Cargando…

Chromosomal aberrations in pregnancy and fetal loss: Insight on the effect of consanguinity, review of 1625 cases

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy loss affects 10%–15% of pregnancies and is caused by several factors, maternal and fetal. Most common cause is chromosomal aneuploidy and has traditionally been detected by karyotyping product of conception and/or fetal tissue. In recent years, array comparative genomic hybridi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Najafi, Kimia, Gholami, Soheila, Moshtagh, Azadeh, Bazrgar, Masood, Sadatian, Neda, Abbasi, Golemaryam, Rostami, Parvin, Khalili, Soheila, Babanejad, Mojgan, Nourmohammadi, Bahareh, Faramarzi Garous, Negin, Najmabadi, Hossein, Kariminejad, Roxana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6687859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31210028
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.820
_version_ 1783442793687941120
author Najafi, Kimia
Gholami, Soheila
Moshtagh, Azadeh
Bazrgar, Masood
Sadatian, Neda
Abbasi, Golemaryam
Rostami, Parvin
Khalili, Soheila
Babanejad, Mojgan
Nourmohammadi, Bahareh
Faramarzi Garous, Negin
Najmabadi, Hossein
Kariminejad, Roxana
author_facet Najafi, Kimia
Gholami, Soheila
Moshtagh, Azadeh
Bazrgar, Masood
Sadatian, Neda
Abbasi, Golemaryam
Rostami, Parvin
Khalili, Soheila
Babanejad, Mojgan
Nourmohammadi, Bahareh
Faramarzi Garous, Negin
Najmabadi, Hossein
Kariminejad, Roxana
author_sort Najafi, Kimia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pregnancy loss affects 10%–15% of pregnancies and is caused by several factors, maternal and fetal. Most common cause is chromosomal aneuploidy and has traditionally been detected by karyotyping product of conception and/or fetal tissue. In recent years, array comparative genomic hybridization (a‐CGH) has been used because of its higher detection and lower failure rates. METHODS: DNA was extracted from 1625 products of abortion or fetal tissue. In 1,104 cases both quantitative fluorescent‐polymerase chain reaction (QF‐PCR) and a‐CGH, and in 521 cases only a‐CGH, was performed. RESULTS: The detection rate using QF‐PCR and a‐CGH is 20% compared to 12.7%, overall, and 15.7%, excluding failed samples, by karyotypes in our center. QF‐PCR and a‐CGH failed in 1.9% of cases, while the failure rate for karyotypes was 20.1%. The difference of detection and failure rates is significant (p‐value < 0.001 and p‐value < 0.001 respectively). Unexpectedly we also found a significant difference in frequency of imbalances in related versus unrelated couples. (χ (2) = 11.4926, p‐value < 0.001). CONCLUSION: It is highly likely that the pregnancy loss in consanguineous couples is caused by other genetic and immune mechanisms. It is plausible that, through the same mechanism by which single gene disorders have a higher prevalence of manifesting disease in consanguineous couples, they can cause lethal genetic disorders leading to pregnancy loss and intra‐uterine fetal death (IUFD) in these couples. Our findings suggest that this is a matter for further study as it will greatly influence the approach to counseling and managing consanguineous couples with pregnancy loss.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6687859
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66878592019-08-14 Chromosomal aberrations in pregnancy and fetal loss: Insight on the effect of consanguinity, review of 1625 cases Najafi, Kimia Gholami, Soheila Moshtagh, Azadeh Bazrgar, Masood Sadatian, Neda Abbasi, Golemaryam Rostami, Parvin Khalili, Soheila Babanejad, Mojgan Nourmohammadi, Bahareh Faramarzi Garous, Negin Najmabadi, Hossein Kariminejad, Roxana Mol Genet Genomic Med Original Articles BACKGROUND: Pregnancy loss affects 10%–15% of pregnancies and is caused by several factors, maternal and fetal. Most common cause is chromosomal aneuploidy and has traditionally been detected by karyotyping product of conception and/or fetal tissue. In recent years, array comparative genomic hybridization (a‐CGH) has been used because of its higher detection and lower failure rates. METHODS: DNA was extracted from 1625 products of abortion or fetal tissue. In 1,104 