Cargando…

Comparison of three different PCR protocols for the detection of ferlaviruses

BACKGROUND: Ferlaviruses are important pathogens in snakes often associated with respiratory and neurological disease. The detection of ferlaviral RNA by PCR is considered to be the most reliable method for the diagnosis of infection. The PCRs that have been used most commonly for this purpose have...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kolesnik, Ekaterina, Hyndman, Timothy H., Müller, Elisabeth, Pees, Michael, Marschang, Rachel E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6685236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31387580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-2028-0
_version_ 1783442364370518016
author Kolesnik, Ekaterina
Hyndman, Timothy H.
Müller, Elisabeth
Pees, Michael
Marschang, Rachel E.
author_facet Kolesnik, Ekaterina
Hyndman, Timothy H.
Müller, Elisabeth
Pees, Michael
Marschang, Rachel E.
author_sort Kolesnik, Ekaterina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ferlaviruses are important pathogens in snakes often associated with respiratory and neurological disease. The detection of ferlaviral RNA by PCR is considered to be the most reliable method for the diagnosis of infection. The PCRs that have been used most commonly for this purpose have not been properly assessed to determine their sensitivity, specificity and ability to detect the known genetic diversity of this group of viruses. The aim of this study was to compare three published PCR protocols so that a single method could be recommended to laboratories that perform this testing. RESULTS: Comparisons were carried out using cell culture isolates and tissues from snakes infected with specific virus genotypes. A single round PCR targeting a short segment of the viral polymerase (L) gene provided the highest sensitivity and specificity, and detected isolated ferlaviruses from all four described genogroups, as well as from tissues of infected snakes. CONCLUSION: A broadly-reactive PCR for the detection of all known ferlaviruses was found to provide a good combination of detection limit, specificity and speed. Based on these criteria, this method is recommended for the diagnosis of ferlavirus infections. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12917-019-2028-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6685236
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66852362019-08-12 Comparison of three different PCR protocols for the detection of ferlaviruses Kolesnik, Ekaterina Hyndman, Timothy H. Müller, Elisabeth Pees, Michael Marschang, Rachel E. BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Ferlaviruses are important pathogens in snakes often associated with respiratory and neurological disease. The detection of ferlaviral RNA by PCR is considered to be the most reliable method for the diagnosis of infection. The PCRs that have been used most commonly for this purpose have not been properly assessed to determine their sensitivity, specificity and ability to detect the known genetic diversity of this group of viruses. The aim of this study was to compare three published PCR protocols so that a single method could be recommended to laboratories that perform this testing. RESULTS: Comparisons were carried out using cell culture isolates and tissues from snakes infected with specific virus genotypes. A single round PCR targeting a short segment of the viral polymerase (L) gene provided the highest sensitivity and specificity, and detected isolated ferlaviruses from all four described genogroups, as well as from tissues of infected snakes. CONCLUSION: A broadly-reactive PCR for the detection of all known ferlaviruses was found to provide a good combination of detection limit, specificity and speed. Based on these criteria, this method is recommended for the diagnosis of ferlavirus infections. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12917-019-2028-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6685236/ /pubmed/31387580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-2028-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kolesnik, Ekaterina
Hyndman, Timothy H.
Müller, Elisabeth
Pees, Michael
Marschang, Rachel E.
Comparison of three different PCR protocols for the detection of ferlaviruses
title Comparison of three different PCR protocols for the detection of ferlaviruses
title_full Comparison of three different PCR protocols for the detection of ferlaviruses
title_fullStr Comparison of three different PCR protocols for the detection of ferlaviruses
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of three different PCR protocols for the detection of ferlaviruses
title_short Comparison of three different PCR protocols for the detection of ferlaviruses
title_sort comparison of three different pcr protocols for the detection of ferlaviruses
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6685236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31387580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-2028-0
work_keys_str_mv AT kolesnikekaterina comparisonofthreedifferentpcrprotocolsforthedetectionofferlaviruses
AT hyndmantimothyh comparisonofthreedifferentpcrprotocolsforthedetectionofferlaviruses
AT mullerelisabeth comparisonofthreedifferentpcrprotocolsforthedetectionofferlaviruses
AT peesmichael comparisonofthreedifferentpcrprotocolsforthedetectionofferlaviruses
AT marschangrachele comparisonofthreedifferentpcrprotocolsforthedetectionofferlaviruses