Cargando…

Predictors of the effects of treatment for shoulder pain: protocol of an individual participant data meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Shoulder pain is one of the most common presentations of musculoskeletal pain with a 1-month population prevalence of between 7 and 26%. The overall prognosis of shoulder pain is highly variable with 40% of patients reporting persistent pain 1 year after consulting their primary care cli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Windt, Danielle A., Burke, Danielle L., Babatunde, Opeyemi, Hattle, Miriam, McRobert, Cliona, Littlewood, Chris, Wynne-Jones, Gwenllian, Chesterton, Linda, van der Heijden, Geert J. M. G., Winters, Jan C., Rhon, Daniel I., Bennell, Kim, Roddy, Edward, Heneghan, Carl, Beard, David, Rees, Jonathan L., Riley, Richard D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6686538/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31410370
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41512-019-0061-x
_version_ 1783442589873078272
author van der Windt, Danielle A.
Burke, Danielle L.
Babatunde, Opeyemi
Hattle, Miriam
McRobert, Cliona
Littlewood, Chris
Wynne-Jones, Gwenllian
Chesterton, Linda
van der Heijden, Geert J. M. G.
Winters, Jan C.
Rhon, Daniel I.
Bennell, Kim
Roddy, Edward
Heneghan, Carl
Beard, David
Rees, Jonathan L.
Riley, Richard D.
author_facet van der Windt, Danielle A.
Burke, Danielle L.
Babatunde, Opeyemi
Hattle, Miriam
McRobert, Cliona
Littlewood, Chris
Wynne-Jones, Gwenllian
Chesterton, Linda
van der Heijden, Geert J. M. G.
Winters, Jan C.
Rhon, Daniel I.
Bennell, Kim
Roddy, Edward
Heneghan, Carl
Beard, David
Rees, Jonathan L.
Riley, Richard D.
author_sort van der Windt, Danielle A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Shoulder pain is one of the most common presentations of musculoskeletal pain with a 1-month population prevalence of between 7 and 26%. The overall prognosis of shoulder pain is highly variable with 40% of patients reporting persistent pain 1 year after consulting their primary care clinician. Despite evidence for prognostic value of a range of patient and disease characteristics, it is not clear whether these factors also predict (moderate) the effect of specific treatments (such as corticosteroid injection, exercise, or surgery). OBJECTIVES: This study aims to identify predictors of treatment effect (i.e. treatment moderators or effect modifiers) by investigating the association between a number of pre-defined individual-level factors and the effects of commonly used treatments on shoulder pain and disability outcomes. METHODS: This will be a meta-analysis using individual participant data (IPD). Eligible trials investigating the effectiveness of advice and analgesics, corticosteroid injection, physiotherapy-led exercise, psychological interventions, and/or surgical treatment in patients with shoulder conditions will be identified from systematic reviews and an updated systematic search for trials, and risk of bias will be assessed. Authors of all eligible trials will be approached for data sharing. Outcomes measured will be shoulder pain and disability, and our previous work has identified candidate predictors. The main analysis will be conducted using hierarchical one-stage IPD meta-analysis models, examining the effect of treatment-predictor interaction on outcome for each of the candidate predictors and describing relevant subgroup effects where significant interaction effects are detected. Random effects will be used to account for clustering and heterogeneity. Sensitivity analyses will be based on (i) exclusion of trials at high risk of bias, (ii) use of restricted cubic splines to model potential non-linear associations for candidate predictors measured on a continuous scale, and (iii) the use of a two-stage IPD meta-analysis framework. DISCUSSION: Our study will collate, appraise, and synthesise IPD from multiple studies to examine potential predictors of treatment effect in order to assess the potential for better and more efficient targeting of specific treatments for individuals with shoulder pain. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018088298
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6686538
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66865382019-08-13 Predictors of the effects of treatment for shoulder pain: protocol of an individual participant data meta-analysis van der Windt, Danielle A. Burke, Danielle L. Babatunde, Opeyemi Hattle, Miriam McRobert, Cliona Littlewood, Chris Wynne-Jones, Gwenllian Chesterton, Linda van der Heijden, Geert J. M. G. Winters, Jan C. Rhon, Daniel I. Bennell, Kim Roddy, Edward Heneghan, Carl Beard, David Rees, Jonathan L. Riley, Richard D. Diagn Progn Res Protocol BACKGROUND: Shoulder pain is one of the most common presentations of musculoskeletal pain with a 1-month population prevalence of between 7 and 26%. The overall prognosis of shoulder pain is highly variable with 40% of patients reporting persistent pain 1 year after consulting their primary care clinician. Despite evidence for prognostic value of a range of patient and disease characteristics, it is not clear whether these factors also predict (moderate) the effect of specific treatments (such as corticosteroid injection, exercise, or surgery). OBJECTIVES: This study aims to identify predictors of treatment effect (i.e. treatment moderators or effect modifiers) by investigating the association between a number of pre-defined individual-level factors and the effects of commonly