Cargando…

Performance evaluation of three rapid antigen tests for the diagnosis of group A Streptococci

OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic performance of three rapid antigen detection tests (RADTs) for group A Streptococcus (GAS). DESIGN: A hospital-based, cross-sectional, retrospective study. SETTING: A comparative study of rapid diagnostic tests for GAS using clinical specimens in a single institu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Ha-Nui, Kim, Jeeyong, Jang, Woong Sik, Nam, Jeonghun, Lim, Chae Seung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6687028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31383693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025438
_version_ 1783442664893448192
author Kim, Ha-Nui
Kim, Jeeyong
Jang, Woong Sik
Nam, Jeonghun
Lim, Chae Seung
author_facet Kim, Ha-Nui
Kim, Jeeyong
Jang, Woong Sik
Nam, Jeonghun
Lim, Chae Seung
author_sort Kim, Ha-Nui
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic performance of three rapid antigen detection tests (RADTs) for group A Streptococcus (GAS). DESIGN: A hospital-based, cross-sectional, retrospective study. SETTING: A comparative study of rapid diagnostic tests for GAS using clinical specimens in a single institute. PARTICIPANTS: 225 children in the outpatient clinics ofKorea University Guro Hospitalwith suspicious symptoms were subjected to throat swab sampling. A dual-swab applicator was used. Samples were stored at below −70°C in a 10 mL transport tube containing 1 mL liquid Stuart’s transport medium. OUTCOME MEASURES: All tests were performed in the laboratory by trained clinical laboratory scientists. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and kappa index of three RADTs were compared with the reference PCR test and culture results. RESULTS: Of the 225 patients suspected of having GAS, 67 and 90 were positive for GAS in the culture and PCR tests, respectively. Compared with the reference culture, the sensitivity for GAS was 92.5% (CI 83.4 to 97.5), 71.6% (CI 59.3 to 81.9) and 74.63% (CI 62.5 to 84.4) for careUS Strep A Plus, SD Bioline and BD Veritor, respectively, and the specificity was 97.0% (CI 93.1 to 99.0), 94.6% (CI 90.1 to 97.5) and 92.9% (CI 87.8 to 96.2) for careUS Strep A Plus, SD Bioline and BD Veritor, respectively. Compared with the reference GAS real-time PCR, the sensitivity was 73.3% (CI 62.9 to 82.1), 63.3% (CI 52.5 to 73.2) and 67.8% (CI 57.1 to 77.2) for careUS Strep A Plus, SD Bioline and BD Veritor, respectively, and the specificity was 99.3% (CI 95.9 to 99.9), 100.0% (CI 97.3 to 100.0) and 99.3% (CI 95.9 to 99.9) for careUS Strep A Plus, SD Bioline and BD Veritor, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The careUS Strep A Plus is a useful test that showed highly comparable results with those of the culture test and superior performances among the three RADTs. The use of RADTs should be encouraged to provide acceptable and fast results using simple equipment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6687028
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66870282019-08-23 Performance evaluation of three rapid antigen tests for the diagnosis of group A Streptococci Kim, Ha-Nui Kim, Jeeyong Jang, Woong Sik Nam, Jeonghun Lim, Chae Seung BMJ Open Diagnostics OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic performance of three rapid antigen detection tests (RADTs) for group A Streptococcus (GAS). DESIGN: A hospital-based, cross-sectional, retrospective study. SETTING: A comparative study of rapid diagnostic tests for GAS using clinical specimens in a single institute. PARTICIPANTS: 225 children in the outpatient clinics ofKorea University Guro Hospitalwith suspicious symptoms were subjected to throat swab sampling. A dual-swab applicator was used. Samples were stored at below −70°C in a 10 mL transport tube containing 1 mL liquid Stuart’s transport medium. OUTCOME MEASURES: All tests were performed in the laboratory by trained clinical laboratory scientists. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and kappa index of three RADTs were compared with the reference PCR test and culture results. RESULTS: Of the 225 patients suspected of having GAS, 67 and 90 were positive for GAS in the culture and PCR tests, respectively. Compared with the reference culture, the sensitivity for GAS was 92.5% (CI 83.4 to 97.5), 71.6% (CI 59.3 to 81.9) and 74.63% (CI 62.5 to 84.4) for careUS Strep A Plus, SD Bioline and BD Veritor, respectively, and the specificity was 97.0% (CI 93.1 to 99.0), 94.6% (CI 90.1 to 97.5) and 92.9% (CI 87.8 to 96.2) for careUS Strep A Plus, SD Bioline and BD Veritor, respectively. Compared with the reference GAS real-time PCR, the sensitivity was 73.3% (CI 62.9 to 82.1), 63.3% (CI 52.5 to 73.2) and 67.8% (CI 57.1 to 77.2) for careUS Strep A Plus, SD Bioline and BD Veritor, respectively, and the specificity was 99.3% (CI 95.9 to 99.9), 100.0% (CI 97.3 to 100.0) and 99.3% (CI 95.9 to 99.9) for careUS Strep A Plus, SD Bioline and BD Veritor, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The careUS Strep A Plus is a useful test that showed highly comparable results with those of the culture test and superior performances among the three RADTs. The use of RADTs should be encouraged to provide acceptable and fast results using simple equipment. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6687028/ /pubmed/31383693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025438 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Diagnostics
Kim, Ha-Nui
Kim, Jeeyong
Jang, Woong Sik
Nam, Jeonghun
Lim, Chae Seung
Performance evaluation of three rapid antigen tests for the diagnosis of group A Streptococci
title Performance evaluation of three rapid antigen tests for the diagnosis of group A Streptococci
title_full Performance evaluation of three rapid antigen tests for the diagnosis of group A Streptococci
title_fullStr Performance evaluation of three rapid antigen tests for the diagnosis of group A Streptococci
title_full_unstemmed Performance evaluation of three rapid antigen tests for the diagnosis of group A Streptococci
title_short Performance evaluation of three rapid antigen tests for the diagnosis of group A Streptococci
title_sort performance evaluation of three rapid antigen tests for the diagnosis of group a streptococci
topic Diagnostics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6687028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31383693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025438
work_keys_str_mv AT kimhanui performanceevaluationofthreerapidantigentestsforthediagnosisofgroupastreptococci
AT kimjeeyong performanceevaluationofthreerapidantigentestsforthediagnosisofgroupastreptococci
AT jangwoongsik performanceevaluationofthreerapidantigentestsforthediagnosisofgroupastreptococci
AT namjeonghun performanceevaluationofthreerapidantigentestsforthediagnosisofgroupastreptococci
AT limchaeseung performanceevaluationofthreerapidantigentestsforthediagnosisofgroupastreptococci