Cargando…

Can cost-effectiveness results be combined into a coherent league table? Case study from one high-income country

BACKGROUND: Doubts exist around the value of compiling league tables for cost-effectiveness results for health interventions, primarily due to methods differences. We aimed to determine if a reasonably coherent league table could be compiled using published studies for one high-income country: New Z...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilson, Nick, Davies, Anna, Brewer, Naomi, Nghiem, Nhung, Cobiac, Linda, Blakely, Tony
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6683509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31382954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12963-019-0192-x
_version_ 1783442108282044416
author Wilson, Nick
Davies, Anna
Brewer, Naomi
Nghiem, Nhung
Cobiac, Linda
Blakely, Tony
author_facet Wilson, Nick
Davies, Anna
Brewer, Naomi
Nghiem, Nhung
Cobiac, Linda
Blakely, Tony
author_sort Wilson, Nick
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Doubts exist around the value of compiling league tables for cost-effectiveness results for health interventions, primarily due to methods differences. We aimed to determine if a reasonably coherent league table could be compiled using published studies for one high-income country: New Zealand (NZ). METHODS: Literature searches were conducted to identify NZ-relevant studies published in the peer-reviewed journal literature between 1 January 2010 and 8 October 2017. Only studies with the following metrics were included: cost per quality-adjusted life-year or disability-adjusted life-year or life-year (QALY/DALY/LY). Key study features were abstracted and a summary league table produced which classified the studies in terms of cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: A total of 21 cost-effectiveness studies which met the inclusion criteria were identified. There were some large methodological differences between the studies, particularly in the time horizon (1 year to lifetime) but also discount rates (range 0 to 10%). Nevertheless, we were able to group the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) into general categories of being reported as cost-saving (19%), cost-effective (71%), and not cost-effective (10%). The median ICER (adjusted to 2017 NZ$) was ~ $5000 per QALY/DALY/LY (~US$3500). However, for some interventions, there is high uncertainty around the intervention effectiveness and declining adherence over time. CONCLUSIONS: It seemed possible to produce a reasonably coherent league table for the ICER values from different studies (within broad groupings) in this high-income country. Most interventions were cost-effective and a fifth were cost-saving. Nevertheless, study methodologies did vary widely and researchers need to pay more attention to using standardised methods that allow their results to be included in future league tables. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12963-019-0192-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6683509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66835092019-08-09 Can cost-effectiveness results be combined into a coherent league table? Case study from one high-income country Wilson, Nick Davies, Anna Brewer, Naomi Nghiem, Nhung Cobiac, Linda Blakely, Tony Popul Health Metr Research BACKGROUND: Doubts exist around the value of compiling league tables for cost-effectiveness results for health interventions, primarily due to methods differences. We aimed to determine if a reasonably coherent league table could be compiled using published studies for one high-income country: New Zealand (NZ). METHODS: Literature searches were conducted to identify NZ-relevant studies published in the peer-reviewed journal literature between 1 January 2010 and 8 October 2017. Only studies with the following metrics were included: cost per quality-adjusted life-year or disability-adjusted life-year or life-year (QALY/DALY/LY). Key study features were abstracted and a summary league table produced which classified the studies in terms of cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: A total of 21 cost-effectiveness studies which met the inclusion criteria were identified. There were some large methodological differences between the studies, particularly in the time horizon (1 year to lifetime) but also discount rates (range 0 to 10%). Nevertheless, we were able to group the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) into general categories of being reported as cost-saving (19%), cost-effective (71%), and not cost-effective (10%). The median ICER (adjusted to 2017 NZ$) was ~ $5000 per QALY/DALY/LY (~US$3500). However, for some interventions, there is high uncertainty around the intervention effectiveness and declining adherence over time. CONCLUSIONS: It seemed possible to produce a reasonably coherent league table for the ICER values from different studies (within broad groupings) in this high-income country. Most interventions were cost-effective and a fifth were cost-saving. Nevertheless, study methodologies did vary widely and researchers need to pay more attention to using standardised methods that allow their results to be included in future league tables. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12963-019-0192-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6683509/ /pubmed/31382954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12963-019-0192-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Wilson, Nick
Davies, Anna
Brewer, Naomi
Nghiem, Nhung
Cobiac, Linda
Blakely, Tony
Can cost-effectiveness results be combined into a coherent league table? Case study from one high-income country
title Can cost-effectiveness results be combined into a coherent league table? Case study from one high-income country
title_full Can cost-effectiveness results be combined into a coherent league table? Case study from one high-income country
title_fullStr Can cost-effectiveness results be combined into a coherent league table? Case study from one high-income country
title_full_unstemmed Can cost-effectiveness results be combined into a coherent league table? Case study from one high-income country
title_short Can cost-effectiveness results be combined into a coherent league table? Case study from one high-income country
title_sort can cost-effectiveness results be combined into a coherent league table? case study from one high-income country
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6683509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31382954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12963-019-0192-x
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsonnick cancosteffectivenessresultsbecombinedintoacoherentleaguetablecasestudyfromonehighincomecountry
AT daviesanna cancosteffectivenessresultsbecombinedintoacoherentleaguetablecasestudyfromonehighincomecountry
AT brewernaomi cancosteffectivenessresultsbecombinedintoacoherentleaguetablecasestudyfromonehighincomecountry
AT nghiemnhung cancosteffectivenessresultsbecombinedintoacoherentleaguetablecasestudyfromonehighincomecountry
AT cobiaclinda cancosteffectivenessresultsbecombinedintoacoherentleaguetablecasestudyfromonehighincomecountry
AT blakelytony cancosteffectivenessresultsbecombinedintoacoherentleaguetablecasestudyfromonehighincomecountry