Cargando…

Assessing cellular energy dysfunction in CFS/ME using a commercially available laboratory test

The mitochondrial energy score (MES) protocol, developed by the Myhill group, is marketed as a diagnostic test for chronic fatigue syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME). This study assessed the reliability and reproducibility of the test, currently provided by private clinics, to assess its po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tomas, Cara, Lodge, Tiffany A., Potter, Michelle, Elson, Joanna L., Newton, Julia L., Morten, Karl J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6686017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31391529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47966-z
_version_ 1783442481075978240
author Tomas, Cara
Lodge, Tiffany A.
Potter, Michelle
Elson, Joanna L.
Newton, Julia L.
Morten, Karl J.
author_facet Tomas, Cara
Lodge, Tiffany A.
Potter, Michelle
Elson, Joanna L.
Newton, Julia L.
Morten, Karl J.
author_sort Tomas, Cara
collection PubMed
description The mitochondrial energy score (MES) protocol, developed by the Myhill group, is marketed as a diagnostic test for chronic fatigue syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME). This study assessed the reliability and reproducibility of the test, currently provided by private clinics, to assess its potential to be developed as an NHS accredited laboratory test. We replicated the MES protocol using neutrophils and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from CFS/ME patients (10) and healthy controls (13). The protocol was then repeated in PBMCs and neutrophils from healthy controls to investigate the effect of delayed sample processing time used by the Myhill group. Experiments using the established protocol showed no differences between CFS/ME patients and healthy controls in any of the components of the MES (p ≥ 0.059). Delaying blood sample processing by 24 hours (well within the 72 hour time frame quoted by the Myhill group) significantly altered many of the parameters used to calculate the MES in both neutrophils and PBMCs. The MES test does not have the reliability and reproducibility required of a diagnostic test and therefore should not currently be offered as a diagnostic test for CFS/ME. The differences observed by the Myhill group may be down to differences in sample processing time between cohorts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6686017
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66860172019-08-12 Assessing cellular energy dysfunction in CFS/ME using a commercially available laboratory test Tomas, Cara Lodge, Tiffany A. Potter, Michelle Elson, Joanna L. Newton, Julia L. Morten, Karl J. Sci Rep Article The mitochondrial energy score (MES) protocol, developed by the Myhill group, is marketed as a diagnostic test for chronic fatigue syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME). This study assessed the reliability and reproducibility of the test, currently provided by private clinics, to assess its potential to be developed as an NHS accredited laboratory test. We replicated the MES protocol using neutrophils and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from CFS/ME patients (10) and healthy controls (13). The protocol was then repeated in PBMCs and neutrophils from healthy controls to investigate the effect of delayed sample processing time used by the Myhill group. Experiments using the established protocol showed no differences between CFS/ME patients and healthy controls in any of the components of the MES (p ≥ 0.059). Delaying blood sample processing by 24 hours (well within the 72 hour time frame quoted by the Myhill group) significantly altered many of the parameters used to calculate the MES in both neutrophils and PBMCs. The MES test does not have the reliability and reproducibility required of a diagnostic test and therefore should not currently be offered as a diagnostic test for CFS/ME. The differences observed by the Myhill group may be down to differences in sample processing time between cohorts. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6686017/ /pubmed/31391529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47966-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Tomas, Cara
Lodge, Tiffany A.
Potter, Michelle
Elson, Joanna L.
Newton, Julia L.
Morten, Karl J.
Assessing cellular energy dysfunction in CFS/ME using a commercially available laboratory test
title Assessing cellular energy dysfunction in CFS/ME using a commercially available laboratory test
title_full Assessing cellular energy dysfunction in CFS/ME using a commercially available laboratory test
title_fullStr Assessing cellular energy dysfunction in CFS/ME using a commercially available laboratory test
title_full_unstemmed Assessing cellular energy dysfunction in CFS/ME using a commercially available laboratory test
title_short Assessing cellular energy dysfunction in CFS/ME using a commercially available laboratory test
title_sort assessing cellular energy dysfunction in cfs/me using a commercially available laboratory test
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6686017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31391529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47966-z
work_keys_str_mv AT tomascara assessingcellularenergydysfunctionincfsmeusingacommerciallyavailablelaboratorytest
AT lodgetiffanya assessingcellularenergydysfunctionincfsmeusingacommerciallyavailablelaboratorytest
AT pottermichelle assessingcellularenergydysfunctionincfsmeusingacommerciallyavailablelaboratorytest
AT elsonjoannal assessingcellularenergydysfunctionincfsmeusingacommerciallyavailablelaboratorytest
AT newtonjulial assessingcellularenergydysfunctionincfsmeusingacommerciallyavailablelaboratorytest
AT mortenkarlj assessingcellularenergydysfunctionincfsmeusingacommerciallyavailablelaboratorytest