Cargando…

A comparative assessment of dilution correction methods for spot urinary analyte concentrations in a UK population exposed to arsenic in drinking water

Spot urinary concentrations of environmental exposure biomarkers require correction for dilution. There is no consensus on the most appropriate method, with creatinine used by default despite lacking theoretical robustness. We comparatively assessed the efficacy of creatinine; specific gravity (SG);...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Middleton, Daniel R.S., Watts, Michael J., Polya, David A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6686075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31207477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.03.069
_version_ 1783442490600194048
author Middleton, Daniel R.S.
Watts, Michael J.
Polya, David A.
author_facet Middleton, Daniel R.S.
Watts, Michael J.
Polya, David A.
author_sort Middleton, Daniel R.S.
collection PubMed
description Spot urinary concentrations of environmental exposure biomarkers require correction for dilution. There is no consensus on the most appropriate method, with creatinine used by default despite lacking theoretical robustness. We comparatively assessed the efficacy of creatinine; specific gravity (SG); osmolality and modifications of all three for dilution correcting urinary arsenic. For 202 participants with urinary arsenic, creatinine, osmolality and SG measurements paired to drinking water As, we compared the performance corrections against two independent criteria: primarily, (A) correlations of corrected urinary As and the dilution measurements used to correct them - weak correlations indicating good performance and (B) correlations of corrected urinary As and drinking water As - strong correlations indicating good performance. More than a third of variation in spot urinary As concentrations was attributable to dilution. Conventional SG and osmolality correction removed significant dilution variation from As concentrations, whereas conventional creatinine over-corrected, and modifications of all three removed measurable dilution variation. Modified creatinine and both methods of SG and osmolality generated stronger correlations of urinary and drinking water As concentrations than conventional creatinine, which gave weaker correlations than uncorrected values. A disparity in optima between performance criteria was observed, with much smaller improvements possible for Criterion B relative to A. Conventional corrections – particularly creatinine - limit the utility spot urine samples, whereas a modified technique outlined here may allow substantial improvement and can be readily retrospectively applied to existing datasets. More studies are needed to optimize urinary dilution correction methods. Covariates of urinary dilution measurements still warrant consideration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6686075
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66860752019-09-01 A comparative assessment of dilution correction methods for spot urinary analyte concentrations in a UK population exposed to arsenic in drinking water Middleton, Daniel R.S. Watts, Michael J. Polya, David A. Environ Int Article Spot urinary concentrations of environmental exposure biomarkers require correction for dilution. There is no consensus on the most appropriate method, with creatinine used by default despite lacking theoretical robustness. We comparatively assessed the efficacy of creatinine; specific gravity (SG); osmolality and modifications of all three for dilution correcting urinary arsenic. For 202 participants with urinary arsenic, creatinine, osmolality and SG measurements paired to drinking water As, we compared the performance corrections against two independent criteria: primarily, (A) correlations of corrected urinary As and the dilution measurements used to correct them - weak correlations indicating good performance and (B) correlations of corrected urinary As and drinking water As - strong correlations indicating good performance. More than a third of variation in spot urinary As concentrations was attributable to dilution. Conventional SG and osmolality correction removed significant dilution variation from As concentrations, whereas conventional creatinine over-corrected, and modifications of all three removed measurable dilution variation. Modified creatinine and both methods of SG and osmolality generated stronger correlations of urinary and drinking water As concentrations than conventional creatinine, which gave weaker correlations than uncorrected values. A disparity in optima between performance criteria was observed, with much smaller improvements possible for Criterion B relative to A. Conventional corrections – particularly creatinine - limit the utility spot urine samples, whereas a modified technique outlined here may allow substantial improvement and can be readily retrospectively applied to existing datasets. More studies are needed to optimize urinary dilution correction methods. Covariates of urinary dilution measurements still warrant consideration. Elsevier Science 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6686075/ /pubmed/31207477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.03.069 Text en © 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Middleton, Daniel R.S.
Watts, Michael J.
Polya, David A.
A comparative assessment of dilution correction methods for spot urinary analyte concentrations in a UK population exposed to arsenic in drinking water
title A comparative assessment of dilution correction methods for spot urinary analyte concentrations in a UK population exposed to arsenic in drinking water
title_full A comparative assessment of dilution correction methods for spot urinary analyte concentrations in a UK population exposed to arsenic in drinking water
title_fullStr A comparative assessment of dilution correction methods for spot urinary analyte concentrations in a UK population exposed to arsenic in drinking water
title_full_unstemmed A comparative assessment of dilution correction methods for spot urinary analyte concentrations in a UK population exposed to arsenic in drinking water
title_short A comparative assessment of dilution correction methods for spot urinary analyte concentrations in a UK population exposed to arsenic in drinking water
title_sort comparative assessment of dilution correction methods for spot urinary analyte concentrations in a uk population exposed to arsenic in drinking water
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6686075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31207477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.03.069
work_keys_str_mv AT middletondanielrs acomparativeassessmentofdilutioncorrectionmethodsforspoturinaryanalyteconcentrationsinaukpopulationexposedtoarsenicindrinkingwater
AT wattsmichaelj acomparativeassessmentofdilutioncorrectionmethodsforspoturinaryanalyteconcentrationsinaukpopulationexposedtoarsenicindrinkingwater
AT polyadavida acomparativeassessmentofdilutioncorrectionmethodsforspoturinaryanalyteconcentrationsinaukpopulationexposedtoarsenicindrinkingwater
AT middletondanielrs comparativeassessmentofdilutioncorrectionmethodsforspoturinaryanalyteconcentrationsinaukpopulationexposedtoarsenicindrinkingwater
AT wattsmichaelj comparativeassessmentofdilutioncorrectionmethodsforspoturinaryanalyteconcentrationsinaukpopulationexposedtoarsenicindrinkingwater
AT polyadavida comparativeassessmentofdilutioncorrectionmethodsforspoturinaryanalyteconcentrationsinaukpopulationexposedtoarsenicindrinkingwater