Cargando…

How do we assess musicians’ musculoskeletal symptoms?: a review of outcomes and tools used

Recent reviews of musicians’ musculoskeletal symptoms (MSS) have reported heterogeneity in the outcomes reported and data collection tools used, making it difficult to compare and synthesise findings. The purpose of this present review was to improve the consistency of future research, by documentin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: STANHOPE, Jessica, PISANIELLO, Dino, TOOHER, Rebecca, WEINSTEIN, Philip
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Japan 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6685794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30555103
http://dx.doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2018-0065
_version_ 1783442452264255488
author STANHOPE, Jessica
PISANIELLO, Dino
TOOHER, Rebecca
WEINSTEIN, Philip
author_facet STANHOPE, Jessica
PISANIELLO, Dino
TOOHER, Rebecca
WEINSTEIN, Philip
author_sort STANHOPE, Jessica
collection PubMed
description Recent reviews of musicians’ musculoskeletal symptoms (MSS) have reported heterogeneity in the outcomes reported and data collection tools used, making it difficult to compare and synthesise findings. The purpose of this present review was to improve the consistency of future research, by documenting the outcomes reported in recent studies of musicians’ MSS and the data collection tools used. All English language, peer-reviewed studies, published 2007–2016 that reported musicians’ self-reported MSS outcomes were identified. Details of the types of outcomes reported and the tools used were extracted, and synthesised descriptively. A range of MSS outcomes were reported, including MSS with a temporal relationship to activities performed, and the consequences of symptoms. Only 24% of studies used standardised questionnaires, with the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ) being the most commonly used. To improve the homogeneity of outcomes and data collection tools when investigating musicians’ MSS, we recommend using the NMQ, where appropriate. Recall periods of 12-months and 7-d are the most appropriate for prevalence, and 7-d recall periods for ratings. Importantly, outcomes and the tools used to collect data should be reported in sufficient detail to ensure that the study can be replicated, critiqued, and accurately interpreted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6685794
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Japan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66857942019-08-09 How do we assess musicians’ musculoskeletal symptoms?: a review of outcomes and tools used STANHOPE, Jessica PISANIELLO, Dino TOOHER, Rebecca WEINSTEIN, Philip Ind Health Review Article Recent reviews of musicians’ musculoskeletal symptoms (MSS) have reported heterogeneity in the outcomes reported and data collection tools used, making it difficult to compare and synthesise findings. The purpose of this present review was to improve the consistency of future research, by documenting the outcomes reported in recent studies of musicians’ MSS and the data collection tools used. All English language, peer-reviewed studies, published 2007–2016 that reported musicians’ self-reported MSS outcomes were identified. Details of the types of outcomes reported and the tools used were extracted, and synthesised descriptively. A range of MSS outcomes were reported, including MSS with a temporal relationship to activities performed, and the consequences of symptoms. Only 24% of studies used standardised questionnaires, with the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ) being the most commonly used. To improve the homogeneity of outcomes and data collection tools when investigating musicians’ MSS, we recommend using the NMQ, where appropriate. Recall periods of 12-months and 7-d are the most appropriate for prevalence, and 7-d recall periods for ratings. Importantly, outcomes and the tools used to collect data should be reported in sufficient detail to ensure that the study can be replicated, critiqued, and accurately interpreted. National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Japan 2018-12-14 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6685794/ /pubmed/30555103 http://dx.doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2018-0065 Text en ©2019 National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Review Article
STANHOPE, Jessica
PISANIELLO, Dino
TOOHER, Rebecca
WEINSTEIN, Philip
How do we assess musicians’ musculoskeletal symptoms?: a review of outcomes and tools used
title How do we assess musicians’ musculoskeletal symptoms?: a review of outcomes and tools used
title_full How do we assess musicians’ musculoskeletal symptoms?: a review of outcomes and tools used
title_fullStr How do we assess musicians’ musculoskeletal symptoms?: a review of outcomes and tools used
title_full_unstemmed How do we assess musicians’ musculoskeletal symptoms?: a review of outcomes and tools used
title_short How do we assess musicians’ musculoskeletal symptoms?: a review of outcomes and tools used
title_sort how do we assess musicians’ musculoskeletal symptoms?: a review of outcomes and tools used
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6685794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30555103
http://dx.doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2018-0065
work_keys_str_mv AT stanhopejessica howdoweassessmusiciansmusculoskeletalsymptomsareviewofoutcomesandtoolsused
AT pisaniellodino howdoweassessmusiciansmusculoskeletalsymptomsareviewofoutcomesandtoolsused
AT tooherrebecca howdoweassessmusiciansmusculoskeletalsymptomsareviewofoutcomesandtoolsused
AT weinsteinphilip howdoweassessmusiciansmusculoskeletalsymptomsareviewofoutcomesandtoolsused