Cargando…

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSCP) using an ultra-lightweight polypropylene mesh()

OBJECTIVES: Since 2005 the preferred method for surgical treatment of vaginal vault prolapse within the department has been laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with an ultra-lightweight polypropylene mesh. The study aimed to explore the functional and anatomical outcomes and mesh adverse events of women fol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dwyer, Lucy, Kumakech, Wilfred, Ward, Karen, Reid, Fiona, Smith, Anthony
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6683979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31396595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100008
_version_ 1783442197692022784
author Dwyer, Lucy
Kumakech, Wilfred
Ward, Karen
Reid, Fiona
Smith, Anthony
author_facet Dwyer, Lucy
Kumakech, Wilfred
Ward, Karen
Reid, Fiona
Smith, Anthony
author_sort Dwyer, Lucy
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Since 2005 the preferred method for surgical treatment of vaginal vault prolapse within the department has been laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with an ultra-lightweight polypropylene mesh. The study aimed to explore the functional and anatomical outcomes and mesh adverse events of women following this procedure. STUDY DESIGN: All women who had a Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy (LSCP) using an ultra-lightweight (19 g/m(2)) polypropylene mesh in two units in the North West of England between March 2005 and January 2013 (n = 238) were invited to participate in the study. Functional outcome data was collected using the Patient Global Impression Questionnaire (PGI-I), the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) and the Electronic Personal Assessment Questionnaire (EPAQ) post-operatively. Anatomical outcome was assessed by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q) measurement. A mesh palpability assessment was performed and any mesh complications were recorded using the International Continence Society/International Urogynecology Association (ICS/IUGA) classification system. The results were compared to those in our previously published series using the same surgical technique but a standard weight mesh (82.5 g/m(2)). RESULTS: 89% of participants reported that they felt their post-operative condition had improved. POP-Q results revealed that the median position of C changed from −3 pre-op to −7 post-operatively. Mesh was palpable during vaginal examination in only 3 women (3%). No mesh extrusion was identified during the study. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates that LSCP performed with an ultra-lightweight polypropylene mesh improves women’s functional and anatomical symptoms and appears to have a low risk of mesh extrusion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6683979
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66839792019-08-08 Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSCP) using an ultra-lightweight polypropylene mesh() Dwyer, Lucy Kumakech, Wilfred Ward, Karen Reid, Fiona Smith, Anthony Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X Urogynaecology OBJECTIVES: Since 2005 the preferred method for surgical treatment of vaginal vault prolapse within the department has been laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with an ultra-lightweight polypropylene mesh. The study aimed to explore the functional and anatomical outcomes and mesh adverse events of women following this procedure. STUDY DESIGN: All women who had a Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy (LSCP) using an ultra-lightweight (19 g/m(2)) polypropylene mesh in two units in the North West of England between March 2005 and January 2013 (n = 238) were invited to participate in the study. Functional outcome data was collected using the Patient Global Impression Questionnaire (PGI-I), the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) and the Electronic Personal Assessment Questionnaire (EPAQ) post-operatively. Anatomical outcome was assessed by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q) measurement. A mesh palpability assessment was performed and any mesh complications were recorded using the International Continence Society/International Urogynecology Association (ICS/IUGA) classification system. The results were compared to those in our previously published series using the same surgical technique but a standard weight mesh (82.5 g/m(2)). RESULTS: 89% of participants reported that they felt their post-operative condition had improved. POP-Q results revealed that the median position of C changed from −3 pre-op to −7 post-operatively. Mesh was palpable during vaginal examination in only 3 women (3%). No mesh extrusion was identified during the study. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates that LSCP performed with an ultra-lightweight polypropylene mesh improves women’s functional and anatomical symptoms and appears to have a low risk of mesh extrusion. Elsevier 2019-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6683979/ /pubmed/31396595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100008 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Urogynaecology
Dwyer, Lucy
Kumakech, Wilfred
Ward, Karen
Reid, Fiona
Smith, Anthony
Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSCP) using an ultra-lightweight polypropylene mesh()
title Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSCP) using an ultra-lightweight polypropylene mesh()
title_full Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSCP) using an ultra-lightweight polypropylene mesh()
title_fullStr Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSCP) using an ultra-lightweight polypropylene mesh()
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSCP) using an ultra-lightweight polypropylene mesh()
title_short Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSCP) using an ultra-lightweight polypropylene mesh()
title_sort laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (lscp) using an ultra-lightweight polypropylene mesh()
topic Urogynaecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6683979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31396595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100008
work_keys_str_mv AT dwyerlucy laparoscopicsacrocolpopexylscpusinganultralightweightpolypropylenemesh
AT kumakechwilfred laparoscopicsacrocolpopexylscpusinganultralightweightpolypropylenemesh
AT wardkaren laparoscopicsacrocolpopexylscpusinganultralightweightpolypropylenemesh
AT reidfiona laparoscopicsacrocolpopexylscpusinganultralightweightpolypropylenemesh
AT smithanthony laparoscopicsacrocolpopexylscpusinganultralightweightpolypropylenemesh