Cargando…

Process evaluation of team-based care in people aged >65 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is increasing globally and there is critical need develop interventions to improve health outcomes among older people. The Group Appointments in Primary Care (GAP) study was a randomised controlled trial designed to test the efficacy of a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sims Gould, Joanie, Tong, Catherine, Ly, Jessica, Vazirian, Sara, Windt, Adriaan, Khan, Karim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6687023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31377711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029965
_version_ 1783442663651934208
author Sims Gould, Joanie
Tong, Catherine
Ly, Jessica
Vazirian, Sara
Windt, Adriaan
Khan, Karim
author_facet Sims Gould, Joanie
Tong, Catherine
Ly, Jessica
Vazirian, Sara
Windt, Adriaan
Khan, Karim
author_sort Sims Gould, Joanie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is increasing globally and there is critical need develop interventions to improve health outcomes among older people. The Group Appointments in Primary Care (GAP) study was a randomised controlled trial designed to test the efficacy of a group and team-based medical visit programme to lower haemoglobin A1c among patients with T2DM. We aimed to understand the barriers and facilitators to implement the GAP intervention within a primary care setting, with an emphasis on patient experience. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a qualitative exploratory study. Data were gathered from semistructured interviews conducted with the first cohort of GAP study participants (n=15) at baseline and intervention completion. GAP participants were aged >65, diagnosed with T2DM and from one primary care clinic. The interview questions identified the patient perspectives and factors relating to their attendance at seven group medical visits that were part of the intervention programme. Data were analysed using framework analysis. RESULTS: We identified four themes that captured participants’ experiences: (1) Education: learning with professionals, learning with one another; (2) Social Support: common interests, common problems; (3) Setting: ease of location, ease of conversation and (4) Impact: expectations met, empowerment gained. The GAP intervention increased participants’ self-reported diabetes literacy and self-management skills. CONCLUSIONS: We learnt that: accessible community centres, not primary care offices, were the ideal location for GAP; the consistent leadership of the primary care physician was valued by participants; and, the content related to exercise and healthy diet were viewed as impactful. Also, learning was achieved through content delivered by clinical experts, and by T2DM experts with lived experience—the GAP peers. Our findings highlight the important role of group learning. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02002143
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6687023
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66870232019-08-23 Process evaluation of team-based care in people aged >65 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus Sims Gould, Joanie Tong, Catherine Ly, Jessica Vazirian, Sara Windt, Adriaan Khan, Karim BMJ Open Diabetes and Endocrinology OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is increasing globally and there is critical need develop interventions to improve health outcomes among older people. The Group Appointments in Primary Care (GAP) study was a randomised controlled trial designed to test the efficacy of a group and team-based medical visit programme to lower haemoglobin A1c among patients with T2DM. We aimed to understand the barriers and facilitators to implement the GAP intervention within a primary care setting, with an emphasis on patient experience. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a qualitative exploratory study. Data were gathered from semistructured interviews conducted with the first cohort of GAP study participants (n=15) at baseline and intervention completion. GAP participants were aged >65, diagnosed with T2DM and from one primary care clinic. The interview questions identified the patient perspectives and factors relating to their attendance at seven group medical visits that were part of the intervention programme. Data were analysed using framework analysis. RESULTS: We identified four themes that captured participants’ experiences: (1) Education: learning with professionals, learning with one another; (2) Social Support: common interests, common problems; (3) Setting: ease of location, ease of conversation and (4) Impact: expectations met, empowerment gained. The GAP intervention increased participants’ self-reported diabetes literacy and self-management skills. CONCLUSIONS: We learnt that: accessible community centres, not primary care offices, were the ideal location for GAP; the consistent leadership of the primary care physician was valued by participants; and, the content related to exercise and healthy diet were viewed as impactful. Also, learning was achieved through content delivered by clinical experts, and by T2DM experts with lived experience—the GAP peers. Our findings highlight the important role of group learning. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02002143 BMJ Publishing Group 2019-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6687023/ /pubmed/31377711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029965 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Diabetes and Endocrinology
Sims Gould, Joanie
Tong, Catherine
Ly, Jessica
Vazirian, Sara
Windt, Adriaan
Khan, Karim
Process evaluation of team-based care in people aged >65 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus
title Process evaluation of team-based care in people aged >65 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_full Process evaluation of team-based care in people aged >65 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_fullStr Process evaluation of team-based care in people aged >65 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_full_unstemmed Process evaluation of team-based care in people aged >65 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_short Process evaluation of team-based care in people aged >65 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus
title_sort process evaluation of team-based care in people aged >65 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus
topic Diabetes and Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6687023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31377711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029965
work_keys_str_mv AT simsgouldjoanie processevaluationofteambasedcareinpeopleaged65yearswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT tongcatherine processevaluationofteambasedcareinpeopleaged65yearswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT lyjessica processevaluationofteambasedcareinpeopleaged65yearswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT vaziriansara processevaluationofteambasedcareinpeopleaged65yearswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT windtadriaan processevaluationofteambasedcareinpeopleaged65yearswithtype2diabetesmellitus
AT khankarim processevaluationofteambasedcareinpeopleaged65yearswithtype2diabetesmellitus