Cargando…

An efficacy evaluation method for non-normal outcomes in randomized controlled trials

Randomized controlled trials (RCT) are widely used in clinical efficacy evaluation studies. Linear regression is a general method to evaluate treatment efficacy considering the existence of confounding variables. However, when residuals are not normally distributed, parameter estimation based on ord...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Yang, Zhang, Zhang, Feng, Qian, Yi, Danhui, Lu, Fang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6684529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31388034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47727-y
_version_ 1783442261012381696
author Li, Yang
Zhang, Zhang
Feng, Qian
Yi, Danhui
Lu, Fang
author_facet Li, Yang
Zhang, Zhang
Feng, Qian
Yi, Danhui
Lu, Fang
author_sort Li, Yang
collection PubMed
description Randomized controlled trials (RCT) are widely used in clinical efficacy evaluation studies. Linear regression is a general method to evaluate treatment efficacy considering the existence of confounding variables. However, when residuals are not normally distributed, parameter estimation based on ordinary least squares (OLS) is inefficient. This study introduces an exponential squared loss (ESL) model to evaluate treatment effect. The proposed method provides robust estimation for non-normal data. Simulation results show that it outperforms ordinary least squares regression with contaminated data. In the mild cognitive impairment (MCI) efficacy evaluation study with traditional Chinese medicine, our method is applied to construct a linear efficacy evaluation model for the difference in Alzheimer’s disease assessment scale-cognitive (ADAS-cog) scores between the final and baseline records (ADASFA), with the existence of confounding factors and non- normal residuals. The results coincide with existing medical literatures. This proposed method overcomes the limitation of confounding variables and non-normal residuals in RCT efficacy studies. It outperforms OLS on estimation efficiency in situations where the percentage of non-normal contamination reaches 30%. These advantages make it a good method for real-world clinical studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6684529
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66845292019-08-11 An efficacy evaluation method for non-normal outcomes in randomized controlled trials Li, Yang Zhang, Zhang Feng, Qian Yi, Danhui Lu, Fang Sci Rep Article Randomized controlled trials (RCT) are widely used in clinical efficacy evaluation studies. Linear regression is a general method to evaluate treatment efficacy considering the existence of confounding variables. However, when residuals are not normally distributed, parameter estimation based on ordinary least squares (OLS) is inefficient. This study introduces an exponential squared loss (ESL) model to evaluate treatment effect. The proposed method provides robust estimation for non-normal data. Simulation results show that it outperforms ordinary least squares regression with contaminated data. In the mild cognitive impairment (MCI) efficacy evaluation study with traditional Chinese medicine, our method is applied to construct a linear efficacy evaluation model for the difference in Alzheimer’s disease assessment scale-cognitive (ADAS-cog) scores between the final and baseline records (ADASFA), with the existence of confounding factors and non- normal residuals. The results coincide with existing medical literatures. This proposed method overcomes the limitation of confounding variables and non-normal residuals in RCT efficacy studies. It outperforms OLS on estimation efficiency in situations where the percentage of non-normal contamination reaches 30%. These advantages make it a good method for real-world clinical studies. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6684529/ /pubmed/31388034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47727-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Li, Yang
Zhang, Zhang
Feng, Qian
Yi, Danhui
Lu, Fang
An efficacy evaluation method for non-normal outcomes in randomized controlled trials
title An efficacy evaluation method for non-normal outcomes in randomized controlled trials
title_full An efficacy evaluation method for non-normal outcomes in randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr An efficacy evaluation method for non-normal outcomes in randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed An efficacy evaluation method for non-normal outcomes in randomized controlled trials
title_short An efficacy evaluation method for non-normal outcomes in randomized controlled trials
title_sort efficacy evaluation method for non-normal outcomes in randomized controlled trials
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6684529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31388034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47727-y
work_keys_str_mv AT liyang anefficacyevaluationmethodfornonnormaloutcomesinrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhangzhang anefficacyevaluationmethodfornonnormaloutcomesinrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT fengqian anefficacyevaluationmethodfornonnormaloutcomesinrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT yidanhui anefficacyevaluationmethodfornonnormaloutcomesinrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT lufang anefficacyevaluationmethodfornonnormaloutcomesinrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT liyang efficacyevaluationmethodfornonnormaloutcomesinrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhangzhang efficacyevaluationmethodfornonnormaloutcomesinrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT fengqian efficacyevaluationmethodfornonnormaloutcomesinrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT yidanhui efficacyevaluationmethodfornonnormaloutcomesinrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT lufang efficacyevaluationmethodfornonnormaloutcomesinrandomizedcontrolledtrials