Cargando…

Cost analysis of day care centres in Norway

BACKGROUND: Day care services aim to offer meaningful activities and a safe environment for the attendees and a respite for family caregivers while being cost effective. This study compares the use of formal and informal care in users and non-users of day care centres designed for persons with demen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vossius, C., Selbæk, G., Benth, J. Šaltytė, Wimo, A., Engedal, K., Kirkevold, Ø., Rokstad, A. M. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6687148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31393890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219568
_version_ 1783442686738432000
author Vossius, C.
Selbæk, G.
Benth, J. Šaltytė
Wimo, A.
Engedal, K.
Kirkevold, Ø.
Rokstad, A. M. M.
author_facet Vossius, C.
Selbæk, G.
Benth, J. Šaltytė
Wimo, A.
Engedal, K.
Kirkevold, Ø.
Rokstad, A. M. M.
author_sort Vossius, C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Day care services aim to offer meaningful activities and a safe environment for the attendees and a respite for family caregivers while being cost effective. This study compares the use of formal and informal care in users and non-users of day care centres designed for persons with dementia. METHOD: Users of day care designed for dementia (DC group) and non-users (NDC group) were followed over a period of 24 months or until nursing home admission (NHA) respectively death. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected at baseline and after 12 and 24 months. The use of care was recorded by Resource Utilization in Dementia (RUD). RESULTS: A total of 257 persons with dementia participated in the study, 181 in the DC group and 76 in the NDC group. Users of day care centres cause higher costs due to the expenses for day care, while neither the use of home nursing, secondary care, informal care nor the time until NHA did show any differences between users and non-users. The overall costs were higher in the DC group at baseline and after 12 months, but this difference was no longer present at the end of the two-year study period. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate no potential cost-saving effect of day care designed for people with dementia, as the use of day care did neither result in a reduced use of care nor in a delay of NHA. Future research should balance the non-monetary benefits of day care against its costs for a full cost-effectiveness analysis, most favourable in a RCT-design.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6687148
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66871482019-08-15 Cost analysis of day care centres in Norway Vossius, C. Selbæk, G. Benth, J. Šaltytė Wimo, A. Engedal, K. Kirkevold, Ø. Rokstad, A. M. M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Day care services aim to offer meaningful activities and a safe environment for the attendees and a respite for family caregivers while being cost effective. This study compares the use of formal and informal care in users and non-users of day care centres designed for persons with dementia. METHOD: Users of day care designed for dementia (DC group) and non-users (NDC group) were followed over a period of 24 months or until nursing home admission (NHA) respectively death. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected at baseline and after 12 and 24 months. The use of care was recorded by Resource Utilization in Dementia (RUD). RESULTS: A total of 257 persons with dementia participated in the study, 181 in the DC group and 76 in the NDC group. Users of day care centres cause higher costs due to the expenses for day care, while neither the use of home nursing, secondary care, informal care nor the time until NHA did show any differences between users and non-users. The overall costs were higher in the DC group at baseline and after 12 months, but this difference was no longer present at the end of the two-year study period. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate no potential cost-saving effect of day care designed for people with dementia, as the use of day care did neither result in a reduced use of care nor in a delay of NHA. Future research should balance the non-monetary benefits of day care against its costs for a full cost-effectiveness analysis, most favourable in a RCT-design. Public Library of Science 2019-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6687148/ /pubmed/31393890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219568 Text en © 2019 Vossius et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vossius, C.
Selbæk, G.
Benth, J. Šaltytė
Wimo, A.
Engedal, K.
Kirkevold, Ø.
Rokstad, A. M. M.
Cost analysis of day care centres in Norway
title Cost analysis of day care centres in Norway
title_full Cost analysis of day care centres in Norway
title_fullStr Cost analysis of day care centres in Norway
title_full_unstemmed Cost analysis of day care centres in Norway
title_short Cost analysis of day care centres in Norway
title_sort cost analysis of day care centres in norway
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6687148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31393890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219568
work_keys_str_mv AT vossiusc costanalysisofdaycarecentresinnorway
AT selbækg costanalysisofdaycarecentresinnorway
AT benthjsaltyte costanalysisofdaycarecentresinnorway
AT wimoa costanalysisofdaycarecentresinnorway
AT engedalk costanalysisofdaycarecentresinnorway
AT kirkevoldø costanalysisofdaycarecentresinnorway
AT rokstadamm costanalysisofdaycarecentresinnorway