Cargando…

Biliary stenting alone versus biliary stenting combined with (125)I particles intracavitary irradiation for the treatment of advanced cholangiocarcinoma

We aimed to compare the efficacy of percutaneous transhepatic biliary stenting (PTBS) and PTBS combined with (125)I particles implantation in the treatment of advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHC). A total of 184 advanced EHC patients, who received PTBS (PTBS group) or PTBS combined with (1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pang, Qing, Zhou, Lei, Hu, Xiao-Si, Wang, Yong, Man, Zhong-Ran, Yang, Song, Wang, Wei, Qian, Zhen, Jin, Hao, Liu, Hui-Chun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6683155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31383886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47791-4
_version_ 1783442027559518208
author Pang, Qing
Zhou, Lei
Hu, Xiao-Si
Wang, Yong
Man, Zhong-Ran
Yang, Song
Wang, Wei
Qian, Zhen
Jin, Hao
Liu, Hui-Chun
author_facet Pang, Qing
Zhou, Lei
Hu, Xiao-Si
Wang, Yong
Man, Zhong-Ran
Yang, Song
Wang, Wei
Qian, Zhen
Jin, Hao
Liu, Hui-Chun
author_sort Pang, Qing
collection PubMed
description We aimed to compare the efficacy of percutaneous transhepatic biliary stenting (PTBS) and PTBS combined with (125)I particles implantation in the treatment of advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHC). A total of 184 advanced EHC patients, who received PTBS (PTBS group) or PTBS combined with (125)I particles implantation (PTBS + (125)I group) from January 2012 to April 2017 in our department, were retrospectively reviewed. The improvement of jaundice and liver function was observed in both groups. The postoperative complications, risk of biliary re-obstruction, and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups. Amongst, 71 cases received PTBS and 113 had the additional implantation of (125)I particles. The jaundice and liver function were significantly improved in all patients, especially in PTBS + (125)I group. There was no significant difference in the risk of postoperative complications between the two groups. However, the risk of biliary re-obstruction significantly reduced in PTBS + (125)I group (19.5% vs. 35.2%, p = 0.017). Kaplan Meier analysis showed that patients in PTBS + (125)I group had a significantly better OS, both for hilar and distal cholangiocarcinoma. Univariate analysis demonstrated that preoperative levels of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), total bilirubin, neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, and different therapeutic method were significant factors affecting OS. Multivariate analysis further identified the treatment of PTBS combined with (125)I particles implantation as an independent protective prognostic factor (HR = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.17–0.39, p < 0.001). In conclusion, for patients with advanced EHC, PTBS combined with (125)I particles implantation is superior to PTBS alone in improving liver function, inhibiting biliary re-obstruction, and prolonging survival time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6683155
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66831552019-08-09 Biliary stenting alone versus biliary stenting combined with (125)I particles intracavitary irradiation for the treatment of advanced cholangiocarcinoma Pang, Qing Zhou, Lei Hu, Xiao-Si Wang, Yong Man, Zhong-Ran Yang, Song Wang, Wei Qian, Zhen Jin, Hao Liu, Hui-Chun Sci Rep Article We aimed to compare the efficacy of percutaneous transhepatic biliary stenting (PTBS) and PTBS combined with (125)I particles implantation in the treatment of advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHC). A total of 184 advanced EHC patients, who received PTBS (PTBS group) or PTBS combined with (125)I particles implantation (PTBS + (125)I group) from January 2012 to April 2017 in our department, were retrospectively reviewed. The improvement of jaundice and liver function was observed in both groups. The postoperative complications, risk of biliary re-obstruction, and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups. Amongst, 71 cases received PTBS and 113 had the additional implantation of (125)I particles. The jaundice and liver function were significantly improved in all patients, especially in PTBS + (125)I group. There was no significant difference in the risk of postoperative complications between the two groups. However, the risk of biliary re-obstruction significantly reduced in PTBS + (125)I group (19.5% vs. 35.2%, p = 0.017). Kaplan Meier analysis showed that patients in PTBS + (125)I group had a significantly better OS, both for hilar and distal cholangiocarcinoma. Univariate analysis demonstrated that preoperative levels of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), total bilirubin, neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, and different therapeutic method were significant factors affecting OS. Multivariate analysis further identified the treatment of PTBS combined with (125)I particles implantation as an independent protective prognostic factor (HR = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.17–0.39, p < 0.001). In conclusion, for patients with advanced EHC, PTBS combined with (125)I particles implantation is superior to PTBS alone in improving liver function, inhibiting biliary re-obstruction, and prolonging survival time. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6683155/ /pubmed/31383886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47791-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Pang, Qing
Zhou, Lei
Hu, Xiao-Si
Wang, Yong
Man, Zhong-Ran
Yang, Song
Wang, Wei
Qian, Zhen
Jin, Hao
Liu, Hui-Chun
Biliary stenting alone versus biliary stenting combined with (125)I particles intracavitary irradiation for the treatment of advanced cholangiocarcinoma
title Biliary stenting alone versus biliary stenting combined with (125)I particles intracavitary irradiation for the treatment of advanced cholangiocarcinoma
title_full Biliary stenting alone versus biliary stenting combined with (125)I particles intracavitary irradiation for the treatment of advanced cholangiocarcinoma
title_fullStr Biliary stenting alone versus biliary stenting combined with (125)I particles intracavitary irradiation for the treatment of advanced cholangiocarcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Biliary stenting alone versus biliary stenting combined with (125)I particles intracavitary irradiation for the treatment of advanced cholangiocarcinoma
title_short Biliary stenting alone versus biliary stenting combined with (125)I particles intracavitary irradiation for the treatment of advanced cholangiocarcinoma
title_sort biliary stenting alone versus biliary stenting combined with (125)i particles intracavitary irradiation for the treatment of advanced cholangiocarcinoma
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6683155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31383886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47791-4
work_keys_str_mv AT pangqing biliarystentingaloneversusbiliarystentingcombinedwith125iparticlesintracavitaryirradiationforthetreatmentofadvancedcholangiocarcinoma
AT zhoulei biliarystentingaloneversusbiliarystentingcombinedwith125iparticlesintracavitaryirradiationforthetreatmentofadvancedcholangiocarcinoma
AT huxiaosi biliarystentingaloneversusbiliarystentingcombinedwith125iparticlesintracavitaryirradiationforthetreatmentofadvancedcholangiocarcinoma
AT wangyong biliarystentingaloneversusbiliarystentingcombinedwith125iparticlesintracavitaryirradiationforthetreatmentofadvancedcholangiocarcinoma
AT manzhongran biliarystentingaloneversusbiliarystentingcombinedwith125iparticlesintracavitaryirradiationforthetreatmentofadvancedcholangiocarcinoma
AT yangsong biliarystentingaloneversusbiliarystentingcombinedwith125iparticlesintracavitaryirradiationforthetreatmentofadvancedcholangiocarcinoma
AT wangwei biliarystentingaloneversusbiliarystentingcombinedwith125iparticlesintracavitaryirradiationforthetreatmentofadvancedcholangiocarcinoma
AT qianzhen biliarystentingaloneversusbiliarystentingcombinedwith125iparticlesintracavitaryirradiationforthetreatmentofadvancedcholangiocarcinoma
AT jinhao biliarystentingaloneversusbiliarystentingcombinedwith125iparticlesintracavitaryirradiationforthetreatmentofadvancedcholangiocarcinoma
AT liuhuichun biliarystentingaloneversusbiliarystentingcombinedwith125iparticlesintracavitaryirradiationforthetreatmentofadvancedcholangiocarcinoma