Cargando…

A routine blood test-associated predictive model and application for tuberculosis diagnosis: a retrospective cohort study from northwest China

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to use the results of routine blood tests and relevant parameters to construct models for the prediction of active tuberculosis (ATB) and drug-resistant tuberculosis (DRTB) and to assess the diagnostic values of these models. METHODS: We performed logistic regression ana...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Kui, Liu, Sheng-Xi, Yang, Cai-Yong, Jiang, Zi-Cheng, Liu, Jun, Fan, Chuan-Qi, Li, Tao, Dong, Xue-Min, Wang, Jing, Ran, Ren-Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6683917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31154881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060519851673
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to use the results of routine blood tests and relevant parameters to construct models for the prediction of active tuberculosis (ATB) and drug-resistant tuberculosis (DRTB) and to assess the diagnostic values of these models. METHODS: We performed logistic regression analysis to generate models of plateletcrit-albumin scoring (PAS) and platelet distribution width-treatment-sputum scoring (PTS). Area under the curve (AUC) analysis was used to analyze the diagnostic values of these curves. Finally, we performed model validation and application assessment. RESULTS: In the training cohort, for the PAS model, the AUC for diagnosing ATB was 0.902, sensitivity was 82.75%, specificity was 82.20%, accuracy rate was 81.00%, and optimal threshold value was 0.199. For the PTS model, the AUC for diagnosing DRTB was 0.700, sensitivity was 63.64%, specificity was 73.53%, accuracy rate was 89.00%, and optimal threshold value was −2.202. These two models showed significant differences in the AUC analysis, compared with single-factor models. Results in the validation cohort were similar. CONCLUSIONS: The PAS model had high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of ATB, and the PTS model had strong predictive potential for the diagnosis of DRTB.