Cargando…

Quality of life after laparoscopic removal of Essure(®) sterilization devices

OBJECTIVE(S): To assess changes in quality of life after laparoscopic removal of Essure(®) sterilization devices (Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany). STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective observational study in an academic research hospital, 80 women with new or worsening symptoms since placement of Essure(...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chene, Gautier, Cerruto, Emanuele, Moret, Stephanie, Lebail-Carval, Karine, Chabert, Philippe, Mellier, Georges, Nohuz, Erdogan, Lamblin, Gery, Clark, T. Justin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6687440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31404292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100054
_version_ 1783442732336807936
author Chene, Gautier
Cerruto, Emanuele
Moret, Stephanie
Lebail-Carval, Karine
Chabert, Philippe
Mellier, Georges
Nohuz, Erdogan
Lamblin, Gery
Clark, T. Justin
author_facet Chene, Gautier
Cerruto, Emanuele
Moret, Stephanie
Lebail-Carval, Karine
Chabert, Philippe
Mellier, Georges
Nohuz, Erdogan
Lamblin, Gery
Clark, T. Justin
author_sort Chene, Gautier
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE(S): To assess changes in quality of life after laparoscopic removal of Essure(®) sterilization devices (Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany). STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective observational study in an academic research hospital, 80 women with new or worsening symptoms since placement of Essure(®) sterilization devices undergoing subsequent surgical removal were included. Laparoscopic removal of Essure(®) devices and salpingectomy with or without cornual excision were performed. Concomitant uterine procedures could be associated where indicated for gynaecological complaints. Comparison using the T student test for coupled series was done in this before-and-after study. RESULTS: Health related quality of life (HRQL) was the primary outcome measured by the Short Form 12 (SF-12) questionnaire and a global 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included assessment of pain, using continuous (VAS) and ordinal scales (Modified McGill Pain Questionnaire), menstrual bleeding (pictorial blood loss assessment chart (PBAC) score) and surgical feasibility and safety. There was a significant improvement in quality of life in both mental and physical health aspects of the SF-12 (34.02 (+/−1.19) vs. 49.61 (+/−1.42, P < .0001) and 36.55 (+/−0.99) vs. 43.32 (+/−1.18, P < .0001 respectively) as well as global VAS assessment (+2.91 (SD +/−0.27)) at the end of the first post-operative month. These improvements were maintained at three and six months. Mean pain decreased at one month following surgery compared to baseline (VAS 3.6 (+/−0.36) to 1.4 (+/−0.25), P < .0001 and McGill pain score 18.70 (+/−1.88) to 4.73 (+/−0.90), P < .0001). Improvements of a similar magnitude were observed when analysis was restricted to the 47 women without concomitant uterine surgery. No significant changes in bleeding were seen following of Essure(®) device removal. Planned procedures were all successfully completed. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic removal of Essure® devices in symptomatic women is technically successful and associated with short and medium-term improvement in quality of life as well as reduction in pelvic pain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6687440
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66874402019-08-09 Quality of life after laparoscopic removal of Essure(®) sterilization devices Chene, Gautier Cerruto, Emanuele Moret, Stephanie Lebail-Carval, Karine Chabert, Philippe Mellier, Georges Nohuz, Erdogan Lamblin, Gery Clark, T. Justin Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X Gynaecology OBJECTIVE(S): To assess changes in quality of life after laparoscopic removal of Essure(®) sterilization devices (Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany). STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective observational study in an academic research hospital, 80 women with new or worsening symptoms since placement of Essure(®) sterilization devices undergoing subsequent surgical removal were included. Laparoscopic removal of Essure(®) devices and salpingectomy with or without cornual excision were performed. Concomitant uterine procedures could be associated where indicated for gynaecological complaints. Comparison using the T student test for coupled series was done in this before-and-after study. RESULTS: Health related quality of life (HRQL) was the primary outcome measured by the Short Form 12 (SF-12) questionnaire and a global 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included assessment of pain, using continuous (VAS) and ordinal scales (Modified McGill Pain Questionnaire), menstrual bleeding (pictorial blood loss assessment chart (PBAC) score) and surgical feasibility and safety. There was a significant improvement in quality of life in both mental and physical health aspects of the SF-12 (34.02 (+/−1.19) vs. 49.61 (+/−1.42, P < .0001) and 36.55 (+/−0.99) vs. 43.32 (+/−1.18, P < .0001 respectively) as well as global VAS assessment (+2.91 (SD +/−0.27)) at the end of the first post-operative month. These improvements were maintained at three and six months. Mean pain decreased at one month following surgery compared to baseline (VAS 3.6 (+/−0.36) to 1.4 (+/−0.25), P < .0001 and McGill pain score 18.70 (+/−1.88) to 4.73 (+/−0.90), P < .0001). Improvements of a similar magnitude were observed when analysis was restricted to the 47 women without concomitant uterine surgery. No significant changes in bleeding were seen following of Essure(®) device removal. Planned procedures were all successfully completed. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic removal of Essure® devices in symptomatic women is technically successful and associated with short and medium-term improvement in quality of life as well as reduction in pelvic pain. Elsevier 2019-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6687440/ /pubmed/31404292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100054 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Gynaecology
Chene, Gautier
Cerruto, Emanuele
Moret, Stephanie
Lebail-Carval, Karine
Chabert, Philippe
Mellier, Georges
Nohuz, Erdogan
Lamblin, Gery
Clark, T. Justin
Quality of life after laparoscopic removal of Essure(®) sterilization devices
title Quality of life after laparoscopic removal of Essure(®) sterilization devices
title_full Quality of life after laparoscopic removal of Essure(®) sterilization devices
title_fullStr Quality of life after laparoscopic removal of Essure(®) sterilization devices
title_full_unstemmed Quality of life after laparoscopic removal of Essure(®) sterilization devices
title_short Quality of life after laparoscopic removal of Essure(®) sterilization devices
title_sort quality of life after laparoscopic removal of essure(®) sterilization devices
topic Gynaecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6687440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31404292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100054
work_keys_str_mv AT chenegautier qualityoflifeafterlaparoscopicremovalofessuresterilizationdevices
AT cerrutoemanuele qualityoflifeafterlaparoscopicremovalofessuresterilizationdevices
AT moretstephanie qualityoflifeafterlaparoscopicremovalofessuresterilizationdevices
AT lebailcarvalkarine qualityoflifeafterlaparoscopicremovalofessuresterilizationdevices
AT chabertphilippe qualityoflifeafterlaparoscopicremovalofessuresterilizationdevices
AT melliergeorges qualityoflifeafterlaparoscopicremovalofessuresterilizationdevices
AT nohuzerdogan qualityoflifeafterlaparoscopicremovalofessuresterilizationdevices
AT lamblingery qualityoflifeafterlaparoscopicremovalofessuresterilizationdevices
AT clarktjustin qualityoflifeafterlaparoscopicremovalofessuresterilizationdevices