Cargando…

How Memory Structures Influence Distress and Recovery

The treatment of emotional distress has stalled. There has been no improvement in depression outcomes for 30 years, and recent opinions have highlighted the lack of clear validity for the mechanisms involved in current models of complex psychological interventions. Emotional distress is a phenomenon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dobbin, Alastair, Ross, Sheila
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6687758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31427994
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00500
_version_ 1783442773424209920
author Dobbin, Alastair
Ross, Sheila
author_facet Dobbin, Alastair
Ross, Sheila
author_sort Dobbin, Alastair
collection PubMed
description The treatment of emotional distress has stalled. There has been no improvement in depression outcomes for 30 years, and recent opinions have highlighted the lack of clear validity for the mechanisms involved in current models of complex psychological interventions. Emotional distress is a phenomenon that underpins a swathe of apparently diverse mental health conditions. Childhood trauma has been found to be endemic and common in those with poor psychological adjustment in adults. Executive processes cause a split between knowledge of an event and knowledge of its negative ongoing emotional effects so making integration of the memory of such events and resolution of its effects is a challenge. Recent research into the relationship between well-being and memory structures has converged with research into episodic memories and their key role in goal programming, giving an opportunity to describe a new model with plausible mechanisms for emotional distress, regulation, resilience, and recovery. Humans seek goals that fulfil their universal basic psychological need for self-determination, and the structures of memory networks drive behavioral algorithms that can satisfy or thwart that goal. We propose that a single underlying deficit in memory networks could underpin the psychopathology of emotional distress and that a new formulation of distress and recovery could drive a useful update on the mechanisms of psychological interventions with greater validity and utility for recovery and propose the NEMESIS (Negative MEmorieS Integration Systems) model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6687758
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66877582019-08-19 How Memory Structures Influence Distress and Recovery Dobbin, Alastair Ross, Sheila Front Psychiatry Psychiatry The treatment of emotional distress has stalled. There has been no improvement in depression outcomes for 30 years, and recent opinions have highlighted the lack of clear validity for the mechanisms involved in current models of complex psychological interventions. Emotional distress is a phenomenon that underpins a swathe of apparently diverse mental health conditions. Childhood trauma has been found to be endemic and common in those with poor psychological adjustment in adults. Executive processes cause a split between knowledge of an event and knowledge of its negative ongoing emotional effects so making integration of the memory of such events and resolution of its effects is a challenge. Recent research into the relationship between well-being and memory structures has converged with research into episodic memories and their key role in goal programming, giving an opportunity to describe a new model with plausible mechanisms for emotional distress, regulation, resilience, and recovery. Humans seek goals that fulfil their universal basic psychological need for self-determination, and the structures of memory networks drive behavioral algorithms that can satisfy or thwart that goal. We propose that a single underlying deficit in memory networks could underpin the psychopathology of emotional distress and that a new formulation of distress and recovery could drive a useful update on the mechanisms of psychological interventions with greater validity and utility for recovery and propose the NEMESIS (Negative MEmorieS Integration Systems) model. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6687758/ /pubmed/31427994 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00500 Text en Copyright © 2019 Dobbin and Ross http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Dobbin, Alastair
Ross, Sheila
How Memory Structures Influence Distress and Recovery
title How Memory Structures Influence Distress and Recovery
title_full How Memory Structures Influence Distress and Recovery
title_fullStr How Memory Structures Influence Distress and Recovery
title_full_unstemmed How Memory Structures Influence Distress and Recovery
title_short How Memory Structures Influence Distress and Recovery
title_sort how memory structures influence distress and recovery
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6687758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31427994
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00500
work_keys_str_mv AT dobbinalastair howmemorystructuresinfluencedistressandrecovery
AT rosssheila howmemorystructuresinfluencedistressandrecovery