Cargando…

Validity and Reliability of the Wii Balance Board for Static Balance Assessment in Healthy Young Adults

INTRODUCTION: The Wii Balance Board (WBB) is a commonly used tool for balance assessment, however the inconsistency in the reported validity for the WBB when used for the assessment of healthy young adults needs to be clarified. AIM: To investigate the concurrent validity and reliability of the WBB...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaewkaen, Kitchana, Uthama, Suraphong, Ruengsirarak, Worasak, Puntumetakul, Rungthip
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6687213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31447614
http://dx.doi.org/10.21315/mjms2019.26.2.12
_version_ 1783442702056030208
author Kaewkaen, Kitchana
Uthama, Suraphong
Ruengsirarak, Worasak
Puntumetakul, Rungthip
author_facet Kaewkaen, Kitchana
Uthama, Suraphong
Ruengsirarak, Worasak
Puntumetakul, Rungthip
author_sort Kaewkaen, Kitchana
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Wii Balance Board (WBB) is a commonly used tool for balance assessment, however the inconsistency in the reported validity for the WBB when used for the assessment of healthy young adults needs to be clarified. AIM: To investigate the concurrent validity and reliability of the WBB for balance assessment in healthy young adults. METHODS: Thirty-two young adults participated in this study. Their ability to balance was tested while standing on a WBB and a laboratory-grade force platform, under three conditions: feet together with eyes open, feet together with eyes closed and semi-tandem standing with eyes open. They had 10 min resting period between tests. The agreement between the WBB and the laboratory-grade force platform was investigated, and the reliability of the WBB was determined. RESULTS: A poor agreement between the WBB and the laboratory-grade force platform was found for all standing conditions [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.03 to 0.07]. A moderate to high reliability was found for the WBB for balance assessment in healthy young adults (ICC = 0.66 to 0.76). CONCLUSION: The WBB was found to be a reliable tool for static balance assessment in healthy young adults. However, it had poor validity compared to the laboratory-grade force platform.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6687213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66872132019-08-23 Validity and Reliability of the Wii Balance Board for Static Balance Assessment in Healthy Young Adults Kaewkaen, Kitchana Uthama, Suraphong Ruengsirarak, Worasak Puntumetakul, Rungthip Malays J Med Sci Original Article INTRODUCTION: The Wii Balance Board (WBB) is a commonly used tool for balance assessment, however the inconsistency in the reported validity for the WBB when used for the assessment of healthy young adults needs to be clarified. AIM: To investigate the concurrent validity and reliability of the WBB for balance assessment in healthy young adults. METHODS: Thirty-two young adults participated in this study. Their ability to balance was tested while standing on a WBB and a laboratory-grade force platform, under three conditions: feet together with eyes open, feet together with eyes closed and semi-tandem standing with eyes open. They had 10 min resting period between tests. The agreement between the WBB and the laboratory-grade force platform was investigated, and the reliability of the WBB was determined. RESULTS: A poor agreement between the WBB and the laboratory-grade force platform was found for all standing conditions [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.03 to 0.07]. A moderate to high reliability was found for the WBB for balance assessment in healthy young adults (ICC = 0.66 to 0.76). CONCLUSION: The WBB was found to be a reliable tool for static balance assessment in healthy young adults. However, it had poor validity compared to the laboratory-grade force platform. Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia 2019-03 2019-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6687213/ /pubmed/31447614 http://dx.doi.org/10.21315/mjms2019.26.2.12 Text en © Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, 2019 This work is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Kaewkaen, Kitchana
Uthama, Suraphong
Ruengsirarak, Worasak
Puntumetakul, Rungthip
Validity and Reliability of the Wii Balance Board for Static Balance Assessment in Healthy Young Adults
title Validity and Reliability of the Wii Balance Board for Static Balance Assessment in Healthy Young Adults
title_full Validity and Reliability of the Wii Balance Board for Static Balance Assessment in Healthy Young Adults
title_fullStr Validity and Reliability of the Wii Balance Board for Static Balance Assessment in Healthy Young Adults
title_full_unstemmed Validity and Reliability of the Wii Balance Board for Static Balance Assessment in Healthy Young Adults
title_short Validity and Reliability of the Wii Balance Board for Static Balance Assessment in Healthy Young Adults
title_sort validity and reliability of the wii balance board for static balance assessment in healthy young adults
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6687213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31447614
http://dx.doi.org/10.21315/mjms2019.26.2.12
work_keys_str_mv AT kaewkaenkitchana validityandreliabilityofthewiibalanceboardforstaticbalanceassessmentinhealthyyoungadults
AT uthamasuraphong validityandreliabilityofthewiibalanceboardforstaticbalanceassessmentinhealthyyoungadults
AT ruengsirarakworasak validityandreliabilityofthewiibalanceboardforstaticbalanceassessmentinhealthyyoungadults
AT puntumetakulrungthip validityandreliabilityofthewiibalanceboardforstaticbalanceassessmentinhealthyyoungadults