Cargando…

Validation of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy among pregnant Australian women

INTRODUCTION: Globally, over half of pregnancies in developed countries are unplanned. Identifying and understanding the prevalence and complexity surrounding pregnancy preparation among Australian women is vital to enable sensitive, responsive approaches to addressing preconception and long-term he...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lang, Adina Y., Hall, Jennifer A., Boyle, Jacqueline A., Harrison, Cheryce L., Teede, Helena, Moran, Lisa J., Barrett, Geraldine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6687283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31393966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220774
_version_ 1783442707597754368
author Lang, Adina Y.
Hall, Jennifer A.
Boyle, Jacqueline A.
Harrison, Cheryce L.
Teede, Helena
Moran, Lisa J.
Barrett, Geraldine
author_facet Lang, Adina Y.
Hall, Jennifer A.
Boyle, Jacqueline A.
Harrison, Cheryce L.
Teede, Helena
Moran, Lisa J.
Barrett, Geraldine
author_sort Lang, Adina Y.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Globally, over half of pregnancies in developed countries are unplanned. Identifying and understanding the prevalence and complexity surrounding pregnancy preparation among Australian women is vital to enable sensitive, responsive approaches to addressing preconception and long-term health improvements for these women with varying motivation levels. AIM: This study evaluated the reliability and validity of a comprehensive pregnancy planning/intention measure (London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy) in a population of pregnant women (over 18 years of age) in Australia. METHODS: A psychometric evaluation, within a cross-sectional study comprising cognitive interviews (to assess comprehension and acceptability) and a field test. Pregnant women aged over 18 years were recruited in early pregnancy (approximately 12 weeks’ gestation). Reliability (internal consistency) was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha, corrected item-total correlations and inter-item correlations, and stability via a test-retest. Construct validity was assessed using principal components analysis and hypothesis testing. RESULTS: Six women participated in cognitive interviews and 317 in the field test. The London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy was acceptable and well comprehended. Reliability testing demonstrated good internal consistency (alpha = 0.81, all corrected item-total correlations >0.20, all inter-item correlations positive) and excellent stability (weighted kappa = 0.92). Validity testing confirmed the unidimensional structure of the measure and all hypotheses were confirmed. CONCLUSIONS: The London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy is a valid and reliable measure of pregnancy planning/intention for the Australian population. Implementation of this measure into all maternity healthcare, research and policy settings will provide accurate population-level pregnancy planning estimates to inform, monitor and evaluate interventions to improve preconception health in Australia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6687283
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66872832019-08-15 Validation of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy among pregnant Australian women Lang, Adina Y. Hall, Jennifer A. Boyle, Jacqueline A. Harrison, Cheryce L. Teede, Helena Moran, Lisa J. Barrett, Geraldine PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Globally, over half of pregnancies in developed countries are unplanned. Identifying and understanding the prevalence and complexity surrounding pregnancy preparation among Australian women is vital to enable sensitive, responsive approaches to addressing preconception and long-term health improvements for these women with varying motivation levels. AIM: This study evaluated the reliability and validity of a comprehensive pregnancy planning/intention measure (London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy) in a population of pregnant women (over 18 years of age) in Australia. METHODS: A psychometric evaluation, within a cross-sectional study comprising cognitive interviews (to assess comprehension and acceptability) and a field test. Pregnant women aged over 18 years were recruited in early pregnancy (approximately 12 weeks’ gestation). Reliability (internal consistency) was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha, corrected item-total correlations and inter-item correlations, and stability via a test-retest. Construct validity was assessed using principal components analysis and hypothesis testing. RESULTS: Six women participated in cognitive interviews and 317 in the field test. The London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy was acceptable and well comprehended. Reliability testing demonstrated good internal consistency (alpha = 0.81, all corrected item-total correlations >0.20, all inter-item correlations positive) and excellent stability (weighted kappa = 0.92). Validity testing confirmed the unidimensional structure of the measure and all hypotheses were confirmed. CONCLUSIONS: The London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy is a valid and reliable measure of pregnancy planning/intention for the Australian population. Implementation of this measure into all maternity healthcare, research and policy settings will provide accurate population-level pregnancy planning estimates to inform, monitor and evaluate interventions to improve preconception health in Australia. Public Library of Science 2019-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6687283/ /pubmed/31393966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220774 Text en © 2019 Lang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lang, Adina Y.
Hall, Jennifer A.
Boyle, Jacqueline A.
Harrison, Cheryce L.
Teede, Helena
Moran, Lisa J.
Barrett, Geraldine
Validation of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy among pregnant Australian women
title Validation of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy among pregnant Australian women
title_full Validation of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy among pregnant Australian women
title_fullStr Validation of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy among pregnant Australian women
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy among pregnant Australian women
title_short Validation of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy among pregnant Australian women
title_sort validation of the london measure of unplanned pregnancy among pregnant australian women
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6687283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31393966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220774
work_keys_str_mv AT langadinay validationofthelondonmeasureofunplannedpregnancyamongpregnantaustralianwomen
AT halljennifera validationofthelondonmeasureofunplannedpregnancyamongpregnantaustralianwomen
AT boylejacquelinea validationofthelondonmeasureofunplannedpregnancyamongpregnantaustralianwomen
AT harrisoncherycel validationofthelondonmeasureofunplannedpregnancyamongpregnantaustralianwomen
AT teedehelena validationofthelondonmeasureofunplannedpregnancyamongpregnantaustralianwomen
AT moranlisaj validationofthelondonmeasureofunplannedpregnancyamongpregnantaustralianwomen
AT barrettgeraldine validationofthelondonmeasureofunplannedpregnancyamongpregnantaustralianwomen