Cargando…
Endoscopic full-thickness resection of colorectal lesions with the full-thickness resection device: clinical experience from two referral centers in Greece
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) using the full-thickness resection device (FTRD(®)) is an invasive treatment for colorectal lesions not resectable by conventional endoscopic techniques. This study presents the first Greek experience of the FTRD(®) procedure, assessing the effi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6686092/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31474795 http://dx.doi.org/10.20524/aog.2019.0392 |
_version_ | 1783442494678106112 |
---|---|
author | Velegraki, Magdalini Trikola, Artemis Vasiliadis, Konstantinos Fragaki, Maria Mpitouli, Afroditi Dimas, Ioannis Voudoukis, Evangelos Giannikaki, Elpida Kapranou, Amalia Kordelas, Athanasios Stefanidis, Gerasimos Paspatis, Gregorios A. |
author_facet | Velegraki, Magdalini Trikola, Artemis Vasiliadis, Konstantinos Fragaki, Maria Mpitouli, Afroditi Dimas, Ioannis Voudoukis, Evangelos Giannikaki, Elpida Kapranou, Amalia Kordelas, Athanasios Stefanidis, Gerasimos Paspatis, Gregorios A. |
author_sort | Velegraki, Magdalini |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) using the full-thickness resection device (FTRD(®)) is an invasive treatment for colorectal lesions not resectable by conventional endoscopic techniques. This study presents the first Greek experience of the FTRD(®) procedure, assessing the efficacy and safety of EFTR. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 17 consecutive patients treated with the FTRD(®) at 2 referral centers from October 2015 through December 2018. The indications included difficult adenomas (non-lifting and/or at difficult locations), early adenocarcinomas and subepithelial tumors. Primary endpoints were technical success and R0 resection. RESULTS: Technical success and R0 resection were achieved in 82.3% procedures (14/17) and in 87.5% of those with difficult adenomas (8 patients). In the subgroup with carcinomas (n=3), the rate of technical success and R0 resection was 66.6%, while in the subgroup with subepithelial tumors (n=6) the rate was 83.3%. Technical success and R0 resection were significantly lower for lesions >20 mm vs. ≤20 mm (P=0.0429). In the 17 patients a total of 3 adverse events occurred (17.6%) and one of the patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy because of EFTR around the appendix. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed favorable results concerning EFTR feasibility, efficacy and safety, especially for lesions ≤20 mm, non-lifting adenomas, and subepithelial tumors. Technical success, R0 resection, and adverse events rates were comparable with previously published data. Larger randomized studies are needed to better define the clinical benefit and long-term outcomes of EFTR in selected patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6686092 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66860922019-09-01 Endoscopic full-thickness resection of colorectal lesions with the full-thickness resection device: clinical experience from two referral centers in Greece Velegraki, Magdalini Trikola, Artemis Vasiliadis, Konstantinos Fragaki, Maria Mpitouli, Afroditi Dimas, Ioannis Voudoukis, Evangelos Giannikaki, Elpida Kapranou, Amalia Kordelas, Athanasios Stefanidis, Gerasimos Paspatis, Gregorios A. Ann Gastroenterol Original Article BACKGROUND: Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) using the full-thickness resection device (FTRD(®)) is an invasive treatment for colorectal lesions not resectable by conventional endoscopic techniques. This study presents the first Greek experience of the FTRD(®) procedure, assessing the efficacy and safety of EFTR. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 17 consecutive patients treated with the FTRD(®) at 2 referral centers from October 2015 through December 2018. The indications included difficult adenomas (non-lifting and/or at difficult locations), early adenocarcinomas and subepithelial tumors. Primary endpoints were technical success and R0 resection. RESULTS: Technical success and R0 resection were achieved in 82.3% procedures (14/17) and in 87.5% of those with difficult adenomas (8 patients). In the subgroup with carcinomas (n=3), the rate of technical success and R0 resection was 66.6%, while in the subgroup with subepithelial tumors (n=6) the rate was 83.3%. Technical success and R0 resection were significantly lower for lesions >20 mm vs. ≤20 mm (P=0.0429). In the 17 patients a total of 3 adverse events occurred (17.6%) and one of the patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy because of EFTR around the appendix. