Cargando…

Microbiome-driven identification of microbial indicators for postharvest diseases of sugar beets

BACKGROUND: Sugar loss due to storage rot has a substantial economic impact on the sugar industry. The gradual spread of saprophytic fungi such as Fusarium and Penicillium spp. during storage in beet clamps is an ongoing challenge for postharvest processing. Early detection of shifts in microbial co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kusstatscher, Peter, Zachow, Christin, Harms, Karsten, Maier, Johann, Eigner, Herbert, Berg, Gabriele, Cernava, Tomislav
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6686572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31391094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-019-0728-0
_version_ 1783442597952356352
author Kusstatscher, Peter
Zachow, Christin
Harms, Karsten
Maier, Johann
Eigner, Herbert
Berg, Gabriele
Cernava, Tomislav
author_facet Kusstatscher, Peter
Zachow, Christin
Harms, Karsten
Maier, Johann
Eigner, Herbert
Berg, Gabriele
Cernava, Tomislav
author_sort Kusstatscher, Peter
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sugar loss due to storage rot has a substantial economic impact on the sugar industry. The gradual spread of saprophytic fungi such as Fusarium and Penicillium spp. during storage in beet clamps is an ongoing challenge for postharvest processing. Early detection of shifts in microbial communities in beet clamps is a promising approach for the initiation of targeted countermeasures during developing storage rot. In a combined approach, high-throughput sequencing of bacterial and fungal genetic markers was complemented with cultivation-dependent methods and provided detailed insights into microbial communities colonizing stored roots. These data were used to develop a multi-target qPCR technique for early detection of postharvest diseases. RESULTS: The comparison of beet microbiomes from six clamps in Austria and Germany highlighted regional differences; nevertheless, universal indicators of the health status were identified. Apart from a significant decrease in microbial diversity in decaying sugar beets (p ≤ 0.01), a distinctive shift in the taxonomic composition of the overall microbiome was found. Fungal taxa such as Candida and Penicillium together with the gram-positive Lactobacillus were the main disease indicators in the microbiome of decaying sugar beets. In contrast, the genera Plectosphaerella and Vishniacozyma as well as a higher microbial diversity in general were found to reflect the microbiome of healthy beets. Based on these findings, a qPCR-based early detection technique was developed and confirmed a twofold decrease of health indicators and an up to 10,000-fold increase of disease indicators in beet clamps. This was further verified with analyses of the sugar content in storage samples. CONCLUSION: By conducting a detailed assessment of temporal microbiome changes during the storage of sugar beets, distinct indicator species were identified that reflect progressing rot and losses in sugar content. The insights generated in this study provide a novel basis to improve current or develop next-generation postharvest management techniques by tracking disease indicators during storage. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40168-019-0728-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6686572
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66865722019-08-12 Microbiome-driven identification of microbial indicators for postharvest diseases of sugar beets Kusstatscher, Peter Zachow, Christin Harms, Karsten Maier, Johann Eigner, Herbert Berg, Gabriele Cernava, Tomislav Microbiome Research BACKGROUND: Sugar loss due to storage rot has a substantial economic impact on the sugar industry. The gradual spread of saprophytic fungi such as Fusarium and Penicillium spp. during storage in beet clamps is an ongoing challenge for postharvest processing. Early detection of shifts in microbial communities in beet clamps is a promising approach for the initiation of targeted countermeasures during developing storage rot. In a combined approach, high-throughput sequencing of bacterial and fungal genetic markers was complemented with cultivation-dependent methods and provided detailed insights into microbial communities colonizing stored roots. These data were used to develop a multi-target qPCR technique for early detection of postharvest diseases. RESULTS: The comparison of beet microbiomes from six clamps in Austria and Germany highlighted regional differences; nevertheless, universal indicators of the health status were identified. Apart from a significant decrease in microbial diversity in decaying sugar beets (p ≤ 0.01), a distinctive shift in the taxonomic composition of the overall microbiome was found. Fungal taxa such as Candida and Penicillium together with the gram-positive Lactobacillus were the main disease indicators in the microbiome of decaying sugar beets. In contrast, the genera Plectosphaerella and Vishniacozyma as well as a higher microbial diversity in general were found to reflect the microbiome of healthy beets. Based on these findings, a qPCR-based early detection technique was developed and confirmed a twofold decrease of health indicators and an up to 10,000-fold increase of disease indicators in beet clamps. This was further verified with analyses of the sugar content in storage samples. CONCLUSION: By conducting a detailed assessment of temporal microbiome changes during the storage of sugar beets, distinct indicator species were identified that reflect progressing rot and losses in sugar content. The insights generated in this study provide a novel basis to improve current or develop next-generation postharvest management techniques by tracking disease indicators during storage. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40168-019-0728-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6686572/ /pubmed/31391094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-019-0728-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Kusstatscher, Peter
Zachow, Christin
Harms, Karsten
Maier, Johann
Eigner, Herbert
Berg, Gabriele
Cernava, Tomislav
Microbiome-driven identification of microbial indicators for postharvest diseases of sugar beets
title Microbiome-driven identification of microbial indicators for postharvest diseases of sugar beets
title_full Microbiome-driven identification of microbial indicators for postharvest diseases of sugar beets
title_fullStr Microbiome-driven identification of microbial indicators for postharvest diseases of sugar beets
title_full_unstemmed Microbiome-driven identification of microbial indicators for postharvest diseases of sugar beets
title_short Microbiome-driven identification of microbial indicators for postharvest diseases of sugar beets
title_sort microbiome-driven identification of microbial indicators for postharvest diseases of sugar beets
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6686572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31391094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-019-0728-0
work_keys_str_mv AT kusstatscherpeter microbiomedrivenidentificationofmicrobialindicatorsforpostharvestdiseasesofsugarbeets
AT zachowchristin microbiomedrivenidentificationofmicrobialindicatorsforpostharvestdiseasesofsugarbeets
AT harmskarsten microbiomedrivenidentificationofmicrobialindicatorsforpostharvestdiseasesofsugarbeets
AT maierjohann microbiomedrivenidentificationofmicrobialindicatorsforpostharvestdiseasesofsugarbeets
AT eignerherbert microbiomedrivenidentificationofmicrobialindicatorsforpostharvestdiseasesofsugarbeets
AT berggabriele microbiomedrivenidentificationofmicrobialindicatorsforpostharvestdiseasesofsugarbeets
AT cernavatomislav microbiomedrivenidentificationofmicrobialindicatorsforpostharvestdiseasesofsugarbeets