Cargando…

The mental representation of true and false intentions: a comparison of schema-consistent and schema-inconsistent tasks

True and false intentions (i.e., lies and truths about one’s future actions) is a relatively new research topic, despite the high societal value of being able to predict future criminal behavior (e.g., in the case of an alleged terrorist attack). The current study examined how true and false intenti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Calderon, Sofia, Ask, Karl, Mac Giolla, Erik, Granhag, Pär Anders
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6682835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31385113
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0173-4
_version_ 1783441957600624640
author Calderon, Sofia
Ask, Karl
Mac Giolla, Erik
Granhag, Pär Anders
author_facet Calderon, Sofia
Ask, Karl
Mac Giolla, Erik
Granhag, Pär Anders
author_sort Calderon, Sofia
collection PubMed
description True and false intentions (i.e., lies and truths about one’s future actions) is a relatively new research topic, despite the high societal value of being able to predict future criminal behavior (e.g., in the case of an alleged terrorist attack). The current study examined how true and false intentions are mentally represented - the knowledge of which can aid the development of new deception detection methods. Participants (N = 151) were asked either to form a true intention about a future task (i.e., retrieve objects from an office) or to form a false intention about the same task (i.e., prepare a cover story about retrieving objects from an office) to conceal their actual intention (i.e., leave a secret note in the office). The schema consistency of the task was manipulated by presenting participants with a list of office supplies (schema-consistent) or random objects (schema-inconsistent) to be retrieved from the office. The abstractness of mental construal was operationalized as the number of categories used by participants to organize the task-relevant objects into thematic groups. We predicted, based on construal level theory (CLT) and action identification theory, that participants would mentally represent true intentions more concretely (i.e., use a larger number of categories) than false intentions, particularly for schema-inconsistent (versus schema-consistent) future tasks. The results of the study lend no support for these predictions. Instead, a Bayesian analysis revealed strong evidence in favor of the null hypothesis. The findings indicate that predictions from CLT do not readily translate into deception contexts. The results are discussed in light of recent failed attempts to apply CLT to research on true and false intentions, and highlight the need for alternative approaches to the topic. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s41235-019-0173-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6682835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66828352019-08-23 The mental representation of true and false intentions: a comparison of schema-consistent and schema-inconsistent tasks Calderon, Sofia Ask, Karl Mac Giolla, Erik Granhag, Pär Anders Cogn Res Princ Implic Original Article True and false intentions (i.e., lies and truths about one’s future actions) is a relatively new research topic, despite the high societal value of being able to predict future criminal behavior (e.g., in the case of an alleged terrorist attack). The current study examined how true and false intentions are mentally represented - the knowledge of which can aid the development of new deception detection methods. Participants (N = 151) were asked either to form a true intention about a future task (i.e., retrieve objects from an office) or to form a false intention about the same task (i.e., prepare a cover story about retrieving objects from an office) to conceal their actual intention (i.e., leave a secret note in the office). The schema consistency of the task was manipulated by presenting participants with a list of office supplies (schema-consistent) or random objects (schema-inconsistent) to be retrieved from the office. The abstractness of mental construal was operationalized as the number of categories used by participants to organize the task-relevant objects into thematic groups. We predicted, based on construal level theory (CLT) and action identification theory, that participants would mentally represent true intentions more concretely (i.e., use a larger number of categories) than false intentions, particularly for schema-inconsistent (versus schema-consistent) future tasks. The results of the study lend no support for these predictions. Instead, a Bayesian analysis revealed strong evidence in favor of the null hypothesis. The findings indicate that predictions from CLT do not readily translate into deception contexts. The results are discussed in light of recent failed attempts to apply CLT to research on true and false intentions, and highlight the need for alternative approaches to the topic. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s41235-019-0173-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6682835/ /pubmed/31385113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0173-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Calderon, Sofia
Ask, Karl
Mac Giolla, Erik
Granhag, Pär Anders
The mental representation of true and false intentions: a comparison of schema-consistent and schema-inconsistent tasks
title The mental representation of true and false intentions: a comparison of schema-consistent and schema-inconsistent tasks
title_full The mental representation of true and false intentions: a comparison of schema-consistent and schema-inconsistent tasks
title_fullStr The mental representation of true and false intentions: a comparison of schema-consistent and schema-inconsistent tasks
title_full_unstemmed The mental representation of true and false intentions: a comparison of schema-consistent and schema-inconsistent tasks
title_short The mental representation of true and false intentions: a comparison of schema-consistent and schema-inconsistent tasks
title_sort mental representation of true and false intentions: a comparison of schema-consistent and schema-inconsistent tasks
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6682835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31385113
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0173-4
work_keys_str_mv AT calderonsofia thementalrepresentationoftrueandfalseintentionsacomparisonofschemaconsistentandschemainconsistenttasks
AT askkarl thementalrepresentationoftrueandfalseintentionsacomparisonofschemaconsistentandschemainconsistenttasks
AT macgiollaerik thementalrepresentationoftrueandfalseintentionsacomparisonofschemaconsistentandschemainconsistenttasks
AT granhagparanders thementalrepresentationoftrueandfalseintentionsacomparisonofschemaconsistentandschemainconsistenttasks
AT calderonsofia mentalrepresentationoftrueandfalseintentionsacomparisonofschemaconsistentandschemainconsistenttasks
AT askkarl mentalrepresentationoftrueandfalseintentionsacomparisonofschemaconsistentandschemainconsistenttasks
AT macgiollaerik mentalrepresentationoftrueandfalseintentionsacomparisonofschemaconsistentandschemainconsistenttasks
AT granhagparanders mentalrepresentationoftrueandfalseintentionsacomparisonofschemaconsistentandschemainconsistenttasks