Cargando…
An efficacy evaluation method for non-normal outcomes in randomized controlled trials
Randomized controlled trials (RCT) are widely used in clinical efficacy evaluation studies. Linear regression is a general method to evaluate treatment efficacy considering the existence of confounding variables. However, when residuals are not normally distributed, parameter estimation based on ord...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6684529/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31388034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47727-y |
_version_ | 1783442261012381696 |
---|---|
author | Li, Yang Zhang, Zhang Feng, Qian Yi, Danhui Lu, Fang |
author_facet | Li, Yang Zhang, Zhang Feng, Qian Yi, Danhui Lu, Fang |
author_sort | Li, Yang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Randomized controlled trials (RCT) are widely used in clinical efficacy evaluation studies. Linear regression is a general method to evaluate treatment efficacy considering the existence of confounding variables. However, when residuals are not normally distributed, parameter estimation based on ordinary least squares (OLS) is inefficient. This study introduces an exponential squared loss (ESL) model to evaluate treatment effect. The proposed method provides robust estimation for non-normal data. Simulation results show that it outperforms ordinary least squares regression with contaminated data. In the mild cognitive impairment (MCI) efficacy evaluation study with traditional Chinese medicine, our method is applied to construct a linear efficacy evaluation model for the difference in Alzheimer’s disease assessment scale-cognitive (ADAS-cog) scores between the final and baseline records (ADASFA), with the existence of confounding factors and non- normal residuals. The results coincide with existing medical literatures. This proposed method overcomes the limitation of confounding variables and non-normal residuals in RCT efficacy studies. It outperforms OLS on estimation efficiency in situations where the percentage of non-normal contamination reaches 30%. These advantages make it a good method for real-world clinical studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6684529 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66845292019-08-11 An efficacy evaluation method for non-normal outcomes in randomized controlled trials Li, Yang Zhang, Zhang Feng, Qian Yi, Danhui Lu, Fang Sci Rep Article Randomized controlled trials (RCT) are widely used in clinical efficacy evaluation studies. Linear regression is a general method to evaluate treatment efficacy considering the existence of confounding variables. However, when residuals are not normally distributed, parameter estimation based on ordinary least squares (OLS) is inefficient. This study introduces an exponential squared loss (ESL) model to evaluate treatment effect. The proposed method provides robust estimation for non-normal data. Simulation results show that it outperforms ordinary least squares regression with contaminated data. In the mild cognitive impairment (MCI) efficacy evaluation study with traditional Chinese medicine, our method is applied to construct a linear efficacy evaluation model for the difference in Alzheimer’s disease assessment scale-cognitive (ADAS-cog) scores between the final and baseline records (ADASFA), with the existence of confounding factors and non- normal residuals. The results coincide with existing medical literatures. This proposed method overcomes the limitation of confounding variables and non-normal residuals in RCT efficacy studies. It outperforms OLS on estimation efficiency in situations where the percentage of non-normal contamination reaches 30%. These advantages make it a good method for real-world clinical studies. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6684529/ /pubmed/31388034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47727-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Li, Yang Zhang, Zhang Feng, Qian Yi, Danhui Lu, Fang An efficacy evaluation method for non-normal outcomes in randomized controlled trials |
title | An efficacy evaluation method for non-normal outcomes in randomized controlled trials |
title_full | An efficacy evaluation method for non-normal outcomes in randomized controlled trials |
title_fullStr | An efficacy evaluation method for non-normal outcomes in randomized controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | An efficacy evaluation method for non-normal outcomes in randomized controlled trials |
title_short | An efficacy evaluation method for non-normal outcomes in randomized controlled trials |
title_sort | efficacy evaluation method for non-normal outcomes in randomized controlled trials |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6684529/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31388034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47727-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liyang anefficacyevaluationmethodfornonnormaloutcomesinrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT zhangzhang anefficacyevaluationmethodfornonnormaloutcomesinrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT fengqian anefficacyevaluationmethodfornonnormaloutcomesinrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT yidanhui anefficacyevaluationmethodfornonnormaloutcomesinrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT lufang anefficacyevaluationmethodfornonnormaloutcomesinrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT liyang efficacyevaluationmethodfornonnormaloutcomesinrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT zhangzhang efficacyevaluationmethodfornonnormaloutcomesinrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT fengqian efficacyevaluationmethodfornonnormaloutcomesinrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT yidanhui efficacyevaluationmethodfornonnormaloutcomesinrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT lufang efficacyevaluationmethodfornonnormaloutcomesinrandomizedcontrolledtrials |