Cargando…
Revisiting Trade-offs between Rubisco Kinetic Parameters
[Image: see text] Rubisco is the primary carboxylase of the Calvin cycle, the most abundant enzyme in the biosphere, and one of the best-characterized enzymes. On the basis of correlations between Rubisco kinetic parameters, it is widely posited that constraints embedded in the catalytic mechanism e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American
Chemical Society
2019
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6686151/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31259528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.9b00237 |
_version_ | 1783442505745825792 |
---|---|
author | Flamholz, Avi I. Prywes, Noam Moran, Uri Davidi, Dan Bar-On, Yinon M. Oltrogge, Luke M. Alves, Rui Savage, David Milo, Ron |
author_facet | Flamholz, Avi I. Prywes, Noam Moran, Uri Davidi, Dan Bar-On, Yinon M. Oltrogge, Luke M. Alves, Rui Savage, David Milo, Ron |
author_sort | Flamholz, Avi I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Rubisco is the primary carboxylase of the Calvin cycle, the most abundant enzyme in the biosphere, and one of the best-characterized enzymes. On the basis of correlations between Rubisco kinetic parameters, it is widely posited that constraints embedded in the catalytic mechanism enforce trade-offs between CO(2) specificity, S(C/O), and maximum carboxylation rate, k(cat,C). However, the reasoning that established this view was based on data from ≈20 organisms. Here, we re-examine models of trade-offs in Rubisco catalysis using a data set from ≈300 organisms. Correlations between kinetic parameters are substantially attenuated in this larger data set, with the inverse relationship between k(cat,C) and S(C/O) being a key example. Nonetheless, measured kinetic parameters display extremely limited variation, consistent with a view of Rubisco as a highly constrained enzyme. More than 95% of k(cat,C) values are between 1 and 10 s(–1), and no measured k(cat,C) exceeds 15 s(–1). Similarly, S(C/O) varies by only 30% among Form I Rubiscos and <10% among C(3) plant enzymes. Limited variation in S(C/O) forces a strong positive correlation between the catalytic efficiencies (k(cat)/K(M)) for carboxylation and oxygenation, consistent with a model of Rubisco catalysis in which increasing the rate of addition of CO(2) to the enzyme–substrate complex requires an equal increase in the O(2) addition rate. Altogether, these data suggest that Rubisco evolution is tightly constrained by the physicochemical limits of CO(2)/O(2) discrimination. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6686151 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | American
Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66861512019-08-12 Revisiting Trade-offs between Rubisco Kinetic Parameters Flamholz, Avi I. Prywes, Noam Moran, Uri Davidi, Dan Bar-On, Yinon M. Oltrogge, Luke M. Alves, Rui Savage, David Milo, Ron Biochemistry [Image: see text] Rubisco is the primary carboxylase of the Calvin cycle, the most abundant enzyme in the biosphere, and one of the best-characterized enzymes. On the basis of correlations between Rubisco kinetic parameters, it is widely posited that constraints embedded in the catalytic mechanism enforce trade-offs between CO(2) specificity, S(C/O), and maximum carboxylation rate, k(cat,C). However, the reasoning that established this view was based on data from ≈20 organisms. Here, we re-examine models of trade-offs in Rubisco catalysis using a data set from ≈300 organisms. Correlations between kinetic parameters are substantially attenuated in this larger data set, with the inverse relationship between k(cat,C) and S(C/O) being a key example. Nonetheless, measured kinetic parameters display extremely limited variation, consistent with a view of Rubisco as a highly constrained enzyme. More than 95% of k(cat,C) values are between 1 and 10 s(–1), and no measured k(cat,C) exceeds 15 s(–1). Similarly, S(C/O) varies by only 30% among Form I Rubiscos and <10% among C(3) plant enzymes. Limited variation in S(C/O) forces a strong positive correlation between the catalytic efficiencies (k(cat)/K(M)) for carboxylation and oxygenation, consistent with a model of Rubisco catalysis in which increasing the rate of addition of CO(2) to the enzyme–substrate complex requires an equal increase in the O(2) addition rate. Altogether, these data suggest that Rubisco evolution is tightly constrained by the physicochemical limits of CO(2)/O(2) discrimination. American Chemical Society 2019-07-01 2019-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6686151/ /pubmed/31259528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.9b00237 Text en Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Flamholz, Avi I. Prywes, Noam Moran, Uri Davidi, Dan Bar-On, Yinon M. Oltrogge, Luke M. Alves, Rui Savage, David Milo, Ron Revisiting Trade-offs between Rubisco Kinetic Parameters |
title | Revisiting Trade-offs
between Rubisco Kinetic Parameters |
title_full | Revisiting Trade-offs
between Rubisco Kinetic Parameters |
title_fullStr | Revisiting Trade-offs
between Rubisco Kinetic Parameters |
title_full_unstemmed | Revisiting Trade-offs
between Rubisco Kinetic Parameters |
title_short | Revisiting Trade-offs
between Rubisco Kinetic Parameters |
title_sort | revisiting trade-offs
between rubisco kinetic parameters |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6686151/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31259528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.9b00237 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT flamholzavii revisitingtradeoffsbetweenrubiscokineticparameters AT prywesnoam revisitingtradeoffsbetweenrubiscokineticparameters AT moranuri revisitingtradeoffsbetweenrubiscokineticparameters AT davididan revisitingtradeoffsbetweenrubiscokineticparameters AT baronyinonm revisitingtradeoffsbetweenrubiscokineticparameters AT oltroggelukem revisitingtradeoffsbetweenrubiscokineticparameters AT alvesrui revisitingtradeoffsbetweenrubiscokineticparameters AT savagedavid revisitingtradeoffsbetweenrubiscokineticparameters AT miloron revisitingtradeoffsbetweenrubiscokineticparameters |