Cargando…

Usefulness of intra-operative neuromuscular blockade monitoring and reversal agents for postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND: Complete avoidance of residual neuromuscular blockade (RNMB) during the postoperative period has not yet been achieved in current anesthesia practice. Evidently, compliance with NMB monitoring is persistently low, and the risk of RNMB during the perioperative period remains underestimate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Domenech, Gonzalo, Kampel, Matías A., García Guzzo, María E., Novas, Delfina Sánchez, Terrasa, Sergio A., Fornari, Gustavo Garcia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6686238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31390986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0817-4
_version_ 1783442519473782784
author Domenech, Gonzalo
Kampel, Matías A.
García Guzzo, María E.
Novas, Delfina Sánchez
Terrasa, Sergio A.
Fornari, Gustavo Garcia
author_facet Domenech, Gonzalo
Kampel, Matías A.
García Guzzo, María E.
Novas, Delfina Sánchez
Terrasa, Sergio A.
Fornari, Gustavo Garcia
author_sort Domenech, Gonzalo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Complete avoidance of residual neuromuscular blockade (RNMB) during the postoperative period has not yet been achieved in current anesthesia practice. Evidently, compliance with NMB monitoring is persistently low, and the risk of RNMB during the perioperative period remains underestimated. To our knowledge, no publications have reported the incidence of RNMB in a university hospital where access to quantitative NMB monitoring and sugammadex is unlimited and where NMB management is not protocolised. The primary aim of this study was to estimate the incidence of RNMB in patients managed with or without sugammadex or neostigmine as antagonists and quantitative NMB monitoring in the operating room. The secondary aim was to explore the associations between RNMB and potentially related variables. METHODS: This retrospective observational cohort study was conducted at a tertiary referral university hospital in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Records created between June 2015 and December 2015 were reviewed. In total, 240 consecutive patients who had undergone elective surgical procedures requiring NMB were included. All patients were monitored via acceleromyography at the adductor pollicis muscle within 5 min of arrival in the postanaesthesia care unit (PACU). Scheduled recovery in the intensive care unit was the only exclusion criterion. RESULTS: RNMB was present in 1.6% patients who received intra-operative quantitative NMB monitoring and 32% patients whose NMB was not monitored (P <  0.01). Multivariable analysis revealed that the use of intra-operative quantitative NMB monitoring and sugammadex were associated with a lower incidence of RNMB, with calculated odds ratios of 0.04 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.005 to 0.401) and 0.18 (95% CI: 0.046 to 0.727), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study suggest that intra-operative quantitative NMB monitoring and use of sugammadex are associated with a decreased incidence of RNMB in the PACU, reinforcing the contention that the optimal strategy for RNMB avoidance is the use of quantitative NMB monitoring and eventual use of reversal agents, if needed, prior to emergence from anaesthesia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6686238
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66862382019-08-12 Usefulness of intra-operative neuromuscular blockade monitoring and reversal agents for postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade: a retrospective observational study Domenech, Gonzalo Kampel, Matías A. García Guzzo, María E. Novas, Delfina Sánchez Terrasa, Sergio A. Fornari, Gustavo Garcia BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Complete avoidance of residual neuromuscular blockade (RNMB) during the postoperative period has not yet been achieved in current anesthesia practice. Evidently, compliance with NMB monitoring is persistently low, and the risk of RNMB during the perioperative period remains underestimated. To our knowledge, no publications have reported the incidence of RNMB in a university hospital where access to quantitative NMB monitoring and sugammadex is unlimited and where NMB management is not protocolised. The primary aim of this study was to estimate the incidence of RNMB in patients managed with or without sugammadex or neostigmine as antagonists and quantitative NMB monitoring in the operating room. The secondary aim was to explore the associations between RNMB and potentially related variables. METHODS: This retrospective observational cohort study was conducted at a tertiary referral university hospital in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Records created between June 2015 and December 2015 were reviewed. In total, 240 consecutive patients who had undergone elective surgical procedures requiring NMB were included. All patients were monitored via acceleromyography at the adductor pollicis muscle within 5 min of arrival in the postanaesthesia care unit (PACU). Scheduled recovery in the intensive care unit was the only exclusion criterion. RESULTS: RNMB was present in 1.6% patients who received intra-operative quantitative NMB monitoring and 32% patients whose NMB was not monitored (P <  0.01). Multivariable analysis revealed that the use of intra-operative quantitative NMB monitoring and sugammadex were associated with a lower incidence of RNMB, with calculated odds ratios of 0.04 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.005 to 0.401) and 0.18 (95% CI: 0.046 to 0.727), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study suggest that intra-operative quantitative NMB monitoring and use of sugammadex are associated with a decreased incidence of RNMB in the PACU, reinforcing the contention that the optimal strategy for RNMB avoidance is the use of quantitative NMB monitoring and eventual use of reversal agents, if needed, prior to emergence from anaesthesia. BioMed Central 2019-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6686238/ /pubmed/31390986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0817-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Domenech, Gonzalo
Kampel, Matías A.
García Guzzo, María E.
Novas, Delfina Sánchez
Terrasa, Sergio A.
Fornari, Gustavo Garcia
Usefulness of intra-operative neuromuscular blockade monitoring and reversal agents for postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade: a retrospective observational study
title Usefulness of intra-operative neuromuscular blockade monitoring and reversal agents for postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade: a retrospective observational study
title_full Usefulness of intra-operative neuromuscular blockade monitoring and reversal agents for postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade: a retrospective observational study
title_fullStr Usefulness of intra-operative neuromuscular blockade monitoring and reversal agents for postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade: a retrospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed Usefulness of intra-operative neuromuscular blockade monitoring and reversal agents for postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade: a retrospective observational study
title_short Usefulness of intra-operative neuromuscular blockade monitoring and reversal agents for postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade: a retrospective observational study
title_sort usefulness of intra-operative neuromuscular blockade monitoring and reversal agents for postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade: a retrospective observational study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6686238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31390986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0817-4
work_keys_str_mv AT domenechgonzalo usefulnessofintraoperativeneuromuscularblockademonitoringandreversalagentsforpostoperativeresidualneuromuscularblockadearetrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT kampelmatiasa usefulnessofintraoperativeneuromuscularblockademonitoringandreversalagentsforpostoperativeresidualneuromuscularblockadearetrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT garciaguzzomariae usefulnessofintraoperativeneuromuscularblockademonitoringandreversalagentsforpostoperativeresidualneuromuscularblockadearetrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT novasdelfinasanchez usefulnessofintraoperativeneuromuscularblockademonitoringandreversalagentsforpostoperativeresidualneuromuscularblockadearetrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT terrasasergioa usefulnessofintraoperativeneuromuscularblockademonitoringandreversalagentsforpostoperativeresidualneuromuscularblockadearetrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT fornarigustavogarcia usefulnessofintraoperativeneuromuscularblockademonitoringandreversalagentsforpostoperativeresidualneuromuscularblockadearetrospectiveobservationalstudy