Cargando…
Measuring Cognitive Reserve (CR) – A systematic review of measurement properties of CR questionnaires for the adult population
AIM: The aim of this systematic review was to summarize and critically appraise the quality of published literature on measurement properties of questionnaires assessing Cognitive Reserve (CR) in adults (>18 years). METHODS: We systematically searched for published studies on MEDLINE, PsycINFO, a...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6685632/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31390344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219851 |
_version_ | 1783442431586336768 |
---|---|
author | Kartschmit, Nadja Mikolajczyk, Rafael Schubert, Torsten Lacruz, Maria Elena |
author_facet | Kartschmit, Nadja Mikolajczyk, Rafael Schubert, Torsten Lacruz, Maria Elena |
author_sort | Kartschmit, Nadja |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The aim of this systematic review was to summarize and critically appraise the quality of published literature on measurement properties of questionnaires assessing Cognitive Reserve (CR) in adults (>18 years). METHODS: We systematically searched for published studies on MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science through August 2018. We evaluated the methodological quality of the included studies and the results on measurement properties based on a consensus-based standard checklist. RESULTS: The search strategy identified 991 publications, of which 37 were selected evaluating the measurement properties of six different questionnaires. Construct validity of the Cognitive Reserve Index questionnaire was most extensively evaluated, while evaluation of the remaining measurement properties of this questionnaire was scarce. Measurement properties of the Cognitive Reserve Questionnaire and the Cognitive Reserve Scale were assessed more completely. While the Lifetime of Experience Questionnaire seems to be the most thorough instrument, a finale recommendation for one specific questionnaire cannot be drawn, since about half of the measurement properties for each questionnaire were poorly or not assessed at all. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need of high quality methodological studies assessing measurement properties of CR questionnaires, especially regarding content validity, structural validity, and responsiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO Registration number CRD42018107766. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6685632 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66856322019-08-15 Measuring Cognitive Reserve (CR) – A systematic review of measurement properties of CR questionnaires for the adult population Kartschmit, Nadja Mikolajczyk, Rafael Schubert, Torsten Lacruz, Maria Elena PLoS One Research Article AIM: The aim of this systematic review was to summarize and critically appraise the quality of published literature on measurement properties of questionnaires assessing Cognitive Reserve (CR) in adults (>18 years). METHODS: We systematically searched for published studies on MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science through August 2018. We evaluated the methodological quality of the included studies and the results on measurement properties based on a consensus-based standard checklist. RESULTS: The search strategy identified 991 publications, of which 37 were selected evaluating the measurement properties of six different questionnaires. Construct validity of the Cognitive Reserve Index questionnaire was most extensively evaluated, while evaluation of the remaining measurement properties of this questionnaire was scarce. Measurement properties of the Cognitive Reserve Questionnaire and the Cognitive Reserve Scale were assessed more completely. While the Lifetime of Experience Questionnaire seems to be the most thorough instrument, a finale recommendation for one specific questionnaire cannot be drawn, since about half of the measurement properties for each questionnaire were poorly or not assessed at all. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need of high quality methodological studies assessing measurement properties of CR questionnaires, especially regarding content validity, structural validity, and responsiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO Registration number CRD42018107766. Public Library of Science 2019-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6685632/ /pubmed/31390344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219851 Text en © 2019 Kartschmit et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kartschmit, Nadja Mikolajczyk, Rafael Schubert, Torsten Lacruz, Maria Elena Measuring Cognitive Reserve (CR) – A systematic review of measurement properties of CR questionnaires for the adult population |
title | Measuring Cognitive Reserve (CR) – A systematic review of measurement properties of CR questionnaires for the adult population |
title_full | Measuring Cognitive Reserve (CR) – A systematic review of measurement properties of CR questionnaires for the adult population |
title_fullStr | Measuring Cognitive Reserve (CR) – A systematic review of measurement properties of CR questionnaires for the adult population |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring Cognitive Reserve (CR) – A systematic review of measurement properties of CR questionnaires for the adult population |
title_short | Measuring Cognitive Reserve (CR) – A systematic review of measurement properties of CR questionnaires for the adult population |
title_sort | measuring cognitive reserve (cr) – a systematic review of measurement properties of cr questionnaires for the adult population |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6685632/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31390344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219851 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kartschmitnadja measuringcognitivereservecrasystematicreviewofmeasurementpropertiesofcrquestionnairesfortheadultpopulation AT mikolajczykrafael measuringcognitivereservecrasystematicreviewofmeasurementpropertiesofcrquestionnairesfortheadultpopulation AT schuberttorsten measuringcognitivereservecrasystematicreviewofmeasurementpropertiesofcrquestionnairesfortheadultpopulation AT lacruzmariaelena measuringcognitivereservecrasystematicreviewofmeasurementpropertiesofcrquestionnairesfortheadultpopulation |