Cargando…

No evidence of flowering synchronization upon floral volatiles for a short lived annual plant species: revisiting an appealing hypothesis

BACKGROUND: Self-incompatible plants require simultaneous flowering mates for crosspollination and reproduction. Though the presence of flowering conspecifics and pollination agents are important for reproductive success, so far no cues that signal the flowering state of potential mates have been id...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fricke, Ute, Lucas-Barbosa, Dani, Douma, Jacob C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6685148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31391049
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12898-019-0245-9
_version_ 1783442351197257728
author Fricke, Ute
Lucas-Barbosa, Dani
Douma, Jacob C.
author_facet Fricke, Ute
Lucas-Barbosa, Dani
Douma, Jacob C.
author_sort Fricke, Ute
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Self-incompatible plants require simultaneous flowering mates for crosspollination and reproduction. Though the presence of flowering conspecifics and pollination agents are important for reproductive success, so far no cues that signal the flowering state of potential mates have been identified. Here, we empirically tested the hypothesis that plant floral volatiles induce flowering synchrony among self-incompatible conspecifics by acceleration of flowering and flower opening rate of non-flowering conspecifics. We exposed Brassica rapa Maarssen, a self-incompatible, in rather dense patches growing annual, to (1) flowering or non-flowering conspecifics or to (2) floral volatiles of conspecifics by isolating plants in separate containers with a directional airflow. In the latter, odors emitted by non-flowering conspecifics were used as control. RESULTS: Date of first bud, duration of first flower bud, date of first flower, maximum number of open flowers and flower opening rate were not affected by the presence of conspecific flowering neighbors nor by floral volatiles directly. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents a compelling approach to empirically test the role of flower synchronization by floral volatiles and challenges the premises that are underlying this hypothesis. We argue that the life history of the plant as well as its interaction with pollinators and insect herbivores, as well as the distance over which volatiles may serve as synchronization cue, set constraints on the fitness benefits of synchronized flowering which needs to be taken into account when testing the role of floral volatiles in synchronized flowering. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12898-019-0245-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6685148
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66851482019-08-12 No evidence of flowering synchronization upon floral volatiles for a short lived annual plant species: revisiting an appealing hypothesis Fricke, Ute Lucas-Barbosa, Dani Douma, Jacob C. BMC Ecol Research Article BACKGROUND: Self-incompatible plants require simultaneous flowering mates for crosspollination and reproduction. Though the presence of flowering conspecifics and pollination agents are important for reproductive success, so far no cues that signal the flowering state of potential mates have been identified. Here, we empirically tested the hypothesis that plant floral volatiles induce flowering synchrony among self-incompatible conspecifics by acceleration of flowering and flower opening rate of non-flowering conspecifics. We exposed Brassica rapa Maarssen, a self-incompatible, in rather dense patches growing annual, to (1) flowering or non-flowering conspecifics or to (2) floral volatiles of conspecifics by isolating plants in separate containers with a directional airflow. In the latter, odors emitted by non-flowering conspecifics were used as control. RESULTS: Date of first bud, duration of first flower bud, date of first flower, maximum number of open flowers and flower opening rate were not affected by the presence of conspecific flowering neighbors nor by floral volatiles directly. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents a compelling approach to empirically test the role of flower synchronization by floral volatiles and challenges the premises that are underlying this hypothesis. We argue that the life history of the plant as well as its interaction with pollinators and insect herbivores, as well as the distance over which volatiles may serve as synchronization cue, set constraints on the fitness benefits of synchronized flowering which needs to be taken into account when testing the role of floral volatiles in synchronized flowering. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12898-019-0245-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6685148/ /pubmed/31391049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12898-019-0245-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fricke, Ute
Lucas-Barbosa, Dani
Douma, Jacob C.
No evidence of flowering synchronization upon floral volatiles for a short lived annual plant species: revisiting an appealing hypothesis
title No evidence of flowering synchronization upon floral volatiles for a short lived annual plant species: revisiting an appealing hypothesis
title_full No evidence of flowering synchronization upon floral volatiles for a short lived annual plant species: revisiting an appealing hypothesis
title_fullStr No evidence of flowering synchronization upon floral volatiles for a short lived annual plant species: revisiting an appealing hypothesis
title_full_unstemmed No evidence of flowering synchronization upon floral volatiles for a short lived annual plant species: revisiting an appealing hypothesis
title_short No evidence of flowering synchronization upon floral volatiles for a short lived annual plant species: revisiting an appealing hypothesis
title_sort no evidence of flowering synchronization upon floral volatiles for a short lived annual plant species: revisiting an appealing hypothesis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6685148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31391049
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12898-019-0245-9
work_keys_str_mv AT frickeute noevidenceoffloweringsynchronizationuponfloralvolatilesforashortlivedannualplantspeciesrevisitinganappealinghypothesis
AT lucasbarbosadani noevidenceoffloweringsynchronizationuponfloralvolatilesforashortlivedannualplantspeciesrevisitinganappealinghypothesis
AT doumajacobc noevidenceoffloweringsynchronizationuponfloralvolatilesforashortlivedannualplantspeciesrevisitinganappealinghypothesis