used treatments on shoulder pain and disability outcomes. METHODS: This will be a meta-analysis using individual participant data (IPD). Eligible trials investigating the effectiveness of advice and analgesics, corticosteroid injection, physiotherapy-led exercise, psychological interventions, and/or surgical treatment in patients with shoulder conditions will be identified from systematic reviews and an updated systematic search for trials, and risk of bias will be assessed. Authors of all eligible trials will be approached for data sharing. Outcomes measured will be shoulder pain and disability, and our previous work has identified candidate predictors. The main analysis will be conducted using hierarchical one-stage IPD meta-analysis models, examining the effect of treatment-predictor interaction on outcome for each of the candidate predictors and describing relevant subgroup effects where significant interaction effects are detected. Random effects will be used to account for clustering and heterogeneity. Sensitivity analyses will be based on (i) exclusion of trials at high risk of bias, (ii) use of restricted cubic splines to model potential non-linear associations for candidate predictors measured on a continuous scale, and (iii) the use of a two-stage IPD meta-analysis framework. DISCUSSION: Our study will collate, appraise, and synthesise IPD from multiple studies to examine potential predictors of treatment effect in order to assess the potential for better and more efficient targeting of specific treatments for individuals with shoulder pain. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018088298 BioMed Central 2019-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6686538/ /pubmed/31410370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41512-019-0061-x Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Protocol
van der Windt, Danielle A.
Burke, Danielle L.
Babatunde, Opeyemi
Hattle, Miriam
McRobert, Cliona
Littlewood, Chris
Wynne-Jones, Gwenllian
Chesterton, Linda
van der Heijden, Geert J. M. G.
Winters, Jan C.
Rhon, Daniel I.
Bennell, Kim
Roddy, Edward
Heneghan, Carl
Beard, David
Rees, Jonathan L.
Riley, Richard D.
Predictors of the effects of treatment for shoulder pain: protocol of an individual participant data meta-analysis
title Predictors of the effects of treatment for shoulder pain: protocol of an individual participant data meta-analysis
title_full Predictors of the effects of treatment for shoulder pain: protocol of an individual participant data meta-analysis
title_fullStr Predictors of the effects of treatment for shoulder pain: protocol of an individual participant data meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Predictors of the effects of treatment for shoulder pain: protocol of an individual participant data meta-analysis
title_short Predictors of the effects of treatment for shoulder pain: protocol of an individual participant data meta-analysis
title_sort predictors of the effects of treatment for shoulder pain: protocol of an individual participant data meta-analysis
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6686538/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31410370
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41512-019-0061-x
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderwindtdaniellea predictorsoftheeffectsoftreatmentforshoulderpainprotocolofanindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT burkedaniellel predictorsoftheeffectsoftreatmentforshoulderpainprotocolofanindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT babatundeopeyemi predictorsoftheeffectsoftreatmentforshoulderpainprotocolofanindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT hattlemiriam predictorsoftheeffectsoftreatmentforshoulderpainprotocolofanindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT mcrobertcliona predictorsoftheeffectsoftreatmentforshoulderpainprotocolofanindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT littlewoodchris predictorsoftheeffectsoftreatmentforshoulderpainprotocolofanindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT wynnejonesgwenllian predictorsoftheeffectsoftreatmentforshoulderpainprotocolofanindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT chestertonlinda predictorsoftheeffectsoftreatmentforshoulderpainprotocolofanindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT vanderheijdengeertjmg predictorsoftheeffectsoftreatmentforshoulderpainprotocolofanindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT wintersjanc predictorsoftheeffectsoftreatmentforshoulderpainprotocolofanindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT rhondanieli predictorsoftheeffectsoftreatmentforshoulderpainprotocolofanindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT bennellkim predictorsoftheeffectsoftreatmentforshoulderpainprotocolofanindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT roddyedward predictorsoftheeffectsoftreatmentforshoulderpainprotocolofanindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT heneghancarl predictorsoftheeffectsoftreatmentforshoulderpainprotocolofanindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT bearddavid predictorsoftheeffectsoftreatmentforshoulderpainprotocolofanindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT reesjonathanl predictorsoftheeffectsoftreatmentforshoulderpainprotocolofanindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis
AT rileyrichardd predictorsoftheeffectsoftreatmentforshoulderpainprotocolofanindividualparticipantdatametaanalysis