Cargando…

Measuring Cognitive Reserve (CR) – A systematic review of measurement properties of CR questionnaires for the adult population

AIM: The aim of this systematic review was to summarize and critically appraise the quality of published literature on measurement properties of questionnaires assessing Cognitive Reserve (CR) in adults (>18 years). METHODS: We systematically searched for published studies on MEDLINE, PsycINFO, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kartschmit, Nadja, Mikolajczyk, Rafael, Schubert, Torsten, Lacruz, Maria Elena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6685632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31390344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219851
_version_ 1783442431586336768
author Kartschmit, Nadja
Mikolajczyk, Rafael
Schubert, Torsten
Lacruz, Maria Elena
author_facet Kartschmit, Nadja
Mikolajczyk, Rafael
Schubert, Torsten
Lacruz, Maria Elena
author_sort Kartschmit, Nadja
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of this systematic review was to summarize and critically appraise the quality of published literature on measurement properties of questionnaires assessing Cognitive Reserve (CR) in adults (>18 years). METHODS: We systematically searched for published studies on MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science through August 2018. We evaluated the methodological quality of the included studies and the results on measurement properties based on a consensus-based standard checklist. RESULTS: The search strategy identified 991 publications, of which 37 were selected evaluating the measurement properties of six different questionnaires. Construct validity of the Cognitive Reserve Index questionnaire was most extensively evaluated, while evaluation of the remaining measurement properties of this questionnaire was scarce. Measurement properties of the Cognitive Reserve Questionnaire and the Cognitive Reserve Scale were assessed more completely. While the Lifetime of Experience Questionnaire seems to be the most thorough instrument, a finale recommendation for one specific questionnaire cannot be drawn, since about half of the measurement properties for each questionnaire were poorly or not assessed at all. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need of high quality methodological studies assessing measurement properties of CR questionnaires, especially regarding content validity, structural validity, and responsiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO Registration number CRD42018107766.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6685632
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66856322019-08-15 Measuring Cognitive Reserve (CR) – A systematic review of measurement properties of CR questionnaires for the adult population Kartschmit, Nadja Mikolajczyk, Rafael Schubert, Torsten Lacruz, Maria Elena PLoS One Research Article AIM: The aim of this systematic review was to summarize and critically appraise the quality of published literature on measurement properties of questionnaires assessing Cognitive Reserve (CR) in adults (>18 years). METHODS: We systematically searched for published studies on MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science through August 2018. We evaluated the methodological quality of the included studies and the results on measurement properties based on a consensus-based standard checklist. RESULTS: The search strategy identified 991 publications, of which 37 were selected evaluating the measurement properties of six different questionnaires. Construct validity of the Cognitive Reserve Index questionnaire was most extensively evaluated, while evaluation of the remaining measurement properties of this questionnaire was scarce. Measurement properties of the Cognitive Reserve Questionnaire and the Cognitive Reserve Scale were assessed more completely. While the Lifetime of Experience Questionnaire seems to be the most thorough instrument, a finale recommendation for one specific questionnaire cannot be drawn, since about half of the measurement properties for each questionnaire were poorly or not assessed at all. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need of high quality methodological studies assessing measurement properties of CR questionnaires, especially regarding content validity, structural validity, and responsiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO Registration number CRD42018107766. Public Library of Science 2019-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6685632/ /pubmed/31390344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219851 Text en © 2019 Kartschmit et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kartschmit, Nadja
Mikolajczyk, Rafael
Schubert, Torsten
Lacruz, Maria Elena
Measuring Cognitive Reserve (CR) – A systematic review of measurement properties of CR questionnaires for the adult population
title Measuring Cognitive Reserve (CR) – A systematic review of measurement properties of CR questionnaires for the adult population
title_full Measuring Cognitive Reserve (CR) – A systematic review of measurement properties of CR questionnaires for the adult population
title_fullStr Measuring Cognitive Reserve (CR) – A systematic review of measurement properties of CR questionnaires for the adult population
title_full_unstemmed Measuring Cognitive Reserve (CR) – A systematic review of measurement properties of CR questionnaires for the adult population
title_short Measuring Cognitive Reserve (CR) – A systematic review of measurement properties of CR questionnaires for the adult population
title_sort measuring cognitive reserve (cr) – a systematic review of measurement properties of cr questionnaires for the adult population
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6685632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31390344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219851
work_keys_str_mv AT kartschmitnadja measuringcognitivereservecrasystematicreviewofmeasurementpropertiesofcrquestionnairesfortheadultpopulation
AT mikolajczykrafael measuringcognitivereservecrasystematicreviewofmeasurementpropertiesofcrquestionnairesfortheadultpopulation
AT schuberttorsten measuringcognitivereservecrasystematicreviewofmeasurementpropertiesofcrquestionnairesfortheadultpopulation
AT lacruzmariaelena measuringcognitivereservecrasystematicreviewofmeasurementpropertiesofcrquestionnairesfortheadultpopulation