Cargando…

A methodology for deriving the sensitivity of pooled testing, based on viral load progression and pooling dilution

BACKGROUND: Pooled testing, in which biological specimens from multiple subjects are combined into a testing pool and tested via a single test, is a common testing method for both surveillance and screening activities. The sensitivity of pooled testing for various pool sizes is an essential input fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nguyen, Ngoc T., Aprahamian, Hrayer, Bish, Ebru K., Bish, Douglas R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6683472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31387586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-019-1992-2
_version_ 1783442099545309184
author Nguyen, Ngoc T.
Aprahamian, Hrayer
Bish, Ebru K.
Bish, Douglas R.
author_facet Nguyen, Ngoc T.
Aprahamian, Hrayer
Bish, Ebru K.
Bish, Douglas R.
author_sort Nguyen, Ngoc T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pooled testing, in which biological specimens from multiple subjects are combined into a testing pool and tested via a single test, is a common testing method for both surveillance and screening activities. The sensitivity of pooled testing for various pool sizes is an essential input for surveillance and screening optimization, including testing pool design. However, clinical data on test sensitivity values for different pool sizes are limited, and do not provide a functional relationship between test sensitivity and pool size. We develop a novel methodology to accurately compute the sensitivity of pooled testing, while accounting for viral load progression and pooling dilution. We demonstrate our methodology on the nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT) technology for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). METHODS: Our methodology integrates mathematical models of viral load progression and pooling dilution to derive test sensitivity values for various pool sizes. This methodology derives the conditional test sensitivity, conditioned on the number of infected specimens in a pool, and uses the law of total probability, along with higher dimensional integrals, to derive pooled test sensitivity values. We also develop a highly accurate and easy-to-compute approximation function for pooled test sensitivity of the HIV ULTRIO Plus NAT Assay. We calibrate model parameters using published efficacy data for the HIV ULTRIO Plus NAT Assay, and clinical data on viral RNA load progression in HIV-infected patients, and use this methodology to derive and validate the sensitivity of the HIV ULTRIO Plus Assay for various pool sizes. RESULTS: We demonstrate the value of this methodology through optimal testing pool design for HIV prevalence estimation in Sub-Saharan Africa. This case study indicates that the optimal testing pool design is highly efficient, and outperforms a benchmark pool design. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed methodology accounts for both viral load progression and pooling dilution, and is computationally tractable. We calibrate this model for the HIV ULTRIO Plus NAT Assay, show that it provides highly accurate sensitivity estimates for various pool sizes, and, thus, yields efficient testing pool design for HIV prevalence estimation. Our model is generic, and can be calibrated for other infections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6683472
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66834722019-08-09 A methodology for deriving the sensitivity of pooled testing, based on viral load progression and pooling dilution Nguyen, Ngoc T. Aprahamian, Hrayer Bish, Ebru K. Bish, Douglas R. J Transl Med Research BACKGROUND: Pooled testing, in which biological specimens from multiple subjects are combined into a testing pool and tested via a single test, is a common testing method for both surveillance and screening activities. The sensitivity of pooled testing for various pool sizes is an essential input for surveillance and screening optimization, including testing pool design. However, clinical data on test sensitivity values for different pool sizes are limited, and do not provide a functional relationship between test sensitivity and pool size. We develop a novel methodology to accurately compute the sensitivity of pooled testing, while accounting for viral load progression and pooling dilution. We demonstrate our methodology on the nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT) technology for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). METHODS: Our methodology integrates mathematical models of viral load progression and pooling dilution to derive test sensitivity values for various pool sizes. This methodology derives the conditional test sensitivity, conditioned on the number of infected specimens in a pool, and uses the law of total probability, along with higher dimensional integrals, to derive pooled test sensitivity values. We also develop a highly accurate and easy-to-compute approximation function for pooled test sensitivity of the HIV ULTRIO Plus NAT Assay. We calibrate model parameters using published efficacy data for the HIV ULTRIO Plus NAT Assay, and clinical data on viral RNA load progression in HIV-infected patients, and use this methodology to derive and validate the sensitivity of the HIV ULTRIO Plus Assay for various pool sizes. RESULTS: We demonstrate the value of this methodology through optimal testing pool design for HIV prevalence estimation in Sub-Saharan Africa. This case study indicates that the optimal testing pool design is highly efficient, and outperforms a benchmark pool design. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed methodology accounts for both viral load progression and pooling dilution, and is computationally tractable. We calibrate this model for the HIV ULTRIO Plus NAT Assay, show that it provides highly accurate sensitivity estimates for various pool sizes, and, thus, yields efficient testing pool design for HIV prevalence estimation. Our model is generic, and can be calibrated for other infections. BioMed Central 2019-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6683472/ /pubmed/31387586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-019-1992-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Nguyen, Ngoc T.
Aprahamian, Hrayer
Bish, Ebru K.
Bish, Douglas R.
A methodology for deriving the sensitivity of pooled testing, based on viral load progression and pooling dilution
title A methodology for deriving the sensitivity of pooled testing, based on viral load progression and pooling dilution
title_full A methodology for deriving the sensitivity of pooled testing, based on viral load progression and pooling dilution
title_fullStr A methodology for deriving the sensitivity of pooled testing, based on viral load progression and pooling dilution
title_full_unstemmed A methodology for deriving the sensitivity of pooled testing, based on viral load progression and pooling dilution
title_short A methodology for deriving the sensitivity of pooled testing, based on viral load progression and pooling dilution
title_sort methodology for deriving the sensitivity of pooled testing, based on viral load progression and pooling dilution
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6683472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31387586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-019-1992-2
work_keys_str_mv AT nguyenngoct amethodologyforderivingthesensitivityofpooledtestingbasedonviralloadprogressionandpoolingdilution
AT aprahamianhrayer amethodologyforderivingthesensitivityofpooledtestingbasedonviralloadprogressionandpoolingdilution
AT bishebruk amethodologyforderivingthesensitivityofpooledtestingbasedonviralloadprogressionandpoolingdilution
AT bishdouglasr amethodologyforderivingthesensitivityofpooledtestingbasedonviralloadprogressionandpoolingdilution
AT nguyenngoct methodologyforderivingthesensitivityofpooledtestingbasedonviralloadprogressionandpoolingdilution
AT aprahamianhrayer methodologyforderivingthesensitivityofpooledtestingbasedonviralloadprogressionandpoolingdilution
AT bishebruk methodologyforderivingthesensitivityofpooledtestingbasedonviralloadprogressionandpoolingdilution
AT bishdouglasr methodologyforderivingthesensitivityofpooledtestingbasedonviralloadprogressionandpoolingdilution