Cargando…

Implementation evaluation and refinement of an intervention to improve blunt chest injury management—A mixed‐methods study

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To investigate uptake of a Chest Injury Protocol (ChIP), examine factors influencing its implementation and identify interventions for promoting its use. BACKGROUND: Failure to treat blunt chest injuries in a timely manner with sufficient analgesia, physiotherapy and respiratory...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Curtis, Kate, Van, Connie, Lam, Mary, Asha, Stephen, Unsworth, Annalise, Clements, Alana, Atkins, Louise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6686633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28252839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13782
_version_ 1783442607812116480
author Curtis, Kate
Van, Connie
Lam, Mary
Asha, Stephen
Unsworth, Annalise
Clements, Alana
Atkins, Louise
author_facet Curtis, Kate
Van, Connie
Lam, Mary
Asha, Stephen
Unsworth, Annalise
Clements, Alana
Atkins, Louise
author_sort Curtis, Kate
collection PubMed
description AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To investigate uptake of a Chest Injury Protocol (ChIP), examine factors influencing its implementation and identify interventions for promoting its use. BACKGROUND: Failure to treat blunt chest injuries in a timely manner with sufficient analgesia, physiotherapy and respiratory support, can lead to complications such as pneumonia and respiratory failure and/or death. DESIGN: This is a mixed‐methods implementation evaluation study. METHODS: Two methods were used: (i) identification and review of the characteristics of all patients eligible for the ChIP protocol, and (ii) survey of hospital staff opinions mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation. The characteristics and treatment received between the groups were compared using the chi‐square test or Fischer's exact test for proportions, and the Mann–Whitney U‐test for continuous data. Quantitative survey data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data were coded in NVivo 10 using a coding guide based on the TDF and Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW). Identification of interventions to change target behaviours was sourced from the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy Version 1 in consultation with stakeholders. RESULTS: Only 68.4% of eligible patients received ChIP. Fifteen facilitators and 10 barriers were identified to influence the implementation of ChIP in the clinical setting. These themes were mapped to 10 of the 14 TDF domains and corresponded with all nine intervention functions in the BCW. Seven of these intervention functions were selected to address the target behaviours and a multi‐faceted relaunch of the revised protocol developed. Following re‐launch, uptake increased to 91%. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated how the BCW may be used to revise and improve a clinical protocol in the ED context. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Newly implemented clinical protocols should incorporate clinician behaviour change assessment, strategy and interventions. Enhancing the self‐efficacy of emergency nurses when performing assessments has the potential to improve patient outcomes and should be included in implementation strategy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6686633
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66866332019-08-14 Implementation evaluation and refinement of an intervention to improve blunt chest injury management—A mixed‐methods study Curtis, Kate Van, Connie Lam, Mary Asha, Stephen Unsworth, Annalise Clements, Alana Atkins, Louise J Clin Nurs Original Articles AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To investigate uptake of a Chest Injury Protocol (ChIP), examine factors influencing its implementation and identify interventions for promoting its use. BACKGROUND: Failure to treat blunt chest injuries in a timely manner with sufficient analgesia, physiotherapy and respiratory support, can lead to complications such as pneumonia and respiratory failure and/or death. DESIGN: This is a mixed‐methods implementation evaluation study. METHODS: Two methods were used: (i) identification and review of the characteristics of all patients eligible for the ChIP protocol, and (ii) survey of hospital staff opinions mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation. The characteristics and treatment received between the groups were compared using the chi‐square test or Fischer's exact test for proportions, and the Mann–Whitney U‐test for continuous data. Quantitative survey data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data were coded in NVivo 10 using a coding guide based on the TDF and Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW). Identification of interventions to change target behaviours was sourced from the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy Version 1 in consultation with stakeholders. RESULTS: Only 68.4% of eligible patients received ChIP. Fifteen facilitators and 10 barriers were identified to influence the implementation of ChIP in the clinical setting. These themes were mapped to 10 of the 14 TDF domains and corresponded with all nine intervention functions in the BCW. Seven of these intervention functions were selected to address the target behaviours and a multi‐faceted relaunch of the revised protocol developed. Following re‐launch, uptake increased to 91%. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated how the BCW may be used to revise and improve a clinical protocol in the ED context. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Newly implemented clinical protocols should incorporate clinician behaviour change assessment, strategy and interventions. Enhancing the self‐efficacy of emergency nurses when performing assessments has the potential to improve patient outcomes and should be included in implementation strategy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-04-18 2017-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6686633/ /pubmed/28252839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13782 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Nursing Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Curtis, Kate
Van, Connie
Lam, Mary
Asha, Stephen
Unsworth, Annalise
Clements, Alana
Atkins, Louise
Implementation evaluation and refinement of an intervention to improve blunt chest injury management—A mixed‐methods study
title Implementation evaluation and refinement of an intervention to improve blunt chest injury management—A mixed‐methods study
title_full Implementation evaluation and refinement of an intervention to improve blunt chest injury management—A mixed‐methods study
title_fullStr Implementation evaluation and refinement of an intervention to improve blunt chest injury management—A mixed‐methods study
title_full_unstemmed Implementation evaluation and refinement of an intervention to improve blunt chest injury management—A mixed‐methods study
title_short Implementation evaluation and refinement of an intervention to improve blunt chest injury management—A mixed‐methods study
title_sort implementation evaluation and refinement of an intervention to improve blunt chest injury management—a mixed‐methods study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6686633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28252839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13782
work_keys_str_mv AT curtiskate implementationevaluationandrefinementofaninterventiontoimprovebluntchestinjurymanagementamixedmethodsstudy
AT vanconnie implementationevaluationandrefinementofaninterventiontoimprovebluntchestinjurymanagementamixedmethodsstudy
AT lammary implementationevaluationandrefinementofaninterventiontoimprovebluntchestinjurymanagementamixedmethodsstudy
AT ashastephen implementationevaluationandrefinementofaninterventiontoimprovebluntchestinjurymanagementamixedmethodsstudy
AT unsworthannalise implementationevaluationandrefinementofaninterventiontoimprovebluntchestinjurymanagementamixedmethodsstudy
AT clementsalana implementationevaluationandrefinementofaninterventiontoimprovebluntchestinjurymanagementamixedmethodsstudy
AT atkinslouise implementationevaluationandrefinementofaninterventiontoimprovebluntchestinjurymanagementamixedmethodsstudy