Cargando…

Microcomputed tomography a noninvasive method to evaluate the fit of a restoration as compared to conventional replica technique

AIM: The aim of the study was to compare the assessment methods used to evaluate the fit of Ni-Cr metal copings. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Comparative- Invitro study design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A stainless steel die simulating a prepared first maxillary premolar was used as a master die. Wax pattern c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ram, Sabita M., Ranadive, Nishita Narendra, Nadgere, Jyoti B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6685334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31462862
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_71_19
_version_ 1783442384040755200
author Ram, Sabita M.
Ranadive, Nishita Narendra
Nadgere, Jyoti B.
author_facet Ram, Sabita M.
Ranadive, Nishita Narendra
Nadgere, Jyoti B.
author_sort Ram, Sabita M.
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of the study was to compare the assessment methods used to evaluate the fit of Ni-Cr metal copings. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Comparative- Invitro study design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A stainless steel die simulating a prepared first maxillary premolar was used as a master die. Wax pattern copings were fabricated by the conventional dipping wax technique (n = 20) on the master die and were cast in Ni-Cr alloy. The finished copings were fitted on the master die and scanned by the micro-computed tomography (CT) scanner. Multiple projections of the sample were reconstructed to evaluate the marginal and internal fit at 5 predetermined locations. The same copings were used for the replica technique and were evaluated under a stereomicroscope in the same locations. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Shapiro–Wilk's test and Unpaired t-test RESULTS: The marginal fit values observed were 127.71 and 95.06 μm, chamfer area fit values were 151.97 and 132.7 μm, axial area fit values were 62.36 and 46.14 μm, axio-occlusal area fit values were 139.52 and 123.6 μm, occlusal area fit values were slightly higher with 217.91 and 193.1 μm, respectively, in replica and micro-CT technique. There was no statistically significant difference observed in the fit between the two assessment methods (α > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference observed in the marginal and internal fit of Ni-Cr metal copings with the two methods of assessment. However, the micro-CT technique proved to be simpler, noninvasive, and time-saving assessment method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6685334
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66853342020-07-01 Microcomputed tomography a noninvasive method to evaluate the fit of a restoration as compared to conventional replica technique Ram, Sabita M. Ranadive, Nishita Narendra Nadgere, Jyoti B. J Indian Prosthodont Soc Original Article AIM: The aim of the study was to compare the assessment methods used to evaluate the fit of Ni-Cr metal copings. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Comparative- Invitro study design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A stainless steel die simulating a prepared first maxillary premolar was used as a master die. Wax pattern copings were fabricated by the conventional dipping wax technique (n = 20) on the master die and were cast in Ni-Cr alloy. The finished copings were fitted on the master die and scanned by the micro-computed tomography (CT) scanner. Multiple projections of the sample were reconstructed to evaluate the marginal and internal fit at 5 predetermined locations. The same copings were used for the replica technique and were evaluated under a stereomicroscope in the same locations. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Shapiro–Wilk's test and Unpaired t-test RESULTS: The marginal fit values observed were 127.71 and 95.06 μm, chamfer area fit values were 151.97 and 132.7 μm, axial area fit values were 62.36 and 46.14 μm, axio-occlusal area fit values were 139.52 and 123.6 μm, occlusal area fit values were slightly higher with 217.91 and 193.1 μm, respectively, in replica and micro-CT technique. There was no statistically significant difference observed in the fit between the two assessment methods (α > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference observed in the marginal and internal fit of Ni-Cr metal copings with the two methods of assessment. However, the micro-CT technique proved to be simpler, noninvasive, and time-saving assessment method. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6685334/ /pubmed/31462862 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_71_19 Text en Copyright: © 2019 The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ram, Sabita M.
Ranadive, Nishita Narendra
Nadgere, Jyoti B.
Microcomputed tomography a noninvasive method to evaluate the fit of a restoration as compared to conventional replica technique
title Microcomputed tomography a noninvasive method to evaluate the fit of a restoration as compared to conventional replica technique
title_full Microcomputed tomography a noninvasive method to evaluate the fit of a restoration as compared to conventional replica technique
title_fullStr Microcomputed tomography a noninvasive method to evaluate the fit of a restoration as compared to conventional replica technique
title_full_unstemmed Microcomputed tomography a noninvasive method to evaluate the fit of a restoration as compared to conventional replica technique
title_short Microcomputed tomography a noninvasive method to evaluate the fit of a restoration as compared to conventional replica technique
title_sort microcomputed tomography a noninvasive method to evaluate the fit of a restoration as compared to conventional replica technique
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6685334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31462862
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_71_19
work_keys_str_mv AT ramsabitam microcomputedtomographyanoninvasivemethodtoevaluatethefitofarestorationascomparedtoconventionalreplicatechnique
AT ranadivenishitanarendra microcomputedtomographyanoninvasivemethodtoevaluatethefitofarestorationascomparedtoconventionalreplicatechnique
AT nadgerejyotib microcomputedtomographyanoninvasivemethodtoevaluatethefitofarestorationascomparedtoconventionalreplicatechnique