Cargando…

The effects of deep-brain non-stimulation in severe obsessive-compulsive disorder: an individual patient data meta-analysis

Non-intervention-related effects have long been recognized in an array of medical interventions, to which surgical procedures like deep-brain stimulation are no exception. While the existence of placebo and micro-lesion effects has been convincingly demonstrated in DBS for major depression and Parki...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schruers, Koen, Baldi, Samantha, van den Heuvel, Tijl, Goossens, Liesbet, Luyten, Laura, Leentjens, Albert. F. G., Ackermans, Linda, Temel, Yasin, Viechtbauer, Wolfgang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6683131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31383848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-019-0522-6
_version_ 1783442022096437248
author Schruers, Koen
Baldi, Samantha
van den Heuvel, Tijl
Goossens, Liesbet
Luyten, Laura
Leentjens, Albert. F. G.
Ackermans, Linda
Temel, Yasin
Viechtbauer, Wolfgang
author_facet Schruers, Koen
Baldi, Samantha
van den Heuvel, Tijl
Goossens, Liesbet
Luyten, Laura
Leentjens, Albert. F. G.
Ackermans, Linda
Temel, Yasin
Viechtbauer, Wolfgang
author_sort Schruers, Koen
collection PubMed
description Non-intervention-related effects have long been recognized in an array of medical interventions, to which surgical procedures like deep-brain stimulation are no exception. While the existence of placebo and micro-lesion effects has been convincingly demonstrated in DBS for major depression and Parkinson’s disease, systematic investigations for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are currently lacking. We therefore undertook an individual patient data meta-analysis with the aim of quantifying the effect of DBS for severe, treatment-resistant OCD that is not due to the electrical stimulation of brain tissue. The MEDLINE/PubMed database was searched for double-blind, sham-controlled randomized clinical trials published in English between 1998 and 2018. Individual patient data was obtained from the original authors and combined in a meta-analysis. We assessed differences from baseline in obsessive-compulsive symptoms following sham treatment, as measured by the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS). Four studies met the inclusion criteria, randomizing 49 patients to two periods of active or sham stimulation. To preclude confounding by period effects, our estimate was based only on data from those patients who underwent sham stimulation first (n = 24). We found that sham stimulation induced a significant change in the Y-BOCS score (t = −3.15, P < 0.005), lowering it by 4.9 ± 1.6 points [95% CI = (−8.0, –1.8)]. We conclude that non-stimulation-related effects of DBS exist also in OCD. The identification of the factors determining the magnitude and occurrence of these effects will help to design strategies that will ultimately lead to a betterment of future randomized clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6683131
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66831312019-08-08 The effects of deep-brain non-stimulation in severe obsessive-compulsive disorder: an individual patient data meta-analysis Schruers, Koen Baldi, Samantha van den Heuvel, Tijl Goossens, Liesbet Luyten, Laura Leentjens, Albert. F. G. Ackermans, Linda Temel, Yasin Viechtbauer, Wolfgang Transl Psychiatry Review Article Non-intervention-related effects have long been recognized in an array of medical interventions, to which surgical procedures like deep-brain stimulation are no exception. While the existence of placebo and micro-lesion effects has been convincingly demonstrated in DBS for major depression and Parkinson’s disease, systematic investigations for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are currently lacking. We therefore undertook an individual patient data meta-analysis with the aim of quantifying the effect of DBS for severe, treatment-resistant OCD that is not due to the electrical stimulation of brain tissue. The MEDLINE/PubMed database was searched for double-blind, sham-controlled randomized clinical trials published in English between 1998 and 2018. Individual patient data was obtained from the original authors and combined in a meta-analysis. We assessed differences from baseline in obsessive-compulsive symptoms following sham treatment, as measured by the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS). Four studies met the inclusion criteria, randomizing 49 patients to two periods of active or sham stimulation. To preclude confounding by period effects, our estimate was based only on data from those patients who underwent sham stimulation first (n = 24). We found that sham stimulation induced a significant change in the Y-BOCS score (t = −3.15, P < 0.005), lowering it by 4.9 ± 1.6 points [95% CI = (−8.0, –1.8)]. We conclude that non-stimulation-related effects of DBS exist also in OCD. The identification of the factors determining the magnitude and occurrence of these effects will help to design strategies that will ultimately lead to a betterment of future randomized clinical trials. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6683131/ /pubmed/31383848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-019-0522-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review Article
Schruers, Koen
Baldi, Samantha
van den Heuvel, Tijl
Goossens, Liesbet
Luyten, Laura
Leentjens, Albert. F. G.
Ackermans, Linda
Temel, Yasin
Viechtbauer, Wolfgang
The effects of deep-brain non-stimulation in severe obsessive-compulsive disorder: an individual patient data meta-analysis
title The effects of deep-brain non-stimulation in severe obsessive-compulsive disorder: an individual patient data meta-analysis
title_full The effects of deep-brain non-stimulation in severe obsessive-compulsive disorder: an individual patient data meta-analysis
title_fullStr The effects of deep-brain non-stimulation in severe obsessive-compulsive disorder: an individual patient data meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The effects of deep-brain non-stimulation in severe obsessive-compulsive disorder: an individual patient data meta-analysis
title_short The effects of deep-brain non-stimulation in severe obsessive-compulsive disorder: an individual patient data meta-analysis
title_sort effects of deep-brain non-stimulation in severe obsessive-compulsive disorder: an individual patient data meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6683131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31383848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-019-0522-6
work_keys_str_mv AT schruerskoen theeffectsofdeepbrainnonstimulationinsevereobsessivecompulsivedisorderanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis
AT baldisamantha theeffectsofdeepbrainnonstimulationinsevereobsessivecompulsivedisorderanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis
AT vandenheuveltijl theeffectsofdeepbrainnonstimulationinsevereobsessivecompulsivedisorderanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis
AT goossensliesbet theeffectsofdeepbrainnonstimulationinsevereobsessivecompulsivedisorderanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis
AT luytenlaura theeffectsofdeepbrainnonstimulationinsevereobsessivecompulsivedisorderanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis
AT leentjensalbertfg theeffectsofdeepbrainnonstimulationinsevereobsessivecompulsivedisorderanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis
AT ackermanslinda theeffectsofdeepbrainnonstimulationinsevereobsessivecompulsivedisorderanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis
AT temelyasin theeffectsofdeepbrainnonstimulationinsevereobsessivecompulsivedisorderanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis
AT viechtbauerwolfgang theeffectsofdeepbrainnonstimulationinsevereobsessivecompulsivedisorderanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis
AT schruerskoen effectsofdeepbrainnonstimulationinsevereobsessivecompulsivedisorderanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis
AT baldisamantha effectsofdeepbrainnonstimulationinsevereobsessivecompulsivedisorderanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis
AT vandenheuveltijl effectsofdeepbrainnonstimulationinsevereobsessivecompulsivedisorderanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis
AT goossensliesbet effectsofdeepbrainnonstimulationinsevereobsessivecompulsivedisorderanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis
AT luytenlaura effectsofdeepbrainnonstimulationinsevereobsessivecompulsivedisorderanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis
AT leentjensalbertfg effectsofdeepbrainnonstimulationinsevereobsessivecompulsivedisorderanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis
AT ackermanslinda effectsofdeepbrainnonstimulationinsevereobsessivecompulsivedisorderanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis
AT temelyasin effectsofdeepbrainnonstimulationinsevereobsessivecompulsivedisorderanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis
AT viechtbauerwolfgang effectsofdeepbrainnonstimulationinsevereobsessivecompulsivedisorderanindividualpatientdatametaanalysis