Cargando…
A new era in aneuploidy screening: cfDNA testing in >30,000 multifetal gestations: Experience at one clinical laboratory
Since introducing cell-free DNA screening, Sequenom Laboratories has analyzed over 1 million clinical samples. More than 30,000 of these samples were from multifetal gestations (including twins, triplets and higher-order multiples). The clinical laboratory experience with the first 30,000 multifetal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6687285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31393959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220979 |
_version_ | 1783442708069613568 |
---|---|
author | Dyr, Brittany Boomer, Theresa Almasri, Eyad A. Wardrop, Jenna L. Rafalko, Jill Chibuk, Jason McCullough, Ron M. |
author_facet | Dyr, Brittany Boomer, Theresa Almasri, Eyad A. Wardrop, Jenna L. Rafalko, Jill Chibuk, Jason McCullough, Ron M. |
author_sort | Dyr, Brittany |
collection | PubMed |
description | Since introducing cell-free DNA screening, Sequenom Laboratories has analyzed over 1 million clinical samples. More than 30,000 of these samples were from multifetal gestations (including twins, triplets and higher-order multiples). The clinical laboratory experience with the first 30,000 multifetal samples will be discussed. Maternal plasma samples from multifetal gestations were subjected to DNA extraction and library preparation followed by massively parallel sequencing. Sequencing data were analyzed to identify autosomal trisomies and other subchromosomal events. Fetal fraction requirements were adjusted in proportion to fetal number. Outcome data, when voluntarily received from the ordering provider, were collected from internal case notes. Feedback was received in 50 cases. The positivity rate in multifetal samples for trisomy 21 was 1.50%, 0.47% for trisomy 18, and 0.21% for trisomy 13. Average total sample fetal fraction was 12.2% at a mean gestational age of 13 weeks 6 days. Total non-reportable rate was 5.95%. Estimated performance based on ad hoc clinical feedback demonstrates that possible maximum sensitivity and specificity meet or exceed the original performance from clinical validation studies. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening provides certain advantages over that of conventional screening in multifetal gestations and is available in higher-order multiples. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6687285 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66872852019-08-15 A new era in aneuploidy screening: cfDNA testing in >30,000 multifetal gestations: Experience at one clinical laboratory Dyr, Brittany Boomer, Theresa Almasri, Eyad A. Wardrop, Jenna L. Rafalko, Jill Chibuk, Jason McCullough, Ron M. PLoS One Research Article Since introducing cell-free DNA screening, Sequenom Laboratories has analyzed over 1 million clinical samples. More than 30,000 of these samples were from multifetal gestations (including twins, triplets and higher-order multiples). The clinical laboratory experience with the first 30,000 multifetal samples will be discussed. Maternal plasma samples from multifetal gestations were subjected to DNA extraction and library preparation followed by massively parallel sequencing. Sequencing data were analyzed to identify autosomal trisomies and other subchromosomal events. Fetal fraction requirements were adjusted in proportion to fetal number. Outcome data, when voluntarily received from the ordering provider, were collected from internal case notes. Feedback was received in 50 cases. The positivity rate in multifetal samples for trisomy 21 was 1.50%, 0.47% for trisomy 18, and 0.21% for trisomy 13. Average total sample fetal fraction was 12.2% at a mean gestational age of 13 weeks 6 days. Total non-reportable rate was 5.95%. Estimated performance based on ad hoc clinical feedback demonstrates that possible maximum sensitivity and specificity meet or exceed the original performance from clinical validation studies. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening provides certain advantages over that of conventional screening in multifetal gestations and is available in higher-order multiples. Public Library of Science 2019-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6687285/ /pubmed/31393959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220979 Text en © 2019 Dyr et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dyr, Brittany Boomer, Theresa Almasri, Eyad A. Wardrop, Jenna L. Rafalko, Jill Chibuk, Jason McCullough, Ron M. A new era in aneuploidy screening: cfDNA testing in >30,000 multifetal gestations: Experience at one clinical laboratory |
title | A new era in aneuploidy screening: cfDNA testing in >30,000 multifetal gestations: Experience at one clinical laboratory |
title_full | A new era in aneuploidy screening: cfDNA testing in >30,000 multifetal gestations: Experience at one clinical laboratory |
title_fullStr | A new era in aneuploidy screening: cfDNA testing in >30,000 multifetal gestations: Experience at one clinical laboratory |
title_full_unstemmed | A new era in aneuploidy screening: cfDNA testing in >30,000 multifetal gestations: Experience at one clinical laboratory |
title_short | A new era in aneuploidy screening: cfDNA testing in >30,000 multifetal gestations: Experience at one clinical laboratory |
title_sort | new era in aneuploidy screening: cfdna testing in >30,000 multifetal gestations: experience at one clinical laboratory |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6687285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31393959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220979 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dyrbrittany anewerainaneuploidyscreeningcfdnatestingin30000multifetalgestationsexperienceatoneclinicallaboratory AT boomertheresa anewerainaneuploidyscreeningcfdnatestingin30000multifetalgestationsexperienceatoneclinicallaboratory AT almasrieyada anewerainaneuploidyscreeningcfdnatestingin30000multifetalgestationsexperienceatoneclinicallaboratory AT wardropjennal anewerainaneuploidyscreeningcfdnatestingin30000multifetalgestationsexperienceatoneclinicallaboratory AT rafalkojill anewerainaneuploidyscreeningcfdnatestingin30000multifetalgestationsexperienceatoneclinicallaboratory AT chibukjason anewerainaneuploidyscreeningcfdnatestingin30000multifetalgestationsexperienceatoneclinicallaboratory AT mcculloughronm anewerainaneuploidyscreeningcfdnatestingin30000multifetalgestationsexperienceatoneclinicallaboratory AT dyrbrittany newerainaneuploidyscreeningcfdnatestingin30000multifetalgestationsexperienceatoneclinicallaboratory AT boomertheresa newerainaneuploidyscreeningcfdnatestingin30000multifetalgestationsexperienceatoneclinicallaboratory AT almasrieyada newerainaneuploidyscreeningcfdnatestingin30000multifetalgestationsexperienceatoneclinicallaboratory AT wardropjennal newerainaneuploidyscreeningcfdnatestingin30000multifetalgestationsexperienceatoneclinicallaboratory AT rafalkojill newerainaneuploidyscreeningcfdnatestingin30000multifetalgestationsexperienceatoneclinicallaboratory AT chibukjason newerainaneuploidyscreeningcfdnatestingin30000multifetalgestationsexperienceatoneclinicallaboratory AT mcculloughronm newerainaneuploidyscreeningcfdnatestingin30000multifetalgestationsexperienceatoneclinicallaboratory |