Cargando…

Systematic review and meta-analysis of public hospital efficiency studies in Gulf region and selected countries in similar settings

BACKGROUND: The assessment of hospital efficiency is attracting interest worldwide, particularly in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. The objective of this study was to review the literature on public hospital efficiency and synthesise the findings in GCC countries and comparable settings. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alatawi, Ahmed, Ahmed, Sayem, Niessen, Louis, Khan, Jahangir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6685225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31406487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-019-0185-4
_version_ 1783442361786826752
author Alatawi, Ahmed
Ahmed, Sayem
Niessen, Louis
Khan, Jahangir
author_facet Alatawi, Ahmed
Ahmed, Sayem
Niessen, Louis
Khan, Jahangir
author_sort Alatawi, Ahmed
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The assessment of hospital efficiency is attracting interest worldwide, particularly in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. The objective of this study was to review the literature on public hospital efficiency and synthesise the findings in GCC countries and comparable settings. METHODS: We systematically searched six scientific databases, references and grey literature for studies that measured the efficiency of public hospitals in appropriate countries, and followed PRISMA guidelines to present the results. We summarised the included studies in terms of samples, methods/technologies and findings, then assessed their quality. We meta-analysed the efficiency estimates using Spearman’s rank correlations and logistic regression, to examine the internal validity of the findings. RESULTS: We identified and meta-analysed 22 of 1128 studies. Four studies were conducted in GCC nations, 18 came from Iran and Turkey. The pooled technical-efficiency (TE) was 0.792 (SE ± 0.03). There were considerable variations in model specification, analysis orientation and variables used in the studies, which influenced efficiency estimates. The studies lacked some elements required in quality appraisal, achieving an average of 73%. Meta-analysis showed negative correlations between sample size and efficiency scores; the odd ratio was 0.081 (CI 0.005: 1.300; P value = 0.07) at 10% risk level. The choice of model orientation was significantly influenced (82%) by the studied countries’ income categories, which was compatible with the strategic plans of these countries. CONCLUSIONS: The studies showed methodological and qualitative deficiencies that limited their credibility. Our review suggested that methodology and assumption choices have a substantial impact on efficiency measurements. Given the GCC countries’ strategic plans and resource allocations, these nations need further efficiency research using high-quality data, different orientations and developed models. This will establish an evidence-based knowledge base appropriate for use in public hospital assessments, policy- and decision-making and the assurance of value for money.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6685225
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66852252019-08-12 Systematic review and meta-analysis of public hospital efficiency studies in Gulf region and selected countries in similar settings Alatawi, Ahmed Ahmed, Sayem Niessen, Louis Khan, Jahangir Cost Eff Resour Alloc Review BACKGROUND: The assessment of hospital efficiency is attracting interest worldwide, particularly in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. The objective of this study was to review the literature on public hospital efficiency and synthesise the findings in GCC countries and comparable settings. METHODS: We systematically searched six scientific databases, references and grey literature for studies that measured the efficiency of public hospitals in appropriate countries, and followed PRISMA guidelines to present the results. We summarised the included studies in terms of samples, methods/technologies and findings, then assessed their quality. We meta-analysed the efficiency estimates using Spearman’s rank correlations and logistic regression, to examine the internal validity of the findings. RESULTS: We identified and meta-analysed 22 of 1128 studies. Four studies were conducted in GCC nations, 18 came from Iran and Turkey. The pooled technical-efficiency (TE) was 0.792 (SE ± 0.03). There were considerable variations in model specification, analysis orientation and variables used in the studies, which influenced efficiency estimates. The studies lacked some elements required in quality appraisal, achieving an average of 73%. Meta-analysis showed negative correlations between sample size and efficiency scores; the odd ratio was 0.081 (CI 0.005: 1.300; P value = 0.07) at 10% risk level. The choice of model orientation was significantly influenced (82%) by the studied countries’ income categories, which was compatible with the strategic plans of these countries. CONCLUSIONS: The studies showed methodological and qualitative deficiencies that limited their credibility. Our review suggested that methodology and assumption choices have a substantial impact on efficiency measurements. Given the GCC countries’ strategic plans and resource allocations, these nations need further efficiency research using high-quality data, different orientations and developed models. This will establish an evidence-based knowledge base appropriate for use in public hospital assessments, policy- and decision-making and the assurance of value for money. BioMed Central 2019-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6685225/ /pubmed/31406487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-019-0185-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Alatawi, Ahmed
Ahmed, Sayem
Niessen, Louis
Khan, Jahangir
Systematic review and meta-analysis of public hospital efficiency studies in Gulf region and selected countries in similar settings
title Systematic review and meta-analysis of public hospital efficiency studies in Gulf region and selected countries in similar settings
title_full Systematic review and meta-analysis of public hospital efficiency studies in Gulf region and selected countries in similar settings
title_fullStr Systematic review and meta-analysis of public hospital efficiency studies in Gulf region and selected countries in similar settings
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review and meta-analysis of public hospital efficiency studies in Gulf region and selected countries in similar settings
title_short Systematic review and meta-analysis of public hospital efficiency studies in Gulf region and selected countries in similar settings
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis of public hospital efficiency studies in gulf region and selected countries in similar settings
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6685225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31406487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-019-0185-4
work_keys_str_mv AT alatawiahmed systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpublichospitalefficiencystudiesingulfregionandselectedcountriesinsimilarsettings
AT ahmedsayem systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpublichospitalefficiencystudiesingulfregionandselectedcountriesinsimilarsettings
AT niessenlouis systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpublichospitalefficiencystudiesingulfregionandselectedcountriesinsimilarsettings
AT khanjahangir systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpublichospitalefficiencystudiesingulfregionandselectedcountriesinsimilarsettings