Cargando…

Corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure assessment after penetrating keratoplasty for non keratoconic patients, long term results

BACKGROUND: To evaluate corneal biomechanical properties by the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) in non keratoconic patients underwent penetrating keratoplasty (PK). METHODS: Corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann- correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg), cornea-compensated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abd Elaziz, Mohamed Samy, Elsobky, Hoda Mohamed, Zaky, Adel Galal, Hassan, Eslam Ahmed Maher, KhalafAllah, Mahmoud Tawfik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6686420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31391006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-019-1186-y
_version_ 1783442561470300160
author Abd Elaziz, Mohamed Samy
Elsobky, Hoda Mohamed
Zaky, Adel Galal
Hassan, Eslam Ahmed Maher
KhalafAllah, Mahmoud Tawfik
author_facet Abd Elaziz, Mohamed Samy
Elsobky, Hoda Mohamed
Zaky, Adel Galal
Hassan, Eslam Ahmed Maher
KhalafAllah, Mahmoud Tawfik
author_sort Abd Elaziz, Mohamed Samy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate corneal biomechanical properties by the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) in non keratoconic patients underwent penetrating keratoplasty (PK). METHODS: Corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann- correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg), cornea-compensated IOP (IOPcc) using the ORA, and central graft thickness (CGT) were measured in 30 eyes at least two years after penetrating keratoplasty for non keratoconic indications. IOP using the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) was also obtained after compensation for graft thickness and astigmatism. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 33.1 ± 10.13 years; indications for PK were herpetic corneal scar (53.3%), corneal stromal dystrophy (23.3%), traumatic corneal opacity (10%), chemical corneal opacity (6.7%), and Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (6.7%). Mean CH and CRF were 8.52 ± 1.81 mmHg, and 8.56 ± 1.59 mmHg, respectively. Mean CGT was 532.43 ± 30 μm. Mean IOP GAT, IOPg, and IOPcc were 11.88 ± 3.66, 14.64 ± 4.08, and 17.27 ± 4.60 mmHg, respectively (P < 0.001). No significant association was found between CGT and IOP readings obtained using either the ORA or GAT. There were significant negative association between CH with both IOP GAT and IOPcc, while CRF had significant positive association with IOPg. CONCLUSION: After penetrating keratoplasty for non keratoconic patients, graft biomechanics does not return to average values even 2 years after the operation; moreover, intraocular pressure measurement with ORA gives higher values than thickness compensated GAT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6686420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66864202019-08-12 Corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure assessment after penetrating keratoplasty for non keratoconic patients, long term results Abd Elaziz, Mohamed Samy Elsobky, Hoda Mohamed Zaky, Adel Galal Hassan, Eslam Ahmed Maher KhalafAllah, Mahmoud Tawfik BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: To evaluate corneal biomechanical properties by the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) in non keratoconic patients underwent penetrating keratoplasty (PK). METHODS: Corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann- correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg), cornea-compensated IOP (IOPcc) using the ORA, and central graft thickness (CGT) were measured in 30 eyes at least two years after penetrating keratoplasty for non keratoconic indications. IOP using the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) was also obtained after compensation for graft thickness and astigmatism. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 33.1 ± 10.13 years; indications for PK were herpetic corneal scar (53.3%), corneal stromal dystrophy (23.3%), traumatic corneal opacity (10%), chemical corneal opacity (6.7%), and Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (6.7%). Mean CH and CRF were 8.52 ± 1.81 mmHg, and 8.56 ± 1.59 mmHg, respectively. Mean CGT was 532.43 ± 30 μm. Mean IOP GAT, IOPg, and IOPcc were 11.88 ± 3.66, 14.64 ± 4.08, and 17.27 ± 4.60 mmHg, respectively (P < 0.001). No significant association was found between CGT and IOP readings obtained using either the ORA or GAT. There were significant negative association between CH with both IOP GAT and IOPcc, while CRF had significant positive association with IOPg. CONCLUSION: After penetrating keratoplasty for non keratoconic patients, graft biomechanics does not return to average values even 2 years after the operation; moreover, intraocular pressure measurement with ORA gives higher values than thickness compensated GAT. BioMed Central 2019-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6686420/ /pubmed/31391006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-019-1186-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Abd Elaziz, Mohamed Samy
Elsobky, Hoda Mohamed
Zaky, Adel Galal
Hassan, Eslam Ahmed Maher
KhalafAllah, Mahmoud Tawfik
Corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure assessment after penetrating keratoplasty for non keratoconic patients, long term results
title Corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure assessment after penetrating keratoplasty for non keratoconic patients, long term results
title_full Corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure assessment after penetrating keratoplasty for non keratoconic patients, long term results
title_fullStr Corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure assessment after penetrating keratoplasty for non keratoconic patients, long term results
title_full_unstemmed Corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure assessment after penetrating keratoplasty for non keratoconic patients, long term results
title_short Corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure assessment after penetrating keratoplasty for non keratoconic patients, long term results
title_sort corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure assessment after penetrating keratoplasty for non keratoconic patients, long term results
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6686420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31391006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-019-1186-y
work_keys_str_mv AT abdelazizmohamedsamy cornealbiomechanicsandintraocularpressureassessmentafterpenetratingkeratoplastyfornonkeratoconicpatientslongtermresults
AT elsobkyhodamohamed cornealbiomechanicsandintraocularpressureassessmentafterpenetratingkeratoplastyfornonkeratoconicpatientslongtermresults
AT zakyadelgalal cornealbiomechanicsandintraocularpressureassessmentafterpenetratingkeratoplastyfornonkeratoconicpatientslongtermresults
AT hassaneslamahmedmaher cornealbiomechanicsandintraocularpressureassessmentafterpenetratingkeratoplastyfornonkeratoconicpatientslongtermresults
AT khalafallahmahmoudtawfik cornealbiomechanicsandintraocularpressureassessmentafterpenetratingkeratoplastyfornonkeratoconicpatientslongtermresults