Cargando…

A new era in aneuploidy screening: cfDNA testing in >30,000 multifetal gestations: Experience at one clinical laboratory

Since introducing cell-free DNA screening, Sequenom Laboratories has analyzed over 1 million clinical samples. More than 30,000 of these samples were from multifetal gestations (including twins, triplets and higher-order multiples). The clinical laboratory experience with the first 30,000 multifetal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dyr, Brittany, Boomer, Theresa, Almasri, Eyad A., Wardrop, Jenna L., Rafalko, Jill, Chibuk, Jason, McCullough, Ron M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6687285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31393959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220979
_version_ 1783442708069613568
author Dyr, Brittany
Boomer, Theresa
Almasri, Eyad A.
Wardrop, Jenna L.
Rafalko, Jill
Chibuk, Jason
McCullough, Ron M.
author_facet Dyr, Brittany
Boomer, Theresa
Almasri, Eyad A.
Wardrop, Jenna L.
Rafalko, Jill
Chibuk, Jason
McCullough, Ron M.
author_sort Dyr, Brittany
collection PubMed
description Since introducing cell-free DNA screening, Sequenom Laboratories has analyzed over 1 million clinical samples. More than 30,000 of these samples were from multifetal gestations (including twins, triplets and higher-order multiples). The clinical laboratory experience with the first 30,000 multifetal samples will be discussed. Maternal plasma samples from multifetal gestations were subjected to DNA extraction and library preparation followed by massively parallel sequencing. Sequencing data were analyzed to identify autosomal trisomies and other subchromosomal events. Fetal fraction requirements were adjusted in proportion to fetal number. Outcome data, when voluntarily received from the ordering provider, were collected from internal case notes. Feedback was received in 50 cases. The positivity rate in multifetal samples for trisomy 21 was 1.50%, 0.47% for trisomy 18, and 0.21% for trisomy 13. Average total sample fetal fraction was 12.2% at a mean gestational age of 13 weeks 6 days. Total non-reportable rate was 5.95%. Estimated performance based on ad hoc clinical feedback demonstrates that possible maximum sensitivity and specificity meet or exceed the original performance from clinical validation studies. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening provides certain advantages over that of conventional screening in multifetal gestations and is available in higher-order multiples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6687285
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66872852019-08-15 A new era in aneuploidy screening: cfDNA testing in >30,000 multifetal gestations: Experience at one clinical laboratory Dyr, Brittany Boomer, Theresa Almasri, Eyad A. Wardrop, Jenna L. Rafalko, Jill Chibuk, Jason McCullough, Ron M. PLoS One Research Article Since introducing cell-free DNA screening, Sequenom Laboratories has analyzed over 1 million clinical samples. More than 30,000 of these samples were from multifetal gestations (including twins, triplets and higher-order multiples). The clinical laboratory experience with the first 30,000 multifetal samples will be discussed. Maternal plasma samples from multifetal gestations were subjected to DNA extraction and library preparation followed by massively parallel sequencing. Sequencing data were analyzed to identify autosomal trisomies and other subchromosomal events. Fetal fraction requirements were adjusted in proportion to fetal number. Outcome data, when voluntarily received from the ordering provider, were collected from internal case notes. Feedback was received in 50 cases. The positivity rate in multifetal samples for trisomy 21 was 1.50%, 0.47% for trisomy 18, and 0.21% for trisomy 13. Average total sample fetal fraction was 12.2% at a mean gestational age of 13 weeks 6 days. Total non-reportable rate was 5.95%. Estimated performance based on ad hoc clinical feedback demonstrates that possible maximum sensitivity and specificity meet or exceed the original performance from clinical validation studies. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening provides certain advantages over that of conventional screening in multifetal gestations and is available in higher-order multiples. Public Library of Science 2019-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6687285/ /pubmed/31393959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220979 Text en © 2019 Dyr et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dyr, Brittany
Boomer, Theresa
Almasri, Eyad A.
Wardrop, Jenna L.
Rafalko, Jill
Chibuk, Jason
McCullough, Ron M.
A new era in aneuploidy screening: cfDNA testing in >30,000 multifetal gestations: Experience at one clinical laboratory
title A new era in aneuploidy screening: cfDNA testing in >30,000 multifetal gestations: Experience at one clinical laboratory
title_full A new era in aneuploidy screening: cfDNA testing in >30,000 multifetal gestations: Experience at one clinical laboratory
title_fullStr A new era in aneuploidy screening: cfDNA testing in >30,000 multifetal gestations: Experience at one clinical laboratory
title_full_unstemmed A new era in aneuploidy screening: cfDNA testing in >30,000 multifetal gestations: Experience at one clinical laboratory
title_short A new era in aneuploidy screening: cfDNA testing in >30,000 multifetal gestations: Experience at one clinical laboratory
title_sort new era in aneuploidy screening: cfdna testing in >30,000 multifetal gestations: experience at one clinical laboratory
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6687285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31393959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220979
work_keys_str_mv AT dyrbrittany anewerainaneuploidyscreeningcfdnatestingin30000multifetalgestationsexperienceatoneclinicallaboratory
AT boomertheresa anewerainaneuploidyscreeningcfdnatestingin30000multifetalgestationsexperienceatoneclinicallaboratory
AT almasrieyada anewerainaneuploidyscreeningcfdnatestingin30000multifetalgestationsexperienceatoneclinicallaboratory
AT wardropjennal anewerainaneuploidyscreeningcfdnatestingin30000multifetalgestationsexperienceatoneclinicallaboratory
AT rafalkojill anewerainaneuploidyscreeningcfdnatestingin30000multifetalgestationsexperienceatoneclinicallaboratory
AT chibukjason anewerainaneuploidyscreeningcfdnatestingin30000multifetalgestationsexperienceatoneclinicallaboratory
AT mcculloughronm anewerainaneuploidyscreeningcfdnatestingin30000multifetalgestationsexperienceatoneclinicallaboratory
AT dyrbrittany newerainaneuploidyscreeningcfdnatestingin30000multifetalgestationsexperienceatoneclinicallaboratory
AT boomertheresa newerainaneuploidyscreeningcfdnatestingin30000multifetalgestationsexperienceatoneclinicallaboratory
AT almasrieyada newerainaneuploidyscreeningcfdnatestingin30000multifetalgestationsexperienceatoneclinicallaboratory
AT wardropjennal newerainaneuploidyscreeningcfdnatestingin30000multifetalgestationsexperienceatoneclinicallaboratory
AT rafalkojill newerainaneuploidyscreeningcfdnatestingin30000multifetalgestationsexperienceatoneclinicallaboratory
AT chibukjason newerainaneuploidyscreeningcfdnatestingin30000multifetalgestationsexperienceatoneclinicallaboratory
AT mcculloughronm newerainaneuploidyscreeningcfdnatestingin30000multifetalgestationsexperienceatoneclinicallaboratory