Cargando…

Comparability of dental implant site ridge measurements using ultra-low-dose multidetector row computed tomography combined with filtered back-projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and model-based iterative reconstruction

OBJECTIVE: To assess the linear measurements of edentulous ridges recorded from multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) images obtained by a previously untested ultra-low dose in combination with filtered back-projection (FBP), adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR), and model-bas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al-Ekrish, Asma’a Abdurrahman, Al-Shawaf, Reema, Alfaleh, Wafa, Hörmann, Romed, Puelacher, Wolfgang, Widmann, Gerlig
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Singapore 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6685921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30484207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11282-018-0350-z
_version_ 1783442458704609280
author Al-Ekrish, Asma’a Abdurrahman
Al-Shawaf, Reema
Alfaleh, Wafa
Hörmann, Romed
Puelacher, Wolfgang
Widmann, Gerlig
author_facet Al-Ekrish, Asma’a Abdurrahman
Al-Shawaf, Reema
Alfaleh, Wafa
Hörmann, Romed
Puelacher, Wolfgang
Widmann, Gerlig
author_sort Al-Ekrish, Asma’a Abdurrahman
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the linear measurements of edentulous ridges recorded from multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) images obtained by a previously untested ultra-low dose in combination with filtered back-projection (FBP), adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR), and model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR). METHODS: Three cadavers were imaged using a reference protocol with a standard dose and FBP (volume CT dose index (CTDIvol): 29.4 mGy) and two ultra-low-dose protocols, LD1 and LD2 (CTDIvol: 0.53 and 0.29 mGy). All test examinations were reconstructed with FBP, ASIR 50, ASIR 100, and MBIR. Linear measurements from the images of the edentulous ridges recorded from the test protocols were compared with those from the reference using a one-sample t test, Bland–Altman plots, and linear regression. Statistical significance was set at a p value of 0.05. RESULTS: The one-sample t test demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the measurements from the reference protocol and all test protocols. The difference was not clinically significant for the following three test protocols: LD1/FBP, LD1/ASIR 50, and LD2/FBP. Bland–Altman plots with linear regression showed no systematic variation between the measurements obtained with the reference protocol and these three test protocols. CONCLUSIONS: The lowest-dose protocol to demonstrate comparable measurements with a standard MDCT dose was CTDIvol 0.29 mGy with FBP. These results must be considered with caution for areas of the jaws with thin cortication. The results in areas of thin cortication should be verified by studies with larger sample sizes at such areas and comparison with true gold standard measurements. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11282-018-0350-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6685921
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66859212019-08-23 Comparability of dental implant site ridge measurements using ultra-low-dose multidetector row computed tomography combined with filtered back-projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and model-based iterative reconstruction Al-Ekrish, Asma’a Abdurrahman Al-Shawaf, Reema Alfaleh, Wafa Hörmann, Romed Puelacher, Wolfgang Widmann, Gerlig Oral Radiol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To assess the linear measurements of edentulous ridges recorded from multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) images obtained by a previously untested ultra-low dose in combination with filtered back-projection (FBP), adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR), and model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR). METHODS: Three cadavers were imaged using a reference protocol with a standard dose and FBP (volume CT dose index (CTDIvol): 29.4 mGy) and two ultra-low-dose protocols, LD1 and LD2 (CTDIvol: 0.53 and 0.29 mGy). All test examinations were reconstructed with FBP, ASIR 50, ASIR 100, and MBIR. Linear measurements from the images of the edentulous ridges recorded from the test protocols were compared with those from the reference using a one-sample t test, Bland–Altman plots, and linear regression. Statistical significance was set at a p value of 0.05. RESULTS: The one-sample t test demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the measurements from the reference protocol and all test protocols. The difference was not clinically significant for the following three test protocols: LD1/FBP, LD1/ASIR 50, and LD2/FBP. Bland–Altman plots with linear regression showed no systematic variation between the measurements obtained with the reference protocol and these three test protocols. CONCLUSIONS: The lowest-dose protocol to demonstrate comparable measurements with a standard MDCT dose was CTDIvol 0.29 mGy with FBP. These results must be considered with caution for areas of the jaws with thin cortication. The results in areas of thin cortication should be verified by studies with larger sample sizes at such areas and comparison with true gold standard measurements. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11282-018-0350-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Singapore 2018-10-13 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6685921/ /pubmed/30484207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11282-018-0350-z Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Al-Ekrish, Asma’a Abdurrahman
Al-Shawaf, Reema
Alfaleh, Wafa
Hörmann, Romed
Puelacher, Wolfgang
Widmann, Gerlig
Comparability of dental implant site ridge measurements using ultra-low-dose multidetector row computed tomography combined with filtered back-projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and model-based iterative reconstruction
title Comparability of dental implant site ridge measurements using ultra-low-dose multidetector row computed tomography combined with filtered back-projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and model-based iterative reconstruction
title_full Comparability of dental implant site ridge measurements using ultra-low-dose multidetector row computed tomography combined with filtered back-projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and model-based iterative reconstruction
title_fullStr Comparability of dental implant site ridge measurements using ultra-low-dose multidetector row computed tomography combined with filtered back-projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and model-based iterative reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Comparability of dental implant site ridge measurements using ultra-low-dose multidetector row computed tomography combined with filtered back-projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and model-based iterative reconstruction
title_short Comparability of dental implant site ridge measurements using ultra-low-dose multidetector row computed tomography combined with filtered back-projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and model-based iterative reconstruction
title_sort comparability of dental implant site ridge measurements using ultra-low-dose multidetector row computed tomography combined with filtered back-projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and model-based iterative reconstruction
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6685921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30484207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11282-018-0350-z
work_keys_str_mv AT alekrishasmaaabdurrahman comparabilityofdentalimplantsiteridgemeasurementsusingultralowdosemultidetectorrowcomputedtomographycombinedwithfilteredbackprojectionadaptivestatisticaliterativereconstructionandmodelbasediterativereconstruction
AT alshawafreema comparabilityofdentalimplantsiteridgemeasurementsusingultralowdosemultidetectorrowcomputedtomographycombinedwithfilteredbackprojectionadaptivestatisticaliterativereconstructionandmodelbasediterativereconstruction
AT alfalehwafa comparabilityofdentalimplantsiteridgemeasurementsusingultralowdosemultidetectorrowcomputedtomographycombinedwithfilteredbackprojectionadaptivestatisticaliterativereconstructionandmodelbasediterativereconstruction
AT hormannromed comparabilityofdentalimplantsiteridgemeasurementsusingultralowdosemultidetectorrowcomputedtomographycombinedwithfilteredbackprojectionadaptivestatisticaliterativereconstructionandmodelbasediterativereconstruction
AT puelacherwolfgang comparabilityofdentalimplantsiteridgemeasurementsusingultralowdosemultidetectorrowcomputedtomographycombinedwithfilteredbackprojectionadaptivestatisticaliterativereconstructionandmodelbasediterativereconstruction
AT widmanngerlig comparabilityofdentalimplantsiteridgemeasurementsusingultralowdosemultidetectorrowcomputedtomographycombinedwithfilteredbackprojectionadaptivestatisticaliterativereconstructionandmodelbasediterativereconstruction