Cargando…

Unplanned readmission prevention by a geriatric emergency network for transitional care (URGENT): a prospective before-after study

BACKGROUND: URGENT is a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) based nurse-led care model in the emergency department (ED) with geriatric follow-up after ED discharge aiming to prevent unplanned ED readmissions. METHODS: A quasi-experimental study (sequential design with two cohorts) was conducted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heeren, Pieter, Devriendt, Els, Fieuws, Steffen, Wellens, Nathalie I. H., Deschodt, Mieke, Flamaing, Johan, Sabbe, Marc, Milisen, Koen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6686568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31390994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1233-9
_version_ 1783442596984520704
author Heeren, Pieter
Devriendt, Els
Fieuws, Steffen
Wellens, Nathalie I. H.
Deschodt, Mieke
Flamaing, Johan
Sabbe, Marc
Milisen, Koen
author_facet Heeren, Pieter
Devriendt, Els
Fieuws, Steffen
Wellens, Nathalie I. H.
Deschodt, Mieke
Flamaing, Johan
Sabbe, Marc
Milisen, Koen
author_sort Heeren, Pieter
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: URGENT is a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) based nurse-led care model in the emergency department (ED) with geriatric follow-up after ED discharge aiming to prevent unplanned ED readmissions. METHODS: A quasi-experimental study (sequential design with two cohorts) was conducted in the ED of University Hospitals Leuven (Belgium). Dutch-speaking, community-dwelling ED patients aged 70 years or older were eligible for enrolment. Patients in the control cohort received usual care. Patient in the intervention cohort received the URGENT care model. A geriatric emergency nurse conducted CGA and interdisciplinary care planning among older patients identified as at risk for adverse events (e.g. unplanned ED readmission, functional decline) with the interRAI ED Screener© and clinical judgement of ED staff. Case manager follow-up was offered to at risk patients without hospitalization after index ED visit. For inpatients, geriatric follow-up was guaranteed on an acute geriatric ward or by the inpatient geriatric consultation team on a non-geriatric ward if considered necessary. Primary outcome was unplanned 90-day ED readmission. Secondary outcomes were ED length of stay (LOS), hospitalization rate, in-hospital LOS, 90-day higher level of care, 90-day functional decline and 90-day post-hospitalization mortality. RESULTS: Almost half of intervention patients (404/886 = 45.6%) were categorized at risk. These received on average seven advices. Adherence rate to advices on the ED, during hospitalization and in community care was 86.1, 74.6 and 34.1%, respectively. One out of four at risk patients without hospitalization after index ED visit accepted case manager follow-up. Unplanned ED readmission occurred in 170 of 768 (22.1%) control patients and in 205 of 857 (23.9%) intervention patients (p = .11). The intervention group had shorter ED LOS (12.7 h versus 19.1 h in the control group; p < .001), but higher rate of hospitalization (70.0% versus 67.0% in the control group; p = .003). CONCLUSIONS: The URGENT care model shortened ED LOS and increased the hospitalization rate, but did not prevent unplanned ED readmissions. A geriatric emergency nurse could improve in-hospital patient management, but failed to introduce substantial out-hospital case-management. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol of this study was registered retrospectively with ISRCTN (ISRCTN91449949; registered 20 June 2017). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12877-019-1233-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6686568
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66865682019-08-12 Unplanned readmission prevention by a geriatric emergency network for transitional care (URGENT): a prospective before-after study Heeren, Pieter Devriendt, Els Fieuws, Steffen Wellens, Nathalie I. H. Deschodt, Mieke Flamaing, Johan Sabbe, Marc Milisen, Koen BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: URGENT is a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) based nurse-led care model in the emergency department (ED) with geriatric follow-up after ED discharge aiming to prevent unplanned ED readmissions. METHODS: A quasi-experimental study (sequential design with two cohorts) was conducted in the ED of University Hospitals Leuven (Belgium). Dutch-speaking, community-dwelling ED patients aged 70 years or older were eligible