Cargando…

Correlation between umbilical cord length and gross fetal movement as counted by a fetal movement acceleration measurement recorder

INTRODUCTION: The fetal movement acceleration measurement (FMAM) recorder has made it possible to count gross fetal movements over many hours. Our purpose was to examine the relationship between umbilical cord length and fetal movements as counted by the FMAM recorder. METHODS: Sixty-two pregnant wo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ryo, Eiji, Kamata, Hideo, Seto, Michiharu, Morita, Masayoshi, Yatsuki, Keita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6683969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31396590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100003
_version_ 1783442195379912704
author Ryo, Eiji
Kamata, Hideo
Seto, Michiharu
Morita, Masayoshi
Yatsuki, Keita
author_facet Ryo, Eiji
Kamata, Hideo
Seto, Michiharu
Morita, Masayoshi
Yatsuki, Keita
author_sort Ryo, Eiji
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The fetal movement acceleration measurement (FMAM) recorder has made it possible to count gross fetal movements over many hours. Our purpose was to examine the relationship between umbilical cord length and fetal movements as counted by the FMAM recorder. METHODS: Sixty-two pregnant women recorded fetal movements weekly from 28 weeks to term. The ratio of 10-s periods in which movement occurred to total time was calculated as a movement index. Umbilical cord length was measured at delivery. (1) Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted with six explanatory variables (primipara / multipara, anterior / posterior located placenta, placental weight, the mean movement index of 28–31, 32–35, and 36–39 week) and a response valuable (umbilical cord length). (2) All women were divided into groups of shorter, middle, and longer cord length, specifically less than 50 cm, between 50 and 60 cm, and more than 60 cm. The movement index was compared among the three groups at 28–31, 32–35, and 36–39 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 2355.6 h from 368 night records were available. (1) There were no relationships between the cord length and the movement index of 28–31, 32–35, and 36–39 weeks (p = 0.090, 0.235, 0.129, respectively). (2) There were no differences in the movement index among the three groups at 28–31 and 32–35 gestational weeks (p = 0.096, and 0.465, respectively); however, the longer cord group had a greater movement index than the other two groups at 36–39 weeks (p = 0.0008). DISCUSSION: This study suggested that fetal movement near term is an important factor in determining whether cord length becomes relatively longer in normal pregnancies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6683969
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66839692019-08-08 Correlation between umbilical cord length and gross fetal movement as counted by a fetal movement acceleration measurement recorder Ryo, Eiji Kamata, Hideo Seto, Michiharu Morita, Masayoshi Yatsuki, Keita Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X Obstetrics and Maternal Fetal Medicine INTRODUCTION: The fetal movement acceleration measurement (FMAM) recorder has made it possible to count gross fetal movements over many hours. Our purpose was to examine the relationship between umbilical cord length and fetal movements as counted by the FMAM recorder. METHODS: Sixty-two pregnant women recorded fetal movements weekly from 28 weeks to term. The ratio of 10-s periods in which movement occurred to total time was calculated as a movement index. Umbilical cord length was measured at delivery. (1) Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted with six explanatory variables (primipara / multipara, anterior / posterior located placenta, placental weight, the mean movement index of 28–31, 32–35, and 36–39 week) and a response valuable (umbilical cord length). (2) All women were divided into groups of shorter, middle, and longer cord length, specifically less than 50 cm, between 50 and 60 cm, and more than 60 cm. The movement index was compared among the three groups at 28–31, 32–35, and 36–39 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 2355.6 h from 368 night records were available. (1) There were no relationships between the cord length and the movement index of 28–31, 32–35, and 36–39 weeks (p = 0.090, 0.235, 0.129, respectively). (2) There were no differences in the movement index among the three groups at 28–31 and 32–35 gestational weeks (p = 0.096, and 0.465, respectively); however, the longer cord group had a greater movement index than the other two groups at 36–39 weeks (p = 0.0008). DISCUSSION: This study suggested that fetal movement near term is an important factor in determining whether cord length becomes relatively longer in normal pregnancies. Elsevier 2019-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6683969/ /pubmed/31396590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100003 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Maternal Fetal Medicine
Ryo, Eiji
Kamata, Hideo
Seto, Michiharu
Morita, Masayoshi
Yatsuki, Keita
Correlation between umbilical cord length and gross fetal movement as counted by a fetal movement acceleration measurement recorder
title Correlation between umbilical cord length and gross fetal movement as counted by a fetal movement acceleration measurement recorder
title_full Correlation between umbilical cord length and gross fetal movement as counted by a fetal movement acceleration measurement recorder
title_fullStr Correlation between umbilical cord length and gross fetal movement as counted by a fetal movement acceleration measurement recorder
title_full_unstemmed Correlation between umbilical cord length and gross fetal movement as counted by a fetal movement acceleration measurement recorder
title_short Correlation between umbilical cord length and gross fetal movement as counted by a fetal movement acceleration measurement recorder
title_sort correlation between umbilical cord length and gross fetal movement as counted by a fetal movement acceleration measurement recorder
topic Obstetrics and Maternal Fetal Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6683969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31396590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100003
work_keys_str_mv AT ryoeiji correlationbetweenumbilicalcordlengthandgrossfetalmovementascountedbyafetalmovementaccelerationmeasurementrecorder
AT kamatahideo correlationbetweenumbilicalcordlengthandgrossfetalmovementascountedbyafetalmovementaccelerationmeasurementrecorder
AT setomichiharu correlationbetweenumbilicalcordlengthandgrossfetalmovementascountedbyafetalmovementaccelerationmeasurementrecorder
AT moritamasayoshi correlationbetweenumbilicalcordlengthandgrossfetalmovementascountedbyafetalmovementaccelerationmeasurementrecorder
AT yatsukikeita correlationbetweenumbilicalcordlengthandgrossfetalmovementascountedbyafetalmovementaccelerationmeasurementrecorder