Cargando…

Improving adrenaline autoinjector adherence: A psychologically informed training for healthcare professionals

BACKGROUND: Clinicians draw on instructional approaches when training patients with anaphylaxis to use adrenaline autoinjectors, but patient use is poor. Psychological barriers to these behaviours exist but are not considered routinely when training patients to use autoinjectors. Health Psychology p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahoney, Béré, Walklet, Elaine, Bradley, Eleanor, O'Hickey, Steve
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6688075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31290265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/iid3.264
_version_ 1783442817036582912
author Mahoney, Béré
Walklet, Elaine
Bradley, Eleanor
O'Hickey, Steve
author_facet Mahoney, Béré
Walklet, Elaine
Bradley, Eleanor
O'Hickey, Steve
author_sort Mahoney, Béré
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinicians draw on instructional approaches when training patients with anaphylaxis to use adrenaline autoinjectors, but patient use is poor. Psychological barriers to these behaviours exist but are not considered routinely when training patients to use autoinjectors. Health Psychology principles suggest exploring these factors with patients could improve their autoinjector use. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a 90‐minute workshop training clinicians in strategies and techniques for exploring and responding to psychological barriers to autoinjector use with patients. Attendees’ knowledge, confidence and likelihood of using the strategies were expected to improve. METHODS: Impact was evaluated using a longitudinal mixed‐method design. Twenty‐nine clinicians (general and specialist nurses, general practitioners, and pharmacists) supporting patients with anaphylaxis in UK hospitals and general practice attended. Self‐rated knowledge, confidence, and likelihood of using the strategies taught were evaluated online 1 week before, 1 to 3, and 6 to 8 weeks after the workshop. Clinicians were invited for telephone interview after attending to explore qualitatively the workshop impact. RESULTS: χ (2) analyses were significant in most cases (P < .05), with sustained (6‐8 weeks) improvements in knowledge, confidence, and likelihood of using the strategies taught. Thematic analysis of interview data showed the workshop enhanced attendees’ knowledge of the care pathway, understanding of patient's experience of anaphylaxis as psychological not purely physical, and altered their communication with this and other patient groups. However, interviewees perceived lack of time and organisational factors as barriers to using the strategies and techniques taught in clinical contexts. CONCLUSION: Training clinicians in psychologically informed strategies produce sustained improvements in their confidence and knowledge around patient autoinjector education, and their likelihood of using strategies in clinical practice. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Exploring psychological barriers should be part of training patients with anaphylaxis in autoinjector use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6688075
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66880752019-08-14 Improving adrenaline autoinjector adherence: A psychologically informed training for healthcare professionals Mahoney, Béré Walklet, Elaine Bradley, Eleanor O'Hickey, Steve Immun Inflamm Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: Clinicians draw on instructional approaches when training patients with anaphylaxis to use adrenaline autoinjectors, but patient use is poor. Psychological barriers to these behaviours exist but are not considered routinely when training patients to use autoinjectors. Health Psychology principles suggest exploring these factors with patients could improve their autoinjector use. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a 90‐minute workshop training clinicians in strategies and techniques for exploring and responding to psychological barriers to autoinjector use with patients. Attendees’ knowledge, confidence and likelihood of using the strategies were expected to improve. METHODS: Impact was evaluated using a longitudinal mixed‐method design. Twenty‐nine clinicians (general and specialist nurses, general practitioners, and pharmacists) supporting patients with anaphylaxis in UK hospitals and general practice attended. Self‐rated knowledge, confidence, and likelihood of using the strategies taught were evaluated online 1 week before, 1 to 3, and 6 to 8 weeks after the workshop. Clinicians were invited for telephone interview after attending to explore qualitatively the workshop impact. RESULTS: χ (2) analyses were significant in most cases (P < .05), with sustained (6‐8 weeks) improvements in knowledge, confidence, and likelihood of using the strategies taught. Thematic analysis of interview data showed the workshop enhanced attendees’ knowledge of the care pathway, understanding of patient's experience of anaphylaxis as psychological not purely physical, and altered their communication with this and other patient groups. However, interviewees perceived lack of time and organisational factors as barriers to using the strategies and techniques taught in clinical contexts. CONCLUSION: Training clinicians in psychologically informed strategies produce sustained improvements in their confidence and knowledge around patient autoinjector education, and their likelihood of using strategies in clinical practice. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Exploring psychological barriers should be part of training patients with anaphylaxis in autoinjector use. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6688075/ /pubmed/31290265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/iid3.264 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Immunity, Inflammation and Disease Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Mahoney, Béré
Walklet, Elaine
Bradley, Eleanor
O'Hickey, Steve
Improving adrenaline autoinjector adherence: A psychologically informed training for healthcare professionals
title Improving adrenaline autoinjector adherence: A psychologically informed training for healthcare professionals
title_full Improving adrenaline autoinjector adherence: A psychologically informed training for healthcare professionals
title_fullStr Improving adrenaline autoinjector adherence: A psychologically informed training for healthcare professionals
title_full_unstemmed Improving adrenaline autoinjector adherence: A psychologically informed training for healthcare professionals
title_short Improving adrenaline autoinjector adherence: A psychologically informed training for healthcare professionals
title_sort improving adrenaline autoinjector adherence: a psychologically informed training for healthcare professionals
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6688075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31290265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/iid3.264
work_keys_str_mv AT mahoneybere improvingadrenalineautoinjectoradherenceapsychologicallyinformedtrainingforhealthcareprofessionals
AT walkletelaine improvingadrenalineautoinjectoradherenceapsychologicallyinformedtrainingforhealthcareprofessionals
AT bradleyeleanor improvingadrenalineautoinjectoradherenceapsychologicallyinformedtrainingforhealthcareprofessionals
AT ohickeysteve improvingadrenalineautoinjectoradherenceapsychologicallyinformedtrainingforhealthcareprofessionals