Cargando…

Are polar bear habitat resource selection functions developed from 1985–1995 data still useful?

1. Greenhouse‐gas‐induced warming in the Arctic has caused declines in sea ice extent and changed its composition, raising concerns by all circumpolar nations for polar bear conservation. 2. Negative impacts have been observed in three well‐studied polar bear subpopulations. Most subpopulations, how...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Durner, George M., Douglas, David C., Atwood, Todd C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6686286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31410267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5401
_version_ 1783442530627485696
author Durner, George M.
Douglas, David C.
Atwood, Todd C.
author_facet Durner, George M.
Douglas, David C.
Atwood, Todd C.
author_sort Durner, George M.
collection PubMed
description 1. Greenhouse‐gas‐induced warming in the Arctic has caused declines in sea ice extent and changed its composition, raising concerns by all circumpolar nations for polar bear conservation. 2. Negative impacts have been observed in three well‐studied polar bear subpopulations. Most subpopulations, however, receive little or no direct monitoring, hence, resource selection functions (RSF) may provide a useful proxy of polar bear distributions. However, the efficacy of RSFs constructed from past data, that is, reference RSFs, may be degraded under contemporary conditions, especially in a rapidly changing environment. 3. We assessed published Arctic‐wide reference RSFs using tracking data from adult female polar bears captured in the Beaufort Sea. We compared telemetry‐derived seasonal distributions of polar bears to RSF‐defined optimal sea ice habitat during the period of RSF model development, 1985–1995, and two subsequent periods with diminished sea ice: 1996–2006 and 2007–2016. From these comparisons, we assessed the applicability of the reference RSFs for contemporary polar bear conservation. 4. In the two decades following the 1985–1995 reference period, use and availability of optimal habitat by polar bears declined during the ice melt, ice minimum, and ice growth seasons. During the ice maximum season (i.e., winter), polar bears used the best habitat available, which changed relatively little across the three decades of study. During the ice melt, ice minimum, and ice growth seasons, optimal habitat in areas used by polar bears decreased and was displaced north and east of the Alaska Beaufort Sea coast. As optimal habitat diminished in these seasons, polar bears expanded their range and occupied greater areas of suboptimal habitat. 5. Synthesis and applications: Sea ice declines due to climate change continue to challenge polar bears and their conservation. The distribution of Southern Beaufort Sea polar bears remained similar during the ice maximum season, so the reference RSFs developed from data collected >20 years ago continue to accurately model their winter distribution. In contrast, reference RSFs for the ice transitional and minimum seasons showed diminished predictive efficacy but were useful in revealing that contemporary polar bears have been increasingly forced to use suboptimal habitats during those seasons.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6686286
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66862862019-08-13 Are polar bear habitat resource selection functions developed from 1985–1995 data still useful? Durner, George M. Douglas, David C. Atwood, Todd C. Ecol Evol Original Research 1. Greenhouse‐gas‐induced warming in the Arctic has caused declines in sea ice extent and changed its composition, raising concerns by all circumpolar nations for polar bear conservation. 2. Negative impacts have been observed in three well‐studied polar bear subpopulations. Most subpopulations, however, receive little or no direct monitoring, hence, resource selection functions (RSF) may provide a useful proxy of polar bear distributions. However, the efficacy of RSFs constructed from past data, that is, reference RSFs, may be degraded under contemporary conditions, especially in a rapidly changing environment. 3. We assessed published Arctic‐wide reference RSFs using tracking data from adult female polar bears captured in the Beaufort Sea. We compared telemetry‐derived seasonal distributions of polar bears to RSF‐defined optimal sea ice habitat during the period of RSF model development, 1985–1995, and two subsequent periods with diminished sea ice: 1996–2006 and 2007–2016. From these comparisons, we assessed the applicability of the reference RSFs for contemporary polar bear conservation. 4. In the two decades following the 1985–1995 reference period, use and availability of optimal habitat by polar bears declined during the ice melt, ice minimum, and ice growth seasons. During the ice maximum season (i.e., winter), polar bears used the best habitat available, which changed relatively little across the three decades of study. During the ice melt, ice minimum, and ice growth seasons, optimal habitat in areas used by polar bears decreased and was displaced north and east of the Alaska Beaufort Sea coast. As optimal habitat diminished in these seasons, polar bears expanded their range and occupied greater areas of suboptimal habitat. 5. Synthesis and applications: Sea ice declines due to climate change continue to challenge polar bears and their conservation. The distribution of Southern Beaufort Sea polar bears remained similar during the ice maximum season, so the reference RSFs developed from data collected >20 years ago continue to accurately model their winter distribution. In contrast, reference RSFs for the ice transitional and minimum seasons showed diminished predictive efficacy but were useful in revealing that contemporary polar bears have been increasingly forced to use suboptimal habitats during those seasons. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6686286/ /pubmed/31410267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5401 Text en Published 2019. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Durner, George M.
Douglas, David C.
Atwood, Todd C.
Are polar bear habitat resource selection functions developed from 1985–1995 data still useful?
title Are polar bear habitat resource selection functions developed from 1985–1995 data still useful?
title_full Are polar bear habitat resource selection functions developed from 1985–1995 data still useful?
title_fullStr Are polar bear habitat resource selection functions developed from 1985–1995 data still useful?
title_full_unstemmed Are polar bear habitat resource selection functions developed from 1985–1995 data still useful?
title_short Are polar bear habitat resource selection functions developed from 1985–1995 data still useful?
title_sort are polar bear habitat resource selection functions developed from 1985–1995 data still useful?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6686286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31410267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5401
work_keys_str_mv AT durnergeorgem arepolarbearhabitatresourceselectionfunctionsdevelopedfrom19851995datastilluseful
AT douglasdavidc arepolarbearhabitatresourceselectionfunctionsdevelopedfrom19851995datastilluseful
AT atwoodtoddc arepolarbearhabitatresourceselectionfunctionsdevelopedfrom19851995datastilluseful