Cargando…

Diagnostic and grading accuracy of (18)F-FDOPA PET and PET/CT in patients with gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography (PET) and PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging with 3,4-dihydroxy-6-[(18)F] fluoro-L-phenylalanine ((18)F-FDOPA) has been used in the evaluation of gliomas. We performed a meta-analysis to obtain the diagnostic and grading accuracy of (18)F-FDOPA PET and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiao, Jiarui, Jin, Yizi, Nie, Ji, Chen, Fukun, Ma, Xuelei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6683403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31382920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5938-0
_version_ 1783442085164089344
author Xiao, Jiarui
Jin, Yizi
Nie, Ji
Chen, Fukun
Ma, Xuelei
author_facet Xiao, Jiarui
Jin, Yizi
Nie, Ji
Chen, Fukun
Ma, Xuelei
author_sort Xiao, Jiarui
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography (PET) and PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging with 3,4-dihydroxy-6-[(18)F] fluoro-L-phenylalanine ((18)F-FDOPA) has been used in the evaluation of gliomas. We performed a meta-analysis to obtain the diagnostic and grading accuracy of (18)F-FDOPA PET and PET/CT in patients with gliomas. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched through 13 May 2019. We included studies reporting the diagnostic performance of (18)F-FDOPA PET or PET/CT in glioma patients. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve were calculated from eligible studies on a per-lesion basis. RESULTS: Eventually, 19 studies were included. Across 13 studies (370 patients) for glioma diagnosis, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of (18)F-FDOPA PET and PET/CT were 0.90 (95%CI: 0.86–0.93) and 0.75 (95%CI: 0.65–0.83). Across 7 studies (219 patients) for glioma grading, (18)F-FDOPA PET and PET/CT showed a pooled sensitivity of 0.88 (95%CI: 0.81–0.93) and a pooled specificity of 0.73 (95%CI: 0.64–0.81). CONCLUSIONS: (18)F-FDOPA PET and PET/CT demonstrated good performance for diagnosing gliomas and differentiating high-grade gliomas (HGGs) from low-grade gliomas (LGGs). Further studies implementing standardized PET protocols and investigating the grading parameters are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6683403
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66834032019-08-09 Diagnostic and grading accuracy of (18)F-FDOPA PET and PET/CT in patients with gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis Xiao, Jiarui Jin, Yizi Nie, Ji Chen, Fukun Ma, Xuelei BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography (PET) and PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging with 3,4-dihydroxy-6-[(18)F] fluoro-L-phenylalanine ((18)F-FDOPA) has been used in the evaluation of gliomas. We performed a meta-analysis to obtain the diagnostic and grading accuracy of (18)F-FDOPA PET and PET/CT in patients with gliomas. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched through 13 May 2019. We included studies reporting the diagnostic performance of (18)F-FDOPA PET or PET/CT in glioma patients. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve were calculated from eligible studies on a per-lesion basis. RESULTS: Eventually, 19 studies were included. Across 13 studies (370 patients) for glioma diagnosis, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of (18)F-FDOPA PET and PET/CT were 0.90 (95%CI: 0.86–0.93) and 0.75 (95%CI: 0.65–0.83). Across 7 studies (219 patients) for glioma grading, (18)F-FDOPA PET and PET/CT showed a pooled sensitivity of 0.88 (95%CI: 0.81–0.93) and a pooled specificity of 0.73 (95%CI: 0.64–0.81). CONCLUSIONS: (18)F-FDOPA PET and PET/CT demonstrated good performance for diagnosing gliomas and differentiating high-grade gliomas (HGGs) from low-grade gliomas (LGGs). Further studies implementing standardized PET protocols and investigating the grading parameters are needed. BioMed Central 2019-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6683403/ /pubmed/31382920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5938-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Xiao, Jiarui
Jin, Yizi
Nie, Ji
Chen, Fukun
Ma, Xuelei
Diagnostic and grading accuracy of (18)F-FDOPA PET and PET/CT in patients with gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Diagnostic and grading accuracy of (18)F-FDOPA PET and PET/CT in patients with gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Diagnostic and grading accuracy of (18)F-FDOPA PET and PET/CT in patients with gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Diagnostic and grading accuracy of (18)F-FDOPA PET and PET/CT in patients with gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic and grading accuracy of (18)F-FDOPA PET and PET/CT in patients with gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Diagnostic and grading accuracy of (18)F-FDOPA PET and PET/CT in patients with gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort diagnostic and grading accuracy of (18)f-fdopa pet and pet/ct in patients with gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6683403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31382920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5938-0
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaojiarui diagnosticandgradingaccuracyof18ffdopapetandpetctinpatientswithgliomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jinyizi diagnosticandgradingaccuracyof18ffdopapetandpetctinpatientswithgliomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nieji diagnosticandgradingaccuracyof18ffdopapetandpetctinpatientswithgliomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenfukun diagnosticandgradingaccuracyof18ffdopapetandpetctinpatientswithgliomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT maxuelei diagnosticandgradingaccuracyof18ffdopapetandpetctinpatientswithgliomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis