Cargando…

Impacts of the EU GMO regulatory framework for plant genome editing

New plant breeding technologies, such as genome editing, are enabling new crop varieties to be developed far quicker and with greater precision and scope than achievable using conventional methods. These advances could help farmers address the challenges of climate change, sustainability, and global...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hundleby, Penny A. C., Harwood, Wendy A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6686985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31423300
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fes3.161
_version_ 1783442654545051648
author Hundleby, Penny A. C.
Harwood, Wendy A.
author_facet Hundleby, Penny A. C.
Harwood, Wendy A.
author_sort Hundleby, Penny A. C.
collection PubMed
description New plant breeding technologies, such as genome editing, are enabling new crop varieties to be developed far quicker and with greater precision and scope than achievable using conventional methods. These advances could help farmers address the challenges of climate change, sustainability, and global food security. However, despite their potential, the uptake of these new technologies has been slowed down due to the uncertainty associated with the regulation of genome edited crops. For many European consumers, their view of new breeding technologies is influenced by many factors. Those who have never faced a major food crisis may not sufficiently appreciate the challenges posed by a projected rise of 2 billion in the human population by 2050. In addition, consumers with a regular and plentiful supply of food may not have to consider how their food is produced, or appreciate the challenges EU farmers are already facing to meet future demand. Misleading online articles, questioning the safety and ethics of these “new” biotech foods, can also lead consumers to be reluctant to accept them. Consequently, Europe's mixed view on biotech crops may also be hindering their adoption in countries who have even more to gain from the technology. In this review, we discuss the current data on global and EU GM crop adoption and the potential impact a new wave of crop development may have for agriculture. We reflect on how the EU has viewed GM crops, and we consider the future of both genetic modification (GM) and genome editing (GE) in the EU. We explore lessons learnt from the adoption of GM crops and examine the potential impact the recent decision not to exempt genome edited crops from the EU GMO Directive, will have on EU farmers, scientists, consumers, trading countries, and the rest of the world.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6686985
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66869852019-08-14 Impacts of the EU GMO regulatory framework for plant genome editing Hundleby, Penny A. C. Harwood, Wendy A. Food Energy Secur Reviews New plant breeding technologies, such as genome editing, are enabling new crop varieties to be developed far quicker and with greater precision and scope than achievable using conventional methods. These advances could help farmers address the challenges of climate change, sustainability, and global food security. However, despite their potential, the uptake of these new technologies has been slowed down due to the uncertainty associated with the regulation of genome edited crops. For many European consumers, their view of new breeding technologies is influenced by many factors. Those who have never faced a major food crisis may not sufficiently appreciate the challenges posed by a projected rise of 2 billion in the human population by 2050. In addition, consumers with a regular and plentiful supply of food may not have to consider how their food is produced, or appreciate the challenges EU farmers are already facing to meet future demand. Misleading online articles, questioning the safety and ethics of these “new” biotech foods, can also lead consumers to be reluctant to accept them. Consequently, Europe's mixed view on biotech crops may also be hindering their adoption in countries who have even more to gain from the technology. In this review, we discuss the current data on global and EU GM crop adoption and the potential impact a new wave of crop development may have for agriculture. We reflect on how the EU has viewed GM crops, and we consider the future of both genetic modification (GM) and genome editing (GE) in the EU. We explore lessons learnt from the adoption of GM crops and examine the potential impact the recent decision not to exempt genome edited crops from the EU GMO Directive, will have on EU farmers, scientists, consumers, trading countries, and the rest of the world. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-12-10 2019-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6686985/ /pubmed/31423300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fes3.161 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Food and Energy Security published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. and the Association of Applied Biologists. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Hundleby, Penny A. C.
Harwood, Wendy A.
Impacts of the EU GMO regulatory framework for plant genome editing
title Impacts of the EU GMO regulatory framework for plant genome editing
title_full Impacts of the EU GMO regulatory framework for plant genome editing
title_fullStr Impacts of the EU GMO regulatory framework for plant genome editing
title_full_unstemmed Impacts of the EU GMO regulatory framework for plant genome editing
title_short Impacts of the EU GMO regulatory framework for plant genome editing
title_sort impacts of the eu gmo regulatory framework for plant genome editing
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6686985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31423300
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fes3.161
work_keys_str_mv AT hundlebypennyac impactsoftheeugmoregulatoryframeworkforplantgenomeediting
AT harwoodwendya impactsoftheeugmoregulatoryframeworkforplantgenomeediting