Cargando…

Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Radiation Oncology: Initial Experience After Workflow Implementation

BACKGROUND: Mobile health (mHealth) technologies are increasingly used in various medical fields. However, the potential of mHealth to improve patient care in radiotherapy by acquiring electronic patient reported outcome measures (ePROMs) during treatment has been poorly studied so far. OBJECTIVE: T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hauth, Franziska, Bizu, Verena, App, Rehan, Lautenbacher, Heinrich, Tenev, Alina, Bitzer, Michael, Malek, Nisar Peter, Zips, Daniel, Gani, Cihan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6685133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31342906
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/12345
_version_ 1783442347945623552
author Hauth, Franziska
Bizu, Verena
App, Rehan
Lautenbacher, Heinrich
Tenev, Alina
Bitzer, Michael
Malek, Nisar Peter
Zips, Daniel
Gani, Cihan
author_facet Hauth, Franziska
Bizu, Verena
App, Rehan
Lautenbacher, Heinrich
Tenev, Alina
Bitzer, Michael
Malek, Nisar Peter
Zips, Daniel
Gani, Cihan
author_sort Hauth, Franziska
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mobile health (mHealth) technologies are increasingly used in various medical fields. However, the potential of mHealth to improve patient care in radiotherapy by acquiring electronic patient reported outcome measures (ePROMs) during treatment has been poorly studied so far. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop and implement a novel Web app (PROMetheus) for patients undergoing radiotherapy. Herein, we have reported our experience with a focus on feasibility, patient acceptance, and a correlation of ePROMs with the clinical course of the patients. METHODS: In the period between January and June 2018, 21 patients used PROMetheus to score side effects, symptoms, and quality of life–related parameters during and after their treatment. Items of the Patient Reported Outcome version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) were chosen based on the primary site of disease, 27 items for head and neck tumors, 21 items for thoracic tumors, and 24 items for pelvic tumors. RESULTS: In total, 17 out of the 21 patients (81%) regularly submitted ePROMs and more than 2500 data points were acquired. An average of 5.2, 3.5, and 3.3 min was required to complete the head and neck, thorax, and pelvis questionnaires, respectively. ePROMS were able to detect the occurrence of both expected and unexpected side effects during the treatment. In addition, a gradual increase in the severity of side effects over the course the treatment and their remission afterward could be observed with ePROMs. In total, 9 out of the 17 patients (53%), mostly those with head and neck and thoracic cancers, reported PRO-CTCAE grade III or IV fatigue with severe impairments of activities of daily life. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the successful implementation of an ePROM system and a high patient acceptance. ePROMs have a great potential to improve patient care in radiotherapy by providing a comprehensive documentation of symptoms and side effects, especially of ones that are otherwise underreported.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6685133
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66851332019-08-20 Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Radiation Oncology: Initial Experience After Workflow Implementation Hauth, Franziska Bizu, Verena App, Rehan Lautenbacher, Heinrich Tenev, Alina Bitzer, Michael Malek, Nisar Peter Zips, Daniel Gani, Cihan JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Original Paper BACKGROUND: Mobile health (mHealth) technologies are increasingly used in various medical fields. However, the potential of mHealth to improve patient care in radiotherapy by acquiring electronic patient reported outcome measures (ePROMs) during treatment has been poorly studied so far. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop and implement a novel Web app (PROMetheus) for patients undergoing radiotherapy. Herein, we have reported our experience with a focus on feasibility, patient acceptance, and a correlation of ePROMs with the clinical course of the patients. METHODS: In the period between January and June 2018, 21 patients used PROMetheus to score side effects, symptoms, and quality of life–related parameters during and after their treatment. Items of the Patient Reported Outcome version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) were chosen based on the primary site of disease, 27 items for head and neck tumors, 21 items for thoracic tumors, and 24 items for pelvic tumors. RESULTS: In total, 17 out of the 21 patients (81%) regularly submitted ePROMs and more than 2500 data points were acquired. An average of 5.2, 3.5, and 3.3 min was required to complete the head and neck, thorax, and pelvis questionnaires, respectively. ePROMS were able to detect the occurrence of both expected and unexpected side effects during the treatment. In addition, a gradual increase in the severity of side effects over the course the treatment and their remission afterward could be observed with ePROMs. In total, 9 out of the 17 patients (53%), mostly those with head and neck and thoracic cancers, reported PRO-CTCAE grade III or IV fatigue with severe impairments of activities of daily life. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the successful implementation of an ePROM system and a high patient acceptance. ePROMs have a great potential to improve patient care in radiotherapy by providing a comprehensive documentation of symptoms and side effects, especially of ones that are otherwise underreported. JMIR Publications 2019-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6685133/ /pubmed/31342906 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/12345 Text en ©Franziska Hauth, Verena Bizu, Rehan App, Heinrich Lautenbacher, Alina Tenev, Michael Bitzer, Nisar Peter Malek, Daniel Zips, Cihan Gani. Originally published in JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 24.07.2019. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mhealth and uhealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Hauth, Franziska
Bizu, Verena
App, Rehan
Lautenbacher, Heinrich
Tenev, Alina
Bitzer, Michael
Malek, Nisar Peter
Zips, Daniel
Gani, Cihan
Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Radiation Oncology: Initial Experience After Workflow Implementation
title Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Radiation Oncology: Initial Experience After Workflow Implementation
title_full Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Radiation Oncology: Initial Experience After Workflow Implementation
title_fullStr Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Radiation Oncology: Initial Experience After Workflow Implementation
title_full_unstemmed Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Radiation Oncology: Initial Experience After Workflow Implementation
title_short Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Radiation Oncology: Initial Experience After Workflow Implementation
title_sort electronic patient-reported outcome measures in radiation oncology: initial experience after workflow implementation
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6685133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31342906
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/12345
work_keys_str_mv AT hauthfranziska electronicpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinradiationoncologyinitialexperienceafterworkflowimplementation
AT bizuverena electronicpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinradiationoncologyinitialexperienceafterworkflowimplementation
AT apprehan electronicpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinradiationoncologyinitialexperienceafterworkflowimplementation
AT lautenbacherheinrich electronicpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinradiationoncologyinitialexperienceafterworkflowimplementation
AT tenevalina electronicpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinradiationoncologyinitialexperienceafterworkflowimplementation
AT bitzermichael electronicpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinradiationoncologyinitialexperienceafterworkflowimplementation
AT maleknisarpeter electronicpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinradiationoncologyinitialexperienceafterworkflowimplementation
AT zipsdaniel electronicpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinradiationoncologyinitialexperienceafterworkflowimplementation
AT ganicihan electronicpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinradiationoncologyinitialexperienceafterworkflowimplementation