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed favorable results concerning EFTR feasibility, efficacy and safety, especially for lesions ≤20 mm, non-lifting adenomas, and subepithelial tumors. Technical success, R0 resection, and adverse events rates were comparable with previously published data. Larger randomized studies are needed to better define the clinical benefit and long-term outcomes of EFTR in selected patients. Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology 2019 2019-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6686092/ /pubmed/31474795 http://dx.doi.org/10.20524/aog.2019.0392 Text en Copyright: © Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Velegraki, Magdalini Trikola, Artemis Vasiliadis, Konstantinos Fragaki, Maria Mpitouli, Afroditi Dimas, Ioannis Voudoukis, Evangelos Giannikaki, Elpida Kapranou, Amalia Kordelas, Athanasios Stefanidis, Gerasimos Paspatis, Gregorios A. Endoscopic full-thickness resection of colorectal lesions with the full-thickness resection device: clinical experience from two referral centers in Greece |
title | Endoscopic full-thickness resection of colorectal lesions with the full-thickness resection device: clinical experience from two referral centers in Greece |
title_full | Endoscopic full-thickness resection of colorectal lesions with the full-thickness resection device: clinical experience from two referral centers in Greece |
title_fullStr | Endoscopic full-thickness resection of colorectal lesions with the full-thickness resection device: clinical experience from two referral centers in Greece |
title_full_unstemmed | Endoscopic full-thickness resection of colorectal lesions with the full-thickness resection device: clinical experience from two referral centers in Greece |
title_short | Endoscopic full-thickness resection of colorectal lesions with the full-thickness resection device: clinical experience from two referral centers in Greece |
title_sort | endoscopic full-thickness resection of colorectal lesions with the full-thickness resection device: clinical experience from two referral centers in greece |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6686092/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31474795 http://dx.doi.org/10.20524/aog.2019.0392 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT velegrakimagdalini endoscopicfullthicknessresectionofcolorectallesionswiththefullthicknessresectiondeviceclinicalexperiencefromtworeferralcentersingreece AT trikolaartemis endoscopicfullthicknessresectionofcolorectallesionswiththefullthicknessresectiondeviceclinicalexperiencefromtworeferralcentersingreece AT vasiliadiskonstantinos endoscopicfullthicknessresectionofcolorectallesionswiththefullthicknessresectiondeviceclinicalexperiencefromtworeferralcentersingreece AT fragakimaria endoscopicfullthicknessresectionofcolorectallesionswiththefullthicknessresectiondeviceclinicalexperiencefromtworeferralcentersingreece AT mpitouliafroditi endoscopicfullthicknessresectionofcolorectallesionswiththefullthicknessresectiondeviceclinicalexperiencefromtworeferralcentersingreece AT dimasioannis endoscopicfullthicknessresectionofcolorectallesionswiththefullthicknessresectiondeviceclinicalexperiencefromtworeferralcentersingreece AT voudoukisevangelos endoscopicfullthicknessresectionofcolorectallesionswiththefullthicknessresectiondeviceclinicalexperiencefromtworeferralcentersingreece AT giannikakielpida endoscopicfullthicknessresectionofcolorectallesionswiththefullthicknessresectiondeviceclinicalexperiencefromtworeferralcentersingreece AT kapranouamalia endoscopicfullthicknessresectionofcolorectallesionswiththefullthicknessresectiondeviceclinicalexperiencefromtworeferralcentersingreece AT kordelasathanasios endoscopicfullthicknessresectionofcolorectallesionswiththefullthicknessresectiondeviceclinicalexperiencefromtworeferralcentersingreece AT stefanidisgerasimos endoscopicfullthicknessresectionofcolorectallesionswiththefullthicknessresectiondeviceclinicalexperiencefromtworeferralcentersingreece AT paspatisgregoriosa endoscopicfullthicknessresectionofcolorectallesionswiththefullthicknessresectiondeviceclinicalexperiencefromtworeferralcentersingreece |