Cargando…

High Life Study protocol: a cross-sectional investigation of the influence of apartment building design policy on resident health and well-being

INTRODUCTION: The rapid increase in apartment construction in Australia has raised concerns about the impacts of poorly designed and located buildings on resident health and well-being. While apartment design policies exist, their content varies across jurisdictions and evidence on their impact on h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foster, Sarah, Maitland, Clover, Hooper, Paula, Bolleter, Julian, Duckworth-Smith, Anthony, Giles-Corti, Billie, Arundel, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6687010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31377707
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029220
_version_ 1783442660444340224
author Foster, Sarah
Maitland, Clover
Hooper, Paula
Bolleter, Julian
Duckworth-Smith, Anthony
Giles-Corti, Billie
Arundel, Jonathan
author_facet Foster, Sarah
Maitland, Clover
Hooper, Paula
Bolleter, Julian
Duckworth-Smith, Anthony
Giles-Corti, Billie
Arundel, Jonathan
author_sort Foster, Sarah
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The rapid increase in apartment construction in Australia has raised concerns about the impacts of poorly designed and located buildings on resident health and well-being. While apartment design policies exist, their content varies across jurisdictions and evidence on their impact on health and well-being is lacking. This cross-sectional observational study (2017–2021) aims to generate empirical evidence to guide policy decisions on apartment development and help to create healthy, equitable higher-density communities. Objectives include to benchmark the implementation of health-promoting apartment design requirements and to identify associations between requirements and resident health and well-being outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Eligible buildings in three Australian cities with different apartment design guidelines will be stratified by area disadvantage and randomly selected (~n=99). Building architects, developers and local governments will be approached to provide endorsed development plans from which apartment and building design features will be extracted. Additional data collection includes a resident survey (~n=1000) to assess environmental stressors and health and well-being impacts and outcomes, and geographic information systems measures of the neighbourhood. The study has 85% power to detect a difference of 0.5 SD in the primary outcome of mental well-being (Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale) at a 5% level of significance. Analyses will compare policy compliance and health-promoting design features between cities and area disadvantage groups. Regression models will test whether higher policy compliance (overall and by design theme) is associated with better health and well-being, and the relative contribution of the neighbourhood context. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Human Research Ethics Committees of RMIT University (CHEAN B 21146-10/17) and the University of Western Australia (RA/4/1/8735) approved the study protocol. In addition to academic publications, the collaboration will develop specific health-promoting indicators to embed into the monitoring of apartment design policy implementation and impact, and co-design research dissemination materials to facilitate uptake by decision makers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6687010
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66870102019-08-23 High Life Study protocol: a cross-sectional investigation of the influence of apartment building design policy on resident health and well-being Foster, Sarah Maitland, Clover Hooper, Paula Bolleter, Julian Duckworth-Smith, Anthony Giles-Corti, Billie Arundel, Jonathan BMJ Open Public Health INTRODUCTION: The rapid increase in apartment construction in Australia has raised concerns about the impacts of poorly designed and located buildings on resident health and well-being. While apartment design policies exist, their content varies across jurisdictions and evidence on their impact on health and well-being is lacking. This cross-sectional observational study (2017–2021) aims to generate empirical evidence to guide policy decisions on apartment development and help to create healthy, equitable higher-density communities. Objectives include to benchmark the implementation of health-promoting apartment design requirements and to identify associations between requirements and resident health and well-being outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Eligible buildings in three Australian cities with different apartment design guidelines will be stratified by area disadvantage and randomly selected (~n=99). Building architects, developers and local governments will be approached to provide endorsed development plans from which apartment and building design features will be extracted. Additional data collection includes a resident survey (~n=1000) to assess environmental stressors and health and well-being impacts and outcomes, and geographic information systems measures of the neighbourhood. The study has 85% power to detect a difference of 0.5 SD in the primary outcome of mental well-being (Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale) at a 5% level of significance. Analyses will compare policy compliance and health-promoting design features between cities and area disadvantage groups. Regression models will test whether higher policy compliance (overall and by design theme) is associated with better health and well-being, and the relative contribution of the neighbourhood context. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Human Research Ethics Committees of RMIT University (CHEAN B 21146-10/17) and the University of Western Australia (RA/4/1/8735) approved the study protocol. In addition to academic publications, the collaboration will develop specific health-promoting indicators to embed into the monitoring of apartment design policy implementation and impact, and co-design research dissemination materials to facilitate uptake by decision makers. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6687010/ /pubmed/31377707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029220 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Public Health
Foster, Sarah
Maitland, Clover
Hooper, Paula
Bolleter, Julian
Duckworth-Smith, Anthony
Giles-Corti, Billie
Arundel, Jonathan
High Life Study protocol: a cross-sectional investigation of the influence of apartment building design policy on resident health and well-being
title High Life Study protocol: a cross-sectional investigation of the influence of apartment building design policy on resident health and well-being
title_full High Life Study protocol: a cross-sectional investigation of the influence of apartment building design policy on resident health and well-being
title_fullStr High Life Study protocol: a cross-sectional investigation of the influence of apartment building design policy on resident health and well-being
title_full_unstemmed High Life Study protocol: a cross-sectional investigation of the influence of apartment building design policy on resident health and well-being
title_short High Life Study protocol: a cross-sectional investigation of the influence of apartment building design policy on resident health and well-being
title_sort high life study protocol: a cross-sectional investigation of the influence of apartment building design policy on resident health and well-being
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6687010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31377707
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029220
work_keys_str_mv AT fostersarah highlifestudyprotocolacrosssectionalinvestigationoftheinfluenceofapartmentbuildingdesignpolicyonresidenthealthandwellbeing
AT maitlandclover highlifestudyprotocolacrosssectionalinvestigationoftheinfluenceofapartmentbuildingdesignpolicyonresidenthealthandwellbeing
AT hooperpaula highlifestudyprotocolacrosssectionalinvestigationoftheinfluenceofapartmentbuildingdesignpolicyonresidenthealthandwellbeing
AT bolleterjulian highlifestudyprotocolacrosssectionalinvestigationoftheinfluenceofapartmentbuildingdesignpolicyonresidenthealthandwellbeing
AT duckworthsmithanthony highlifestudyprotocolacrosssectionalinvestigationoftheinfluenceofapartmentbuildingdesignpolicyonresidenthealthandwellbeing
AT gilescortibillie highlifestudyprotocolacrosssectionalinvestigationoftheinfluenceofapartmentbuildingdesignpolicyonresidenthealthandwellbeing
AT arundeljonathan highlifestudyprotocolacrosssectionalinvestigationoftheinfluenceofapartmentbuildingdesignpolicyonresidenthealthandwellbeing