Cargando…
Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Radiation Oncology: Initial Experience After Workflow Implementation
BACKGROUND: Mobile health (mHealth) technologies are increasingly used in various medical fields. However, the potential of mHealth to improve patient care in radiotherapy by acquiring electronic patient reported outcome measures (ePROMs) during treatment has been poorly studied so far. OBJECTIVE: T...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6685133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31342906 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/12345 |
_version_ | 1783442347945623552 |
---|---|
author | Hauth, Franziska Bizu, Verena App, Rehan Lautenbacher, Heinrich Tenev, Alina Bitzer, Michael Malek, Nisar Peter Zips, Daniel Gani, Cihan |
author_facet | Hauth, Franziska Bizu, Verena App, Rehan Lautenbacher, Heinrich Tenev, Alina Bitzer, Michael Malek, Nisar Peter Zips, Daniel Gani, Cihan |
author_sort | Hauth, Franziska |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Mobile health (mHealth) technologies are increasingly used in various medical fields. However, the potential of mHealth to improve patient care in radiotherapy by acquiring electronic patient reported outcome measures (ePROMs) during treatment has been poorly studied so far. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop and implement a novel Web app (PROMetheus) for patients undergoing radiotherapy. Herein, we have reported our experience with a focus on feasibility, patient acceptance, and a correlation of ePROMs with the clinical course of the patients. METHODS: In the period between January and June 2018, 21 patients used PROMetheus to score side effects, symptoms, and quality of life–related parameters during and after their treatment. Items of the Patient Reported Outcome version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) were chosen based on the primary site of disease, 27 items for head and neck tumors, 21 items for thoracic tumors, and 24 items for pelvic tumors. RESULTS: In total, 17 out of the 21 patients (81%) regularly submitted ePROMs and more than 2500 data points were acquired. An average of 5.2, 3.5, and 3.3 min was required to complete the head and neck, thorax, and pelvis questionnaires, respectively. ePROMS were able to detect the occurrence of both expected and unexpected side effects during the treatment. In addition, a gradual increase in the severity of side effects over the course the treatment and their remission afterward could be observed with ePROMs. In total, 9 out of the 17 patients (53%), mostly those with head and neck and thoracic cancers, reported PRO-CTCAE grade III or IV fatigue with severe impairments of activities of daily life. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the successful implementation of an ePROM system and a high patient acceptance. ePROMs have a great potential to improve patient care in radiotherapy by providing a comprehensive documentation of symptoms and side effects, especially of ones that are otherwise underreported. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6685133 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66851332019-08-20 Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Radiation Oncology: Initial Experience After Workflow Implementation Hauth, Franziska Bizu, Verena App, Rehan Lautenbacher, Heinrich Tenev, Alina Bitzer, Michael Malek, Nisar Peter Zips, Daniel Gani, Cihan JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Original Paper BACKGROUND: Mobile health (mHealth) technologies are increasingly used in various medical fields. However, the potential of mHealth to improve patient care in radiotherapy by acquiring electronic patient reported outcome measures (ePROMs) during treatment has been poorly studied so far. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop and implement a novel Web app (PROMetheus) for patients undergoing radiotherapy. Herein, we have reported our experience with a focus on feasibility, patient acceptance, and a correlation of ePROMs with the clinical course of the patients. METHODS: In the period between January and June 2018, 21 patients used PROMetheus to score side effects, symptoms, and quality of life–related parameters during and after their treatment. Items of the Patient Reported Outcome version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) were chosen based on the primary site of disease, 27 items for head and neck tumors, 21 items for thoracic tumors, and 24 items for pelvic tumors. RESULTS: In total, 17 out of the 21 patients (81%) regularly submitted ePROMs and more than 2500 data points were acquired. An average of 5.2, 3.5, and 3.3 min was required to complete the head and neck, thorax, and pelvis questionnaires, respectively. ePROMS were able to detect the occurrence of both expected and unexpected side effects during the treatment. In addition, a gradual increase in the severity of side effects over the course the treatment and their remission afterward could be observed with ePROMs. In total, 9 out of the 17 patients (53%), mostly those with head and neck and thoracic cancers, reported PRO-CTCAE grade III or IV fatigue with severe impairments of activities of daily life. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the successful implementation of an ePROM system and a high patient acceptance. ePROMs have a great potential to improve patient care in radiotherapy by providing a comprehensive documentation of symptoms and side effects, especially of ones that are otherwise underreported. JMIR Publications 2019-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6685133/ /pubmed/31342906 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/12345 Text en ©Franziska Hauth, Verena Bizu, Rehan App, Heinrich Lautenbacher, Alina Tenev, Michael Bitzer, Nisar Peter Malek, Daniel Zips, Cihan Gani. Originally published in JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 24.07.2019. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mhealth and uhealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Hauth, Franziska Bizu, Verena App, Rehan Lautenbacher, Heinrich Tenev, Alina Bitzer, Michael Malek, Nisar Peter Zips, Daniel Gani, Cihan Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Radiation Oncology: Initial Experience After Workflow Implementation |
title | Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Radiation Oncology: Initial Experience After Workflow Implementation |
title_full | Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Radiation Oncology: Initial Experience After Workflow Implementation |
title_fullStr | Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Radiation Oncology: Initial Experience After Workflow Implementation |
title_full_unstemmed | Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Radiation Oncology: Initial Experience After Workflow Implementation |
title_short | Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Radiation Oncology: Initial Experience After Workflow Implementation |
title_sort | electronic patient-reported outcome measures in radiation oncology: initial experience after workflow implementation |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6685133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31342906 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/12345 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hauthfranziska electronicpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinradiationoncologyinitialexperienceafterworkflowimplementation AT bizuverena electronicpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinradiationoncologyinitialexperienceafterworkflowimplementation AT apprehan electronicpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinradiationoncologyinitialexperienceafterworkflowimplementation AT lautenbacherheinrich electronicpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinradiationoncologyinitialexperienceafterworkflowimplementation AT tenevalina electronicpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinradiationoncologyinitialexperienceafterworkflowimplementation AT bitzermichael electronicpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinradiationoncologyinitialexperienceafterworkflowimplementation AT maleknisarpeter electronicpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinradiationoncologyinitialexperienceafterworkflowimplementation AT zipsdaniel electronicpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinradiationoncologyinitialexperienceafterworkflowimplementation AT ganicihan electronicpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinradiationoncologyinitialexperienceafterworkflowimplementation |