Cargando…
Validity of additional surgical resection by comparing the operative risk with the stratified lymph node metastatic risk in patients with early gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection
BACKGROUND: Treatment guidelines for early gastric cancer (EGC) recommend additional gastrectomy for lesions which do not achieve curative resection after ESD, due to the potential risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM). However, many cases are found to have no LNMs, and additional gastrectomy itself c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6683358/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31382963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-019-1679-4 |
_version_ | 1783442074593394688 |
---|---|
author | Akaike, Hidenori Kawaguchi, Yoshihiko Shiraishi, Kensuke Shimizu, Hiroki Furuya, Shinji Hosomura, Naohiro Amemiya, Hidetake Kawaida, Hiromichi Sudoh, Makoto Inoue, Shingo Kohno, Hiroshi Ichikawa, Daisuke |
author_facet | Akaike, Hidenori Kawaguchi, Yoshihiko Shiraishi, Kensuke Shimizu, Hiroki Furuya, Shinji Hosomura, Naohiro Amemiya, Hidetake Kawaida, Hiromichi Sudoh, Makoto Inoue, Shingo Kohno, Hiroshi Ichikawa, Daisuke |
author_sort | Akaike, Hidenori |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Treatment guidelines for early gastric cancer (EGC) recommend additional gastrectomy for lesions which do not achieve curative resection after ESD, due to the potential risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM). However, many cases are found to have no LNMs, and additional gastrectomy itself can be a considerable risk especially in elderly patients. METHODS: We retrospectively stratified the risk of LNM according to the total number of four LNM risk factors (RFs) that resulted in non-curative resection for ESD in 861 EGC patients who underwent gastrectomy. Next, we compared this stratification risk to the surgical risk based on the National Clinical Database (NCD) risk calculator in 58 patients who underwent additional gastrectomy. RESULTS: As the total number of LNM RFs increased, the frequency of LNM also increased significantly (0/1RF 0.76%, 2RFs 15.08%, 3RFs 33.87%, 4RFs 50.00%; p < 0.01). The estimated frequency of LNM was found to be lower than the predicted value of in-hospital mortality rate based on the NCD risk calculator in 25.0% of 0/1RF patients. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate, at least, that we should discuss the indication of additional gastrectomy individually for each patient from both perspectives of LNM and surgical risks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6683358 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66833582019-08-09 Validity of additional surgical resection by comparing the operative risk with the stratified lymph node metastatic risk in patients with early gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection Akaike, Hidenori Kawaguchi, Yoshihiko Shiraishi, Kensuke Shimizu, Hiroki Furuya, Shinji Hosomura, Naohiro Amemiya, Hidetake Kawaida, Hiromichi Sudoh, Makoto Inoue, Shingo Kohno, Hiroshi Ichikawa, Daisuke World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Treatment guidelines for early gastric cancer (EGC) recommend additional gastrectomy for lesions which do not achieve curative resection after ESD, due to the potential risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM). However, many cases are found to have no LNMs, and additional gastrectomy itself can be a considerable risk especially in elderly patients. METHODS: We retrospectively stratified the risk of LNM according to the total number of four LNM risk factors (RFs) that resulted in non-curative resection for ESD in 861 EGC patients who underwent gastrectomy. Next, we compared this stratification risk to the surgical risk based on the National Clinical Database (NCD) risk calculator in 58 patients who underwent additional gastrectomy. RESULTS: As the total number of LNM RFs increased, the frequency of LNM also increased significantly (0/1RF 0.76%, 2RFs 15.08%, 3RFs 33.87%, 4RFs 50.00%; p < 0.01). The estimated frequency of LNM was found to be lower than the predicted value of in-hospital mortality rate based on the NCD risk calculator in 25.0% of 0/1RF patients. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate, at least, that we should discuss the indication of additional gastrectomy individually for each patient from both perspectives of LNM and surgical risks. BioMed Central 2019-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6683358/ /pubmed/31382963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-019-1679-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Akaike, Hidenori Kawaguchi, Yoshihiko Shiraishi, Kensuke Shimizu, Hiroki Furuya, Shinji Hosomura, Naohiro Amemiya, Hidetake Kawaida, Hiromichi Sudoh, Makoto Inoue, Shingo Kohno, Hiroshi Ichikawa, Daisuke Validity of additional surgical resection by comparing the operative risk with the stratified lymph node metastatic risk in patients with early gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection |
title | Validity of additional surgical resection by comparing the operative risk with the stratified lymph node metastatic risk in patients with early gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection |
title_full | Validity of additional surgical resection by comparing the operative risk with the stratified lymph node metastatic risk in patients with early gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection |
title_fullStr | Validity of additional surgical resection by comparing the operative risk with the stratified lymph node metastatic risk in patients with early gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection |
title_full_unstemmed | Validity of additional surgical resection by comparing the operative risk with the stratified lymph node metastatic risk in patients with early gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection |
title_short | Validity of additional surgical resection by comparing the operative risk with the stratified lymph node metastatic risk in patients with early gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection |
title_sort | validity of additional surgical resection by comparing the operative risk with the stratified lymph node metastatic risk in patients with early gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6683358/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31382963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-019-1679-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT akaikehidenori validityofadditionalsurgicalresectionbycomparingtheoperativeriskwiththestratifiedlymphnodemetastaticriskinpatientswithearlygastriccancerafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissection AT kawaguchiyoshihiko validityofadditionalsurgicalresectionbycomparingtheoperativeriskwiththestratifiedlymphnodemetastaticriskinpatientswithearlygastriccancerafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissection AT shiraishikensuke validityofadditionalsurgicalresectionbycomparingtheoperativeriskwiththestratifiedlymphnodemetastaticriskinpatientswithearlygastriccancerafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissection AT shimizuhiroki validityofadditionalsurgicalresectionbycomparingtheoperativeriskwiththestratifiedlymphnodemetastaticriskinpatientswithearlygastriccancerafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissection AT furuyashinji validityofadditionalsurgicalresectionbycomparingtheoperativeriskwiththestratifiedlymphnodemetastaticriskinpatientswithearlygastriccancerafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissection AT hosomuranaohiro validityofadditionalsurgicalresectionbycomparingtheoperativeriskwiththestratifiedlymphnodemetastaticriskinpatientswithearlygastriccancerafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissection AT amemiyahidetake validityofadditionalsurgicalresectionbycomparingtheoperativeriskwiththestratifiedlymphnodemetastaticriskinpatientswithearlygastriccancerafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissection AT kawaidahiromichi validityofadditionalsurgicalresectionbycomparingtheoperativeriskwiththestratifiedlymphnodemetastaticriskinpatientswithearlygastriccancerafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissection AT sudohmakoto validityofadditionalsurgicalresectionbycomparingtheoperativeriskwiththestratifiedlymphnodemetastaticriskinpatientswithearlygastriccancerafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissection AT inoueshingo validityofadditionalsurgicalresectionbycomparingtheoperativeriskwiththestratifiedlymphnodemetastaticriskinpatientswithearlygastriccancerafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissection AT kohnohiroshi validityofadditionalsurgicalresectionbycomparingtheoperativeriskwiththestratifiedlymphnodemetastaticriskinpatientswithearlygastriccancerafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissection AT ichikawadaisuke validityofadditionalsurgicalresectionbycomparingtheoperativeriskwiththestratifiedlymphnodemetastaticriskinpatientswithearlygastriccancerafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissection |