Cargando…
Comparison of three different PCR protocols for the detection of ferlaviruses
BACKGROUND: Ferlaviruses are important pathogens in snakes often associated with respiratory and neurological disease. The detection of ferlaviral RNA by PCR is considered to be the most reliable method for the diagnosis of infection. The PCRs that have been used most commonly for this purpose have...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6685236/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31387580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-2028-0 |
_version_ | 1783442364370518016 |
---|---|
author | Kolesnik, Ekaterina Hyndman, Timothy H. Müller, Elisabeth Pees, Michael Marschang, Rachel E. |
author_facet | Kolesnik, Ekaterina Hyndman, Timothy H. Müller, Elisabeth Pees, Michael Marschang, Rachel E. |
author_sort | Kolesnik, Ekaterina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Ferlaviruses are important pathogens in snakes often associated with respiratory and neurological disease. The detection of ferlaviral RNA by PCR is considered to be the most reliable method for the diagnosis of infection. The PCRs that have been used most commonly for this purpose have not been properly assessed to determine their sensitivity, specificity and ability to detect the known genetic diversity of this group of viruses. The aim of this study was to compare three published PCR protocols so that a single method could be recommended to laboratories that perform this testing. RESULTS: Comparisons were carried out using cell culture isolates and tissues from snakes infected with specific virus genotypes. A single round PCR targeting a short segment of the viral polymerase (L) gene provided the highest sensitivity and specificity, and detected isolated ferlaviruses from all four described genogroups, as well as from tissues of infected snakes. CONCLUSION: A broadly-reactive PCR for the detection of all known ferlaviruses was found to provide a good combination of detection limit, specificity and speed. Based on these criteria, this method is recommended for the diagnosis of ferlavirus infections. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12917-019-2028-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6685236 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66852362019-08-12 Comparison of three different PCR protocols for the detection of ferlaviruses Kolesnik, Ekaterina Hyndman, Timothy H. Müller, Elisabeth Pees, Michael Marschang, Rachel E. BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Ferlaviruses are important pathogens in snakes often associated with respiratory and neurological disease. The detection of ferlaviral RNA by PCR is considered to be the most reliable method for the diagnosis of infection. The PCRs that have been used most commonly for this purpose have not been properly assessed to determine their sensitivity, specificity and ability to detect the known genetic diversity of this group of viruses. The aim of this study was to compare three published PCR protocols so that a single method could be recommended to laboratories that perform this testing. RESULTS: Comparisons were carried out using cell culture isolates and tissues from snakes infected with specific virus genotypes. A single round PCR targeting a short segment of the viral polymerase (L) gene provided the highest sensitivity and specificity, and detected isolated ferlaviruses from all four described genogroups, as well as from tissues of infected snakes. CONCLUSION: A broadly-reactive PCR for the detection of all known ferlaviruses was found to provide a good combination of detection limit, specificity and speed. Based on these criteria, this method is recommended for the diagnosis of ferlavirus infections. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12917-019-2028-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6685236/ /pubmed/31387580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-2028-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kolesnik, Ekaterina Hyndman, Timothy H. Müller, Elisabeth Pees, Michael Marschang, Rachel E. Comparison of three different PCR protocols for the detection of ferlaviruses |
title | Comparison of three different PCR protocols for the detection of ferlaviruses |
title_full | Comparison of three different PCR protocols for the detection of ferlaviruses |
title_fullStr | Comparison of three different PCR protocols for the detection of ferlaviruses |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of three different PCR protocols for the detection of ferlaviruses |
title_short | Comparison of three different PCR protocols for the detection of ferlaviruses |
title_sort | comparison of three different pcr protocols for the detection of ferlaviruses |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6685236/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31387580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-2028-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kolesnikekaterina comparisonofthreedifferentpcrprotocolsforthedetectionofferlaviruses AT hyndmantimothyh comparisonofthreedifferentpcrprotocolsforthedetectionofferlaviruses AT mullerelisabeth comparisonofthreedifferentpcrprotocolsforthedetectionofferlaviruses AT peesmichael comparisonofthreedifferentpcrprotocolsforthedetectionofferlaviruses AT marschangrachele comparisonofthreedifferentpcrprotocolsforthedetectionofferlaviruses |