for enrolment. Patients in the control cohort received usual care. Patient in the intervention cohort received the URGENT care model. A geriatric emergency nurse conducted CGA and interdisciplinary care planning among older patients identified as at risk for adverse events (e.g. unplanned ED readmission, functional decline) with the interRAI ED Screener© and clinical judgement of ED staff. Case manager follow-up was offered to at risk patients without hospitalization after index ED visit. For inpatients, geriatric follow-up was guaranteed on an acute geriatric ward or by the inpatient geriatric consultation team on a non-geriatric ward if considered necessary. Primary outcome was unplanned 90-day ED readmission. Secondary outcomes were ED length of stay (LOS), hospitalization rate, in-hospital LOS, 90-day higher level of care, 90-day functional decline and 90-day post-hospitalization mortality. RESULTS: Almost half of intervention patients (404/886 = 45.6%) were categorized at risk. These received on average seven advices. Adherence rate to advices on the ED, during hospitalization and in community care was 86.1, 74.6 and 34.1%, respectively. One out of four at risk patients without hospitalization after index ED visit accepted case manager follow-up. Unplanned ED readmission occurred in 170 of 768 (22.1%) control patients and in 205 of 857 (23.9%) intervention patients (p = .11). The intervention group had shorter ED LOS (12.7 h versus 19.1 h in the control group; p < .001), but higher rate of hospitalization (70.0% versus 67.0% in the control group; p = .003). CONCLUSIONS: The URGENT care model shortened ED LOS and increased the hospitalization rate, but did not prevent unplanned ED readmissions. A geriatric emergency nurse could improve in-hospital patient management, but failed to introduce substantial out-hospital case-management. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol of this study was registered retrospectively with ISRCTN (ISRCTN91449949; registered 20 June 2017). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12877-019-1233-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6686568/ /pubmed/31390994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1233-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Heeren, Pieter
Devriendt, Els
Fieuws, Steffen
Wellens, Nathalie I. H.
Deschodt, Mieke
Flamaing, Johan
Sabbe, Marc
Milisen, Koen
Unplanned readmission prevention by a geriatric emergency network for transitional care (URGENT): a prospective before-after study
title Unplanned readmission prevention by a geriatric emergency network for transitional care (URGENT): a prospective before-after study
title_full Unplanned readmission prevention by a geriatric emergency network for transitional care (URGENT): a prospective before-after study
title_fullStr Unplanned readmission prevention by a geriatric emergency network for transitional care (URGENT): a prospective before-after study
title_full_unstemmed Unplanned readmission prevention by a geriatric emergency network for transitional care (URGENT): a prospective before-after study
title_short Unplanned readmission prevention by a geriatric emergency network for transitional care (URGENT): a prospective before-after study
title_sort unplanned readmission prevention by a geriatric emergency network for transitional care (urgent): a prospective before-after study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6686568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31390994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1233-9
work_keys_str_mv AT heerenpieter unplannedreadmissionpreventionbyageriatricemergencynetworkfortransitionalcareurgentaprospectivebeforeafterstudy
AT devriendtels unplannedreadmissionpreventionbyageriatricemergencynetworkfortransitionalcareurgentaprospectivebeforeafterstudy
AT fieuwssteffen unplannedreadmissionpreventionbyageriatricemergencynetworkfortransitionalcareurgentaprospectivebeforeafterstudy
AT wellensnathalieih unplannedreadmissionpreventionbyageriatricemergencynetworkfortransitionalcareurgentaprospectivebeforeafterstudy
AT deschodtmieke unplannedreadmissionpreventionbyageriatricemergencynetworkfortransitionalcareurgentaprospectivebeforeafterstudy
AT flamaingjohan unplannedreadmissionpreventionbyageriatricemergencynetworkfortransitionalcareurgentaprospectivebeforeafterstudy
AT sabbemarc unplannedreadmissionpreventionbyageriatricemergencynetworkfortransitionalcareurgentaprospectivebeforeafterstudy
AT milisenkoen unplannedreadmissionpreventionbyageriatricemergencynetworkfortransitionalcareurgentaprospectivebeforeafterstudy