Cargando…

Clinical prediction model for tumor progression in Barrett’s esophagus

BACKGROUND: Individuals with Barrett’s esophagus (BE) are at increased risk of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), but the cost-effectiveness of general surveillance of BE is low. This study aimed to identify a risk prediction model for tumor progression in individuals wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holmberg, Dag, Ness-Jensen, Eivind, Mattsson, Fredrik, Lagergren, Jesper
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6684532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30456503
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6590-5
_version_ 1783442261742190592
author Holmberg, Dag
Ness-Jensen, Eivind
Mattsson, Fredrik
Lagergren, Jesper
author_facet Holmberg, Dag
Ness-Jensen, Eivind
Mattsson, Fredrik
Lagergren, Jesper
author_sort Holmberg, Dag
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Individuals with Barrett’s esophagus (BE) are at increased risk of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), but the cost-effectiveness of general surveillance of BE is low. This study aimed to identify a risk prediction model for tumor progression in individuals with BE based on age, sex, and risk factors found at upper endoscopy, enabling tailored surveillance. METHODS: This nested case–control study originated from a cohort of 8171 adults diagnosed with BE in 2006–2013 in the Swedish Patient Registry. Cases had EAC/HGD (n = 279) as identified from the Swedish Cancer Registry, whereas controls had no EAC/HGD (n = 1089). Findings from endoscopy and histopathology reports were extracted from medical records at 71 Swedish hospitals and from the Swedish Patient Registry. Multivariable logistic regression provided odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Older age (OR 1.02 [95% CI 1.01–1.03] per year), male sex (OR 2.8 [95% CI 1.9–4.1]), and increasing maximum BE length (OR 2.3 [95% CI 1.4–3.9] for segments 3–8 cm and OR 4.3 [95% CI 2.5–7.2] for segments ≥ 8 cm) increased the risk of EAC/HGD, while the circumferential extent of the BE, hiatal hernia or reflux esophagitis did not. A model based on age, sex, and maximum BE length predicted 71% of all EAC/HGD cases. CONCLUSIONS: A simple combination of the variables age, sex and maximum BE length showed fairly good accuracy for predicting tumor progression in BE. This clinical risk prediction model may help to tailor future surveillance programs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-018-6590-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6684532
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66845322019-08-23 Clinical prediction model for tumor progression in Barrett’s esophagus Holmberg, Dag Ness-Jensen, Eivind Mattsson, Fredrik Lagergren, Jesper Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: Individuals with Barrett’s esophagus (BE) are at increased risk of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), but the cost-effectiveness of general surveillance of BE is low. This study aimed to identify a risk prediction model for tumor progression in individuals with BE based on age, sex, and risk factors found at upper endoscopy, enabling tailored surveillance. METHODS: This nested case–control study originated from a cohort of 8171 adults diagnosed with BE in 2006–2013 in the Swedish Patient Registry. Cases had EAC/HGD (n = 279) as identified from the Swedish Cancer Registry, whereas controls had no EAC/HGD (n = 1089). Findings from endoscopy and histopathology reports were extracted from medical records at 71 Swedish hospitals and from the Swedish Patient Registry. Multivariable logistic regression provided odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Older age (OR 1.02 [95% CI 1.01–1.03] per year), male sex (OR 2.8 [95% CI 1.9–4.1]), and increasing maximum BE length (OR 2.3 [95% CI 1.4–3.9] for segments 3–8 cm and OR 4.3 [95% CI 2.5–7.2] for segments ≥ 8 cm) increased the risk of EAC/HGD, while the circumferential extent of the BE, hiatal hernia or reflux esophagitis did not. A model based on age, sex, and maximum BE length predicted 71% of all EAC/HGD cases. CONCLUSIONS: A simple combination of the variables age, sex and maximum BE length showed fairly good accuracy for predicting tumor progression in BE. This clinical risk prediction model may help to tailor future surveillance programs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-018-6590-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2018-11-19 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6684532/ /pubmed/30456503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6590-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Holmberg, Dag
Ness-Jensen, Eivind
Mattsson, Fredrik
Lagergren, Jesper
Clinical prediction model for tumor progression in Barrett’s esophagus
title Clinical prediction model for tumor progression in Barrett’s esophagus
title_full Clinical prediction model for tumor progression in Barrett’s esophagus
title_fullStr Clinical prediction model for tumor progression in Barrett’s esophagus
title_full_unstemmed Clinical prediction model for tumor progression in Barrett’s esophagus
title_short Clinical prediction model for tumor progression in Barrett’s esophagus
title_sort clinical prediction model for tumor progression in barrett’s esophagus
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6684532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30456503
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6590-5
work_keys_str_mv AT holmbergdag clinicalpredictionmodelfortumorprogressioninbarrettsesophagus
AT nessjenseneivind clinicalpredictionmodelfortumorprogressioninbarrettsesophagus
AT mattssonfredrik clinicalpredictionmodelfortumorprogressioninbarrettsesophagus
AT lagergrenjesper clinicalpredictionmodelfortumorprogressioninbarrettsesophagus