Cargando…
High Life Study protocol: a cross-sectional investigation of the influence of apartment building design policy on resident health and well-being
INTRODUCTION: The rapid increase in apartment construction in Australia has raised concerns about the impacts of poorly designed and located buildings on resident health and well-being. While apartment design policies exist, their content varies across jurisdictions and evidence on their impact on h...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6687010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31377707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029220 |
_version_ | 1783442660444340224 |
---|---|
author | Foster, Sarah Maitland, Clover Hooper, Paula Bolleter, Julian Duckworth-Smith, Anthony Giles-Corti, Billie Arundel, Jonathan |
author_facet | Foster, Sarah Maitland, Clover Hooper, Paula Bolleter, Julian Duckworth-Smith, Anthony Giles-Corti, Billie Arundel, Jonathan |
author_sort | Foster, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The rapid increase in apartment construction in Australia has raised concerns about the impacts of poorly designed and located buildings on resident health and well-being. While apartment design policies exist, their content varies across jurisdictions and evidence on their impact on health and well-being is lacking. This cross-sectional observational study (2017–2021) aims to generate empirical evidence to guide policy decisions on apartment development and help to create healthy, equitable higher-density communities. Objectives include to benchmark the implementation of health-promoting apartment design requirements and to identify associations between requirements and resident health and well-being outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Eligible buildings in three Australian cities with different apartment design guidelines will be stratified by area disadvantage and randomly selected (~n=99). Building architects, developers and local governments will be approached to provide endorsed development plans from which apartment and building design features will be extracted. Additional data collection includes a resident survey (~n=1000) to assess environmental stressors and health and well-being impacts and outcomes, and geographic information systems measures of the neighbourhood. The study has 85% power to detect a difference of 0.5 SD in the primary outcome of mental well-being (Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale) at a 5% level of significance. Analyses will compare policy compliance and health-promoting design features between cities and area disadvantage groups. Regression models will test whether higher policy compliance (overall and by design theme) is associated with better health and well-being, and the relative contribution of the neighbourhood context. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Human Research Ethics Committees of RMIT University (CHEAN B 21146-10/17) and the University of Western Australia (RA/4/1/8735) approved the study protocol. In addition to academic publications, the collaboration will develop specific health-promoting indicators to embed into the monitoring of apartment design policy implementation and impact, and co-design research dissemination materials to facilitate uptake by decision makers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6687010 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66870102019-08-23 High Life Study protocol: a cross-sectional investigation of the influence of apartment building design policy on resident health and well-being Foster, Sarah Maitland, Clover Hooper, Paula Bolleter, Julian Duckworth-Smith, Anthony Giles-Corti, Billie Arundel, Jonathan BMJ Open Public Health INTRODUCTION: The rapid increase in apartment construction in Australia has raised concerns about the impacts of poorly designed and located buildings on resident health and well-being. While apartment design policies exist, their content varies across jurisdictions and evidence on their impact on health and well-being is lacking. This cross-sectional observational study (2017–2021) aims to generate empirical evidence to guide policy decisions on apartment development and help to create healthy, equitable higher-density communities. Objectives include to benchmark the implementation of health-promoting apartment design requirements and to identify associations between requirements and resident health and well-being outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Eligible buildings in three Australian cities with different apartment design guidelines will be stratified by area disadvantage and randomly selected (~n=99). Building architects, developers and local governments will be approached to provide endorsed development plans from which apartment and building design features will be extracted. Additional data collection includes a resident survey (~n=1000) to assess environmental stressors and health and well-being impacts and outcomes, and geographic information systems measures of the neighbourhood. The study has 85% power to detect a difference of 0.5 SD in the primary outcome of mental well-being (Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale) at a 5% level of significance. Analyses will compare policy compliance and health-promoting design features between cities and area disadvantage groups. Regression models will test whether higher policy compliance (overall and by design theme) is associated with better health and well-being, and the relative contribution of the neighbourhood context. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Human Research Ethics Committees of RMIT University (CHEAN B 21146-10/17) and the University of Western Australia (RA/4/1/8735) approved the study protocol. In addition to academic publications, the collaboration will develop specific health-promoting indicators to embed into the monitoring of apartment design policy implementation and impact, and co-design research dissemination materials to facilitate uptake by decision makers. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6687010/ /pubmed/31377707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029220 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Foster, Sarah Maitland, Clover Hooper, Paula Bolleter, Julian Duckworth-Smith, Anthony Giles-Corti, Billie Arundel, Jonathan High Life Study protocol: a cross-sectional investigation of the influence of apartment building design policy on resident health and well-being |
title | High Life Study protocol: a cross-sectional investigation of the influence of apartment building design policy on resident health and well-being |
title_full | High Life Study protocol: a cross-sectional investigation of the influence of apartment building design policy on resident health and well-being |
title_fullStr | High Life Study protocol: a cross-sectional investigation of the influence of apartment building design policy on resident health and well-being |
title_full_unstemmed | High Life Study protocol: a cross-sectional investigation of the influence of apartment building design policy on resident health and well-being |
title_short | High Life Study protocol: a cross-sectional investigation of the influence of apartment building design policy on resident health and well-being |
title_sort | high life study protocol: a cross-sectional investigation of the influence of apartment building design policy on resident health and well-being |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6687010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31377707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029220 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fostersarah highlifestudyprotocolacrosssectionalinvestigationoftheinfluenceofapartmentbuildingdesignpolicyonresidenthealthandwellbeing AT maitlandclover highlifestudyprotocolacrosssectionalinvestigationoftheinfluenceofapartmentbuildingdesignpolicyonresidenthealthandwellbeing AT hooperpaula highlifestudyprotocolacrosssectionalinvestigationoftheinfluenceofapartmentbuildingdesignpolicyonresidenthealthandwellbeing AT bolleterjulian highlifestudyprotocolacrosssectionalinvestigationoftheinfluenceofapartmentbuildingdesignpolicyonresidenthealthandwellbeing AT duckworthsmithanthony highlifestudyprotocolacrosssectionalinvestigationoftheinfluenceofapartmentbuildingdesignpolicyonresidenthealthandwellbeing AT gilescortibillie highlifestudyprotocolacrosssectionalinvestigationoftheinfluenceofapartmentbuildingdesignpolicyonresidenthealthandwellbeing AT arundeljonathan highlifestudyprotocolacrosssectionalinvestigationoftheinfluenceofapartmentbuildingdesignpolicyonresidenthealthandwellbeing |