Cargando…

Management of lethal recessive alleles in beef cattle through the use of mate selection software

BACKGROUND: Recessive loss-of-function (LOF) alleles at genes which are essential for life, can result in early embryonic mortality. Cattle producers can use the LOF carrier status of individual animals to make selection and mate allocation decisions. METHODS: Two beef cattle breeding strategies i.e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Upperman, Lindsay R., Kinghorn, Brian P., MacNeil, Michael D., Van Eenennaam, Alison L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6683482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31382878
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-019-0477-3
_version_ 1783442101875245056
author Upperman, Lindsay R.
Kinghorn, Brian P.
MacNeil, Michael D.
Van Eenennaam, Alison L.
author_facet Upperman, Lindsay R.
Kinghorn, Brian P.
MacNeil, Michael D.
Van Eenennaam, Alison L.
author_sort Upperman, Lindsay R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recessive loss-of-function (LOF) alleles at genes which are essential for life, can result in early embryonic mortality. Cattle producers can use the LOF carrier status of individual animals to make selection and mate allocation decisions. METHODS: Two beef cattle breeding strategies i.e. (1) selection against LOF carriers as parents and (2) simultaneous selection and mate allocation to avoid the occurrence of homozygous offspring in three scenarios, which differed in number and frequency of LOF alleles were evaluated using the mate selection program, MateSel. Scenarios included (a) seven loci with high-frequency LOF alleles, (b) 76 loci with low-frequency LOF alleles, and (c) 50 loci with random high- and low-frequency LOF alleles. In addition, any savings resulting from the information obtained by varying the percentage (0–100%) of the herd genotyped, together with segregation analysis to cover ungenotyped animals, were calculated to determine (1) which percentage optimized net profit for a fixed cost of genotyping ($30/test), and (2) the breakeven cost for genotyping. RESULTS: With full knowledge of the LOF alleles carried by selection candidates, the most profitable breeding strategy was always simultaneous selection and mate allocation to avoid homozygous affected offspring (aa) as compared to indiscriminate selection against carrier parents (Aa). The breakeven value of genotyping depended on the number of loci modeled, the LOF allele frequencies, and the mating/selection strategies used. Genotyping was most valuable when it was used to avoid otherwise high levels of embryonic mortalities. As the number of essential loci with LOF alleles increased, especially when some were present at relatively high minor allele frequencies, embryonic losses increased, and profit was maximized by genotyping 10 to 20% of a herd and using that information to reduce these losses. CONCLUSIONS: Genotyping 100% of the herd was never the most profitable outcome in any scenario; however, genotyping some proportion of the herd, together with segregation analysis to cover ungenotyped animals, maximized overall profit in scenarios with large numbers of loci with LOF alleles. As more LOF alleles are identified, such a mate selection software will likely be required to optimally select and allocate matings to balance the rate of genetic gain, embryonic losses, and inbreeding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6683482
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66834822019-08-09 Management of lethal recessive alleles in beef cattle through the use of mate selection software Upperman, Lindsay R. Kinghorn, Brian P. MacNeil, Michael D. Van Eenennaam, Alison L. Genet Sel Evol Research Article BACKGROUND: Recessive loss-of-function (LOF) alleles at genes which are essential for life, can result in early embryonic mortality. Cattle producers can use the LOF carrier status of individual animals to make selection and mate allocation decisions. METHODS: Two beef cattle breeding strategies i.e. (1) selection against LOF carriers as parents and (2) simultaneous selection and mate allocation to avoid the occurrence of homozygous offspring in three scenarios, which differed in number and frequency of LOF alleles were evaluated using the mate selection program, MateSel. Scenarios included (a) seven loci with high-frequency LOF alleles, (b) 76 loci with low-frequency LOF alleles, and (c) 50 loci with random high- and low-frequency LOF alleles. In addition, any savings resulting from the information obtained by varying the percentage (0–100%) of the herd genotyped, together with segregation analysis to cover ungenotyped animals, were calculated to determine (1) which percentage optimized net profit for a fixed cost of genotyping ($30/test), and (2) the breakeven cost for genotyping. RESULTS: With full knowledge of the LOF alleles carried by selection candidates, the most profitable breeding strategy was always simultaneous selection and mate allocation to avoid homozygous affected offspring (aa) as compared to indiscriminate selection against carrier parents (Aa). The breakeven value of genotyping depended on the number of loci modeled, the LOF allele frequencies, and the mating/selection strategies used. Genotyping was most valuable when it was used to avoid otherwise high levels of embryonic mortalities. As the number of essential loci with LOF alleles increased, especially when some were present at relatively high minor allele frequencies, embryonic losses increased, and profit was maximized by genotyping 10 to 20% of a herd and using that information to reduce these losses. CONCLUSIONS: Genotyping 100% of the herd was never the most profitable outcome in any scenario; however, genotyping some proportion of the herd, together with segregation analysis to cover ungenotyped animals, maximized overall profit in scenarios with large numbers of loci with LOF alleles. As more LOF alleles are identified, such a mate selection software will likely be required to optimally select and allocate matings to balance the rate of genetic gain, embryonic losses, and inbreeding. BioMed Central 2019-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6683482/ /pubmed/31382878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-019-0477-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Upperman, Lindsay R.
Kinghorn, Brian P.
MacNeil, Michael D.
Van Eenennaam, Alison L.
Management of lethal recessive alleles in beef cattle through the use of mate selection software
title Management of lethal recessive alleles in beef cattle through the use of mate selection software
title_full Management of lethal recessive alleles in beef cattle through the use of mate selection software
title_fullStr Management of lethal recessive alleles in beef cattle through the use of mate selection software
title_full_unstemmed Management of lethal recessive alleles in beef cattle through the use of mate selection software
title_short Management of lethal recessive alleles in beef cattle through the use of mate selection software
title_sort management of lethal recessive alleles in beef cattle through the use of mate selection software
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6683482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31382878
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-019-0477-3
work_keys_str_mv AT uppermanlindsayr managementoflethalrecessiveallelesinbeefcattlethroughtheuseofmateselectionsoftware
AT kinghornbrianp managementoflethalrecessiveallelesinbeefcattlethroughtheuseofmateselectionsoftware
AT macneilmichaeld managementoflethalrecessiveallelesinbeefcattlethroughtheuseofmateselectionsoftware
AT vaneenennaamalisonl managementoflethalrecessiveallelesinbeefcattlethroughtheuseofmateselectionsoftware