Cargando…
Assessing cellular energy dysfunction in CFS/ME using a commercially available laboratory test
The mitochondrial energy score (MES) protocol, developed by the Myhill group, is marketed as a diagnostic test for chronic fatigue syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME). This study assessed the reliability and reproducibility of the test, currently provided by private clinics, to assess its po...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6686017/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31391529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47966-z |
_version_ | 1783442481075978240 |
---|---|
author | Tomas, Cara Lodge, Tiffany A. Potter, Michelle Elson, Joanna L. Newton, Julia L. Morten, Karl J. |
author_facet | Tomas, Cara Lodge, Tiffany A. Potter, Michelle Elson, Joanna L. Newton, Julia L. Morten, Karl J. |
author_sort | Tomas, Cara |
collection | PubMed |
description | The mitochondrial energy score (MES) protocol, developed by the Myhill group, is marketed as a diagnostic test for chronic fatigue syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME). This study assessed the reliability and reproducibility of the test, currently provided by private clinics, to assess its potential to be developed as an NHS accredited laboratory test. We replicated the MES protocol using neutrophils and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from CFS/ME patients (10) and healthy controls (13). The protocol was then repeated in PBMCs and neutrophils from healthy controls to investigate the effect of delayed sample processing time used by the Myhill group. Experiments using the established protocol showed no differences between CFS/ME patients and healthy controls in any of the components of the MES (p ≥ 0.059). Delaying blood sample processing by 24 hours (well within the 72 hour time frame quoted by the Myhill group) significantly altered many of the parameters used to calculate the MES in both neutrophils and PBMCs. The MES test does not have the reliability and reproducibility required of a diagnostic test and therefore should not currently be offered as a diagnostic test for CFS/ME. The differences observed by the Myhill group may be down to differences in sample processing time between cohorts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6686017 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66860172019-08-12 Assessing cellular energy dysfunction in CFS/ME using a commercially available laboratory test Tomas, Cara Lodge, Tiffany A. Potter, Michelle Elson, Joanna L. Newton, Julia L. Morten, Karl J. Sci Rep Article The mitochondrial energy score (MES) protocol, developed by the Myhill group, is marketed as a diagnostic test for chronic fatigue syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME). This study assessed the reliability and reproducibility of the test, currently provided by private clinics, to assess its potential to be developed as an NHS accredited laboratory test. We replicated the MES protocol using neutrophils and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from CFS/ME patients (10) and healthy controls (13). The protocol was then repeated in PBMCs and neutrophils from healthy controls to investigate the effect of delayed sample processing time used by the Myhill group. Experiments using the established protocol showed no differences between CFS/ME patients and healthy controls in any of the components of the MES (p ≥ 0.059). Delaying blood sample processing by 24 hours (well within the 72 hour time frame quoted by the Myhill group) significantly altered many of the parameters used to calculate the MES in both neutrophils and PBMCs. The MES test does not have the reliability and reproducibility required of a diagnostic test and therefore should not currently be offered as a diagnostic test for CFS/ME. The differences observed by the Myhill group may be down to differences in sample processing time between cohorts. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6686017/ /pubmed/31391529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47966-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Tomas, Cara Lodge, Tiffany A. Potter, Michelle Elson, Joanna L. Newton, Julia L. Morten, Karl J. Assessing cellular energy dysfunction in CFS/ME using a commercially available laboratory test |
title | Assessing cellular energy dysfunction in CFS/ME using a commercially available laboratory test |
title_full | Assessing cellular energy dysfunction in CFS/ME using a commercially available laboratory test |
title_fullStr | Assessing cellular energy dysfunction in CFS/ME using a commercially available laboratory test |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing cellular energy dysfunction in CFS/ME using a commercially available laboratory test |
title_short | Assessing cellular energy dysfunction in CFS/ME using a commercially available laboratory test |
title_sort | assessing cellular energy dysfunction in cfs/me using a commercially available laboratory test |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6686017/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31391529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47966-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tomascara assessingcellularenergydysfunctionincfsmeusingacommerciallyavailablelaboratorytest AT lodgetiffanya assessingcellularenergydysfunctionincfsmeusingacommerciallyavailablelaboratorytest AT pottermichelle assessingcellularenergydysfunctionincfsmeusingacommerciallyavailablelaboratorytest AT elsonjoannal assessingcellularenergydysfunctionincfsmeusingacommerciallyavailablelaboratorytest AT newtonjulial assessingcellularenergydysfunctionincfsmeusingacommerciallyavailablelaboratorytest AT mortenkarlj assessingcellularenergydysfunctionincfsmeusingacommerciallyavailablelaboratorytest |