Cargando…

P.R.O.P.S. — A novel Pre-Operative Predictive Score for unresectability in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases being considered for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC)

BACKGROUND: Twenty to thirty percent of planned cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS and HIPEC) procedures are abandoned intra-operatively. Pre-operative factors associated with unresectability identified previously were used to develop a Pre-Operative Predictive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yong, Zachary Zihui, Tan, Grace Hwei Ching, Shannon, Nicholas, Chia, Claramae, Teo, Melissa Ching Ching
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6686533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31391066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-019-1673-x
_version_ 1783442588704964608
author Yong, Zachary Zihui
Tan, Grace Hwei Ching
Shannon, Nicholas
Chia, Claramae
Teo, Melissa Ching Ching
author_facet Yong, Zachary Zihui
Tan, Grace Hwei Ching
Shannon, Nicholas
Chia, Claramae
Teo, Melissa Ching Ching
author_sort Yong, Zachary Zihui
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Twenty to thirty percent of planned cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS and HIPEC) procedures are abandoned intra-operatively. Pre-operative factors associated with unresectability identified previously were used to develop a Pre-Operative Predictive Score (PROPS), which was compared with current selection criteria—Peritoneal Surface Disease Severity Score (PSDSS), Verwaal’s Prognostic Score (PS) and Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases Prognostic Surgical Score (COMPASS), to determine which score provides the best prediction for unresectability. METHODS: Fifty-six patients with peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin were included. Beta-coefficient values of significant variables (p < 0.05) were determined from multivariate analysis to develop PROPS. PROPS, PSDSS, PS and COMPASS were compared using a receiver operating characteristic curve to calculate its accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: PROPS consisted of nine patient and tumour factors which were categorised into three groups: (i) poor tumour biology: previous inadequate resection, underwent multiple lines of chemotherapy and poorly differentiated or signet cell histology; (ii) heavy tumour burden: abdominal distension, palpable abdominal mass and computed tomography findings of ascites, small bowel disease and/or omental thickening; and (iii) active tumour proliferation: elevated tumour markers. Overall, PROPS achieved 86% accuracy with 100% sensitivity and 68% specificity, PSDSS achieved 85% accuracy with 100% sensitivity and 63% specificity, PS achieved 73% accuracy with 100% sensitivity and 68% specificity and COMPASS achieved 61% accuracy with 27% sensitivity and 100% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: PROPS is more effective in predicting unresectability as compared to PSDSS, PS and COMPASS, and has the added advantage of using solely pre-operative factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6686533
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66865332019-08-12 P.R.O.P.S. — A novel Pre-Operative Predictive Score for unresectability in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases being considered for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) Yong, Zachary Zihui Tan, Grace Hwei Ching Shannon, Nicholas Chia, Claramae Teo, Melissa Ching Ching World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Twenty to thirty percent of planned cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS and HIPEC) procedures are abandoned intra-operatively. Pre-operative factors associated with unresectability identified previously were used to develop a Pre-Operative Predictive Score (PROPS), which was compared with current selection criteria—Peritoneal Surface Disease Severity Score (PSDSS), Verwaal’s Prognostic Score (PS) and Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases Prognostic Surgical Score (COMPASS), to determine which score provides the best prediction for unresectability. METHODS: Fifty-six patients with peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin were included. Beta-coefficient values of significant variables (p < 0.05) were determined from multivariate analysis to develop PROPS. PROPS, PSDSS, PS and COMPASS were compared using a receiver operating characteristic curve to calculate its accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: PROPS consisted of nine patient and tumour factors which were categorised into three groups: (i) poor tumour biology: previous inadequate resection, underwent multiple lines of chemotherapy and poorly differentiated or signet cell histology; (ii) heavy tumour burden: abdominal distension, palpable abdominal mass and computed tomography findings of ascites, small bowel disease and/or omental thickening; and (iii) active tumour proliferation: elevated tumour markers. Overall, PROPS achieved 86% accuracy with 100% sensitivity and 68% specificity, PSDSS achieved 85% accuracy with 100% sensitivity and 63% specificity, PS achieved 73% accuracy with 100% sensitivity and 68% specificity and COMPASS achieved 61% accuracy with 27% sensitivity and 100% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: PROPS is more effective in predicting unresectability as compared to PSDSS, PS and COMPASS, and has the added advantage of using solely pre-operative factors. BioMed Central 2019-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6686533/ /pubmed/31391066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-019-1673-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Yong, Zachary Zihui
Tan, Grace Hwei Ching
Shannon, Nicholas
Chia, Claramae
Teo, Melissa Ching Ching
P.R.O.P.S. — A novel Pre-Operative Predictive Score for unresectability in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases being considered for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC)
title P.R.O.P.S. — A novel Pre-Operative Predictive Score for unresectability in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases being considered for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC)
title_full P.R.O.P.S. — A novel Pre-Operative Predictive Score for unresectability in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases being considered for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC)
title_fullStr P.R.O.P.S. — A novel Pre-Operative Predictive Score for unresectability in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases being considered for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC)
title_full_unstemmed P.R.O.P.S. — A novel Pre-Operative Predictive Score for unresectability in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases being considered for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC)
title_short P.R.O.P.S. — A novel Pre-Operative Predictive Score for unresectability in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases being considered for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC)
title_sort p.r.o.p.s. — a novel pre-operative predictive score for unresectability in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases being considered for cytoreductive surgery (crs) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (hipec)
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6686533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31391066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-019-1673-x
work_keys_str_mv AT yongzacharyzihui propsanovelpreoperativepredictivescoreforunresectabilityinpatientswithcolorectalperitonealmetastasesbeingconsideredforcytoreductivesurgerycrsandhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapyhipec
AT tangracehweiching propsanovelpreoperativepredictivescoreforunresectabilityinpatientswithcolorectalperitonealmetastasesbeingconsideredforcytoreductivesurgerycrsandhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapyhipec
AT shannonnicholas propsanovelpreoperativepredictivescoreforunresectabilityinpatientswithcolorectalperitonealmetastasesbeingconsideredforcytoreductivesurgerycrsandhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapyhipec
AT chiaclaramae propsanovelpreoperativepredictivescoreforunresectabilityinpatientswithcolorectalperitonealmetastasesbeingconsideredforcytoreductivesurgerycrsandhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapyhipec
AT teomelissachingching propsanovelpreoperativepredictivescoreforunresectabilityinpatientswithcolorectalperitonealmetastasesbeingconsideredforcytoreductivesurgerycrsandhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapyhipec