Cargando…

Validity of additional surgical resection by comparing the operative risk with the stratified lymph node metastatic risk in patients with early gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND: Treatment guidelines for early gastric cancer (EGC) recommend additional gastrectomy for lesions which do not achieve curative resection after ESD, due to the potential risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM). However, many cases are found to have no LNMs, and additional gastrectomy itself c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akaike, Hidenori, Kawaguchi, Yoshihiko, Shiraishi, Kensuke, Shimizu, Hiroki, Furuya, Shinji, Hosomura, Naohiro, Amemiya, Hidetake, Kawaida, Hiromichi, Sudoh, Makoto, Inoue, Shingo, Kohno, Hiroshi, Ichikawa, Daisuke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6683358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31382963
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-019-1679-4
_version_ 1783442074593394688
author Akaike, Hidenori
Kawaguchi, Yoshihiko
Shiraishi, Kensuke
Shimizu, Hiroki
Furuya, Shinji
Hosomura, Naohiro
Amemiya, Hidetake
Kawaida, Hiromichi
Sudoh, Makoto
Inoue, Shingo
Kohno, Hiroshi
Ichikawa, Daisuke
author_facet Akaike, Hidenori
Kawaguchi, Yoshihiko
Shiraishi, Kensuke
Shimizu, Hiroki
Furuya, Shinji
Hosomura, Naohiro
Amemiya, Hidetake
Kawaida, Hiromichi
Sudoh, Makoto
Inoue, Shingo
Kohno, Hiroshi
Ichikawa, Daisuke
author_sort Akaike, Hidenori
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Treatment guidelines for early gastric cancer (EGC) recommend additional gastrectomy for lesions which do not achieve curative resection after ESD, due to the potential risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM). However, many cases are found to have no LNMs, and additional gastrectomy itself can be a considerable risk especially in elderly patients. METHODS: We retrospectively stratified the risk of LNM according to the total number of four LNM risk factors (RFs) that resulted in non-curative resection for ESD in 861 EGC patients who underwent gastrectomy. Next, we compared this stratification risk to the surgical risk based on the National Clinical Database (NCD) risk calculator in 58 patients who underwent additional gastrectomy. RESULTS: As the total number of LNM RFs increased, the frequency of LNM also increased significantly (0/1RF 0.76%, 2RFs 15.08%, 3RFs 33.87%, 4RFs 50.00%; p < 0.01). The estimated frequency of LNM was found to be lower than the predicted value of in-hospital mortality rate based on the NCD risk calculator in 25.0% of 0/1RF patients. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate, at least, that we should discuss the indication of additional gastrectomy individually for each patient from both perspectives of LNM and surgical risks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6683358
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66833582019-08-09 Validity of additional surgical resection by comparing the operative risk with the stratified lymph node metastatic risk in patients with early gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection Akaike, Hidenori Kawaguchi, Yoshihiko Shiraishi, Kensuke Shimizu, Hiroki Furuya, Shinji Hosomura, Naohiro Amemiya, Hidetake Kawaida, Hiromichi Sudoh, Makoto Inoue, Shingo Kohno, Hiroshi Ichikawa, Daisuke World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Treatment guidelines for early gastric cancer (EGC) recommend additional gastrectomy for lesions which do not achieve curative resection after ESD, due to the potential risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM). However, many cases are found to have no LNMs, and additional gastrectomy itself can be a considerable risk especially in elderly patients. METHODS: We retrospectively stratified the risk of LNM according to the total number of four LNM risk factors (RFs) that resulted in non-curative resection for ESD in 861 EGC patients who underwent gastrectomy. Next, we compared this stratification risk to the surgical risk based on the National Clinical Database (NCD) risk calculator in 58 patients who underwent additional gastrectomy. RESULTS: As the total number of LNM RFs increased, the frequency of LNM also increased significantly (0/1RF 0.76%, 2RFs 15.08%, 3RFs 33.87%, 4RFs 50.00%; p < 0.01). The estimated frequency of LNM was found to be lower than the predicted value of in-hospital mortality rate based on the NCD risk calculator in 25.0% of 0/1RF patients. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate, at least, that we should discuss the indication of additional gastrectomy individually for each patient from both perspectives of LNM and surgical risks. BioMed Central 2019-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6683358/ /pubmed/31382963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-019-1679-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Akaike, Hidenori
Kawaguchi, Yoshihiko
Shiraishi, Kensuke
Shimizu, Hiroki
Furuya, Shinji
Hosomura, Naohiro
Amemiya, Hidetake
Kawaida, Hiromichi
Sudoh, Makoto
Inoue, Shingo
Kohno, Hiroshi
Ichikawa, Daisuke
Validity of additional surgical resection by comparing the operative risk with the stratified lymph node metastatic risk in patients with early gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection
title Validity of additional surgical resection by comparing the operative risk with the stratified lymph node metastatic risk in patients with early gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection
title_full Validity of additional surgical resection by comparing the operative risk with the stratified lymph node metastatic risk in patients with early gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection
title_fullStr Validity of additional surgical resection by comparing the operative risk with the stratified lymph node metastatic risk in patients with early gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection
title_full_unstemmed Validity of additional surgical resection by comparing the operative risk with the stratified lymph node metastatic risk in patients with early gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection
title_short Validity of additional surgical resection by comparing the operative risk with the stratified lymph node metastatic risk in patients with early gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection
title_sort validity of additional surgical resection by comparing the operative risk with the stratified lymph node metastatic risk in patients with early gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6683358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31382963
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-019-1679-4
work_keys_str_mv AT akaikehidenori validityofadditionalsurgicalresectionbycomparingtheoperativeriskwiththestratifiedlymphnodemetastaticriskinpatientswithearlygastriccancerafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT kawaguchiyoshihiko validityofadditionalsurgicalresectionbycomparingtheoperativeriskwiththestratifiedlymphnodemetastaticriskinpatientswithearlygastriccancerafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT shiraishikensuke validityofadditionalsurgicalresectionbycomparingtheoperativeriskwiththestratifiedlymphnodemetastaticriskinpatientswithearlygastriccancerafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT shimizuhiroki validityofadditionalsurgicalresectionbycomparingtheoperativeriskwiththestratifiedlymphnodemetastaticriskinpatientswithearlygastriccancerafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT furuyashinji validityofadditionalsurgicalresectionbycomparingtheoperativeriskwiththestratifiedlymphnodemetastaticriskinpatientswithearlygastriccancerafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT hosomuranaohiro validityofadditionalsurgicalresectionbycomparingtheoperativeriskwiththestratifiedlymphnodemetastaticriskinpatientswithearlygastriccancerafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT amemiyahidetake validityofadditionalsurgicalresectionbycomparingtheoperativeriskwiththestratifiedlymphnodemetastaticriskinpatientswithearlygastriccancerafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT kawaidahiromichi validityofadditionalsurgicalresectionbycomparingtheoperativeriskwiththestratifiedlymphnodemetastaticriskinpatientswithearlygastriccancerafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT sudohmakoto validityofadditionalsurgicalresectionbycomparingtheoperativeriskwiththestratifiedlymphnodemetastaticriskinpatientswithearlygastriccancerafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT inoueshingo validityofadditionalsurgicalresectionbycomparingtheoperativeriskwiththestratifiedlymphnodemetastaticriskinpatientswithearlygastriccancerafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT kohnohiroshi validityofadditionalsurgicalresectionbycomparingtheoperativeriskwiththestratifiedlymphnodemetastaticriskinpatientswithearlygastriccancerafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissection
AT ichikawadaisuke validityofadditionalsurgicalresectionbycomparingtheoperativeriskwiththestratifiedlymphnodemetastaticriskinpatientswithearlygastriccancerafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissection