Cargando…
Process evaluations of primary care interventions addressing chronic disease: a systematic review
OBJECTIVE: Process evaluations (PEs) alongside randomised controlled trials of complex interventions are valuable because they address questions of for whom, how and why interventions had an impact. We synthesised the methods used in PEs of primary care interventions, and their main findings on impl...
Autores principales: | Liu, Hueiming, Mohammed, Alim, Shanthosh, Janani, News, Madeline, Laba, Tracey-Lea, Hackett, Maree L, Peiris, David, Jan, Stephen |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6687007/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31391188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025127 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Examining the use of process evaluations of randomised controlled trials of complex interventions addressing chronic disease in primary health care—a systematic review protocol
por: Liu, Hueiming, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
The effectiveness of interventions to reduce the household economic burden of illness and injury: a systematic review
por: Essue, Beverley M, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Community-Based Chronic Disease Prevention and Management for Aboriginal People in New South Wales, Australia: Mixed Methods Evaluation of the 1 Deadly Step Program
por: Peiris, David, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Implementing Kanyini GAP, a pragmatic randomised controlled trial in Australia: findings from a qualitative study
por: Liu, Hueiming, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Costs and effects of interventions targeting frequent presenters to the emergency department: a systematic and narrative review
por: Korczak, Viola, et al.
Publicado: (2019)