farmer settings
title_full_unstemmed Bovine brucellosis in Pakistan; an analysis of engagement with risk factors in smallholder farmer settings
title_short Bovine brucellosis in Pakistan; an analysis of engagement with risk factors in smallholder farmer settings
title_sort bovine brucellosis in pakistan; an analysis of engagement with risk factors in smallholder farmer settings
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6682800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30957947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vms3.165
work_keys_str_mv AT arifshumaila bovinebrucellosisinpakistanananalysisofengagementwithriskfactorsinsmallholderfarmersettings
AT thomsonpeterc bovinebrucellosisinpakistanananalysisofengagementwithriskfactorsinsmallholderfarmersettings
AT hernandezjovermarta bovinebrucellosisinpakistanananalysisofengagementwithriskfactorsinsmallholderfarmersettings
AT mcgilldavidm bovinebrucellosisinpakistanananalysisofengagementwithriskfactorsinsmallholderfarmersettings
AT warriachhassanm bovinebrucellosisinpakistanananalysisofengagementwithriskfactorsinsmallholderfarmersettings
AT hayatkhizar bovinebrucellosisinpakistanananalysisofengagementwithriskfactorsinsmallholderfarmersettings
AT hellerjane bovinebrucellosisinpakistanananalysisofengagementwithriskfactorsinsmallholderfarmersettings