Cargando…

Does Overnight Culture of Cleaved Embryos Improve Pregnancy Rate in Vitrified-Warmed Embryo Transfer Programme?

BACKGROUND: Vitrification is a routine procedure in assisted reproductive technique (ART) lab. However, there is widespread variability between protocols of different centres. The aim of this study was to compare the chemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates between one-day embryo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agha-Rahimi, Azam, Omidi, Marjan, Akyash, Fatemeh, Faramarzi, Azita, Farshchi, Forough Alsadat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6687221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31447608
http://dx.doi.org/10.21315/mjms2019.26.2.6
_version_ 1783442703966535680
author Agha-Rahimi, Azam
Omidi, Marjan
Akyash, Fatemeh
Faramarzi, Azita
Farshchi, Forough Alsadat
author_facet Agha-Rahimi, Azam
Omidi, Marjan
Akyash, Fatemeh
Faramarzi, Azita
Farshchi, Forough Alsadat
author_sort Agha-Rahimi, Azam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vitrification is a routine procedure in assisted reproductive technique (ART) lab. However, there is widespread variability between protocols of different centres. The aim of this study was to compare the chemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates between one-day embryo culture and immediate transfer for frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles. METHODS: In this cohort retrospective study, 366 FET cycles were divided into two groups: Group A, the embryos were warmed one day before transfer, and were cultured overnight; Group B, the embryos were warmed on the same day of transfer, at least were cultured 1 h before embryo transfer (ET). Chemical and clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were compared between two groups. RESULTS: The chemical pregnancy was higher in group A than B (37.9% versus 28.9%), but this difference was not significant (P = 0.07). Clinical pregnancy (30.8% versus 24.1%) and live birth (19.8% versus 22.05%) were similar in group A and B, (P = 0.15), and (P = 0.8). Conclusion: In conclusion, overnight culture and confirmation of mitosis resumption was not essential for FET cycles in vitrification method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6687221
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66872212019-08-23 Does Overnight Culture of Cleaved Embryos Improve Pregnancy Rate in Vitrified-Warmed Embryo Transfer Programme? Agha-Rahimi, Azam Omidi, Marjan Akyash, Fatemeh Faramarzi, Azita Farshchi, Forough Alsadat Malays J Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Vitrification is a routine procedure in assisted reproductive technique (ART) lab. However, there is widespread variability between protocols of different centres. The aim of this study was to compare the chemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates between one-day embryo culture and immediate transfer for frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles. METHODS: In this cohort retrospective study, 366 FET cycles were divided into two groups: Group A, the embryos were warmed one day before transfer, and were cultured overnight; Group B, the embryos were warmed on the same day of transfer, at least were cultured 1 h before embryo transfer (ET). Chemical and clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were compared between two groups. RESULTS: The chemical pregnancy was higher in group A than B (37.9% versus 28.9%), but this difference was not significant (P = 0.07). Clinical pregnancy (30.8% versus 24.1%) and live birth (19.8% versus 22.05%) were similar in group A and B, (P = 0.15), and (P = 0.8). Conclusion: In conclusion, overnight culture and confirmation of mitosis resumption was not essential for FET cycles in vitrification method. Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia 2019-03 2019-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6687221/ /pubmed/31447608 http://dx.doi.org/10.21315/mjms2019.26.2.6 Text en © Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, 2019 This work is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Agha-Rahimi, Azam
Omidi, Marjan
Akyash, Fatemeh
Faramarzi, Azita
Farshchi, Forough Alsadat
Does Overnight Culture of Cleaved Embryos Improve Pregnancy Rate in Vitrified-Warmed Embryo Transfer Programme?
title Does Overnight Culture of Cleaved Embryos Improve Pregnancy Rate in Vitrified-Warmed Embryo Transfer Programme?
title_full Does Overnight Culture of Cleaved Embryos Improve Pregnancy Rate in Vitrified-Warmed Embryo Transfer Programme?
title_fullStr Does Overnight Culture of Cleaved Embryos Improve Pregnancy Rate in Vitrified-Warmed Embryo Transfer Programme?
title_full_unstemmed Does Overnight Culture of Cleaved Embryos Improve Pregnancy Rate in Vitrified-Warmed Embryo Transfer Programme?
title_short Does Overnight Culture of Cleaved Embryos Improve Pregnancy Rate in Vitrified-Warmed Embryo Transfer Programme?
title_sort does overnight culture of cleaved embryos improve pregnancy rate in vitrified-warmed embryo transfer programme?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6687221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31447608
http://dx.doi.org/10.21315/mjms2019.26.2.6
work_keys_str_mv AT agharahimiazam doesovernightcultureofcleavedembryosimprovepregnancyrateinvitrifiedwarmedembryotransferprogramme
AT omidimarjan doesovernightcultureofcleavedembryosimprovepregnancyrateinvitrifiedwarmedembryotransferprogramme
AT akyashfatemeh doesovernightcultureofcleavedembryosimprovepregnancyrateinvitrifiedwarmedembryotransferprogramme
AT faramarziazita doesovernightcultureofcleavedembryosimprovepregnancyrateinvitrifiedwarmedembryotransferprogramme
AT farshchiforoughalsadat doesovernightcultureofcleavedembryosimprovepregnancyrateinvitrifiedwarmedembryotransferprogramme