cases both quantitative fluorescent‐polymerase chain reaction (QF‐PCR) and a‐CGH, and in 521 cases only a‐CGH, was performed. RESULTS: The detection rate using QF‐PCR and a‐CGH is 20% compared to 12.7%, overall, and 15.7%, excluding failed samples, by karyotypes in our center. QF‐PCR and a‐CGH failed in 1.9% of cases, while the failure rate for karyotypes was 20.1%. The difference of detection and failure rates is significant (p‐value < 0.001 and p‐value < 0.001 respectively). Unexpectedly we also found a significant difference in frequency of imbalances in related versus unrelated couples. (χ (2) = 11.4926, p‐value < 0.001). CONCLUSION: It is highly likely that the pregnancy loss in consanguineous couples is caused by other genetic and immune mechanisms. It is plausible that, through the same mechanism by which single gene disorders have a higher prevalence of manifesting disease in consanguineous couples, they can cause lethal genetic disorders leading to pregnancy loss and intra‐uterine fetal death (IUFD) in these couples. Our findings suggest that this is a matter for further study as it will greatly influence the approach to counseling and managing consanguineous couples with pregnancy loss. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6687859/ /pubmed/31210028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.820 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Najafi, Kimia
Gholami, Soheila
Moshtagh, Azadeh
Bazrgar, Masood
Sadatian, Neda
Abbasi, Golemaryam
Rostami, Parvin
Khalili, Soheila
Babanejad, Mojgan
Nourmohammadi, Bahareh
Faramarzi Garous, Negin
Najmabadi, Hossein
Kariminejad, Roxana
Chromosomal aberrations in pregnancy and fetal loss: Insight on the effect of consanguinity, review of 1625 cases
title Chromosomal aberrations in pregnancy and fetal loss: Insight on the effect of consanguinity, review of 1625 cases
title_full Chromosomal aberrations in pregnancy and fetal loss: Insight on the effect of consanguinity, review of 1625 cases
title_fullStr Chromosomal aberrations in pregnancy and fetal loss: Insight on the effect of consanguinity, review of 1625 cases
title_full_unstemmed Chromosomal aberrations in pregnancy and fetal loss: Insight on the effect of consanguinity, review of 1625 cases
title_short Chromosomal aberrations in pregnancy and fetal loss: Insight on the effect of consanguinity, review of 1625 cases
title_sort chromosomal aberrations in pregnancy and fetal loss: insight on the effect of consanguinity, review of 1625 cases
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6687859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31210028
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.820
work_keys_str_mv AT najafikimia chromosomalaberrationsinpregnancyandfetallossinsightontheeffectofconsanguinityreviewof1625cases
AT gholamisoheila chromosomalaberrationsinpregnancyandfetallossinsightontheeffectofconsanguinityreviewof1625cases
AT moshtaghazadeh chromosomalaberrationsinpregnancyandfetallossinsightontheeffectofconsanguinityreviewof1625cases
AT bazrgarmasood chromosomalaberrationsinpregnancyandfetallossinsightontheeffectofconsanguinityreviewof1625cases
AT sadatianneda chromosomalaberrationsinpregnancyandfetallossinsightontheeffectofconsanguinityreviewof1625cases
AT abbasigolemaryam chromosomalaberrationsinpregnancyandfetallossinsightontheeffectofconsanguinityreviewof1625cases
AT rostamiparvin chromosomalaberrationsinpregnancyandfetallossinsightontheeffectofconsanguinityreviewof1625cases
AT khalilisoheila chromosomalaberrationsinpregnancyandfetallossinsightontheeffectofconsanguinityreviewof1625cases
AT babanejadmojgan chromosomalaberrationsinpregnancyandfetallossinsightontheeffectofconsanguinityreviewof1625cases
AT nourmohammadibahareh chromosomalaberrationsinpregnancyandfetallossinsightontheeffectofconsanguinityreviewof1625cases
AT faramarzigarousnegin chromosomalaberrationsinpregnancyandfetallossinsightontheeffectofconsanguinityreviewof1625cases
AT najmabadihossein chromosomalaberrationsinpregnancyandfetallossinsightontheeffectofconsanguinityreviewof1625cases
AT kariminejadroxana chromosomalaberrationsinpregnancyandfetallossinsightontheeffectofconsanguinityreviewof